On The Economic Populist you might have noticed the middle column. We try to list other sites and blogs who have exceptional insight and writing on what is happening in the U.S. economy.
Sometimes though, one cannot say it better but miss those who did. With that, EP is starting the infamous link post series, otherwise known as read this, did you see this? The title of the links series will be the title of this post with the date modified. With introductions over, onto the read this post!
Must Read #1
Over on Naked Capitalism is a guest post The Real Reason Giant Insolvent Banks are not Being Broken Up. He has a host of bullet points as to why the obvious hasn't happened and no, it's not because the governent's hands are tied. Just one quote:
The statement by William K. Black (senior S&L regulator and professor of law and economics) that the government's entire strategy now - as in the S&L crisis - is to cover up how bad things are ("the entire strategy is to keep people from getting the facts") makes a lot more sense.
Must Read #2
Econbrowser has an exceptional call out post on World Bank President, general nightmare, neocon Zoellick, who recently gave a speech that the U.S. dollar is in trouble as a reserve currency and could be replaced with the Euro. In The Dollar in Doubt?:
In other words, in terms of analysis, the speech was much ado about nothing, although I may be missing some sort of political subtext.
Chen continues into quite an analysis to justify his conclusions.
At the time Zoellick's speech made the news, I didn't post it for the guy is a notorious neocon and what I intuitively thought was oh, yet another traitorous action against the United States instead of any real credibility to the talk.
For gold bugs, we'll point to an article on the other side, betting against the dollar as a reserve currency from Seeking Alpha, Gold Expected to reach $3000.
Must Read #3
Calculated Risk has a weekly summary post on a series of economic indicators. So does Econbrowser. While Calculated Risk has a host of fantastic analysis graphs, this one, in particular is insightful on the U.S. unemployment rate of now vs. past recessions.
In a Seeking Alpha post, this recession ain't over, is a nice detail on how the unemployment statistics are not based on quantitative data. Check out this Venn diagram visual on just how much we do not know about the U.S. labor market. I agree with this one, we need citizenship status, real quantitative data on the U.S. population to get a true gauge on what is going on in labor markets. As it is the BLS counts foreign guest workers in U.S. unemployment statistics (in the millions, which this diagram completely misses).
Others of Interest
CNN has a front page story on how a $3.9 Billion government program, The Neighborhood Stabilization Program, which is supposed to buy up foreclosed properties, can't, because the banks won't sell 'em. This is the first I heard of such a program and they are supposed to use 25% of this money to help poor people get into homes (where have we seen this before). There are so many programs and such large Federal sums pouring everywhere, it's hard to track what is going where and doing anything. Looks like a poster child for ineffective and inefficient.
Time's The Curious Capitalist has the best summary post on the great the Stimulus has had x effect war that is going on in the MSM, in speeches and in the blogs. (I completely agree, sticking your thumb in the air to measure the wind (multiplier effect), is a pretty damn useless exercise.) He says the title of such pieces should be:
Our Macro Model Says the Stimulus Won't Have Much Positive Impact, Robert Barro's Model Says It Will Have a Negative Impact, and the Obama Administration's Model Says It Will Have a Big Positive Impact. While There's Not Even Remotely Enough Information Available Yet to Tell Who's Right, We've Taken a Couple of Isolated Data Points Out of Context and Spun Them to Support Our Case.