Zero Hedge

Navigating The Curve: The Allure And Risks Of Long-Dated US Treasuries

Navigating The Curve: The Allure And Risks Of Long-Dated US Treasuries

Authored by Mario Eisenegger via BondVigilantes.com,

Compared to a year ago, the US Treasury curve has steepened considerably.

While yields at the front end have dropped due to anticipated rate cuts, the long end of the curve has not budged.

In fact, long-end bonds have sold off, giving bond investors the opportunity to lock in elevated yields.

That’s quite a tempting thought, considering we’re talking about the US, which sets the global reference rate for many asset classes.

Source: Bloomberg, 31 October 2025

In economies where GDP growth is constrained by high levels of debt and unfavourable demographics, governments either need to hope for a productivity boom or be prudent with spending plans to keep debt-to-GDP metrics in check. Achieving the latter can be challenging given the pressures of rising geopolitical tensions and the structural incentives in democratic systems that often prioritise short-term spending commitments during election cycles. This, in turn, increases the odds of inflation playing a larger role in achieving fiscal sustainability in the future.

In a world of financial repression, an opportunity to lock in positive real yields at 2-2.5% is worth considering. But, it is not a slam dunk.

Below, we share are a few concerns that keep us on the sidelines for now.

Risk one: absence of productivity boom

Running fiscal deficits when yields are high and debt-to-GDP levels are elevated can be  risky business. The US is currently doing just that which explains why the bond market has revalued the compensation it demands for owning long-dated US Treasuries. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) sees federal debt rise from 100% to 118% of GDP by 2035, reporting the highest point in US history.

Source: Congressional Budget Office

Earlier this year, Deutsche Bank calculated the budget deficit the US must maintain to stabilise its debt metrics. According to their calculations, the US would need to run a primary budget deficit-to-GDP ratio that is no larger than 1.2% to keep debt-to-GDP stable over the long run. With the fiscal package estimated to keep budget deficits as a share of GDP between 5% and 7% over the next few years, deficits of that size look unsustainable in the absence of a productivity boom. Hopes for productivity gains through AI are high. If the story holds up and the much-hoped-for productivity gains materialise, then the US fiscal situation could suddenly look much brighter. Having said that, the CBO also notes that if productivity growth is 0.5% slower per year compared to their baseline assumption, debt could surge to over 200% of GDP by 2055. This highlights how sensitive debt assumptions are, increasing the risk of policy errors that could  lead to further repricing of long-dated US bonds.

Risk two: erosion of Fed independence

In August, President Trump attempted to remove Lisa Cook from the Fed’s board of governors, citing allegations that she falsified records to obtain favourable terms on a mortgage before joining the central bank in 2022. Although the Supreme Court ruled that Cook, who is perceived as a hawkish board member, could remain in her position temporarily, Trump’s move could indicate an attempt to increase his influence over the Fed. The Fed may face repeated pressure if its monetary policies do not align with the White House’s political priorities. Jerome Powell’s term as Federal Reserve chair ends in May 2026, and Trump has stated that he will not nominate “Too-Late” Powell for another term. A new Fed chair might take a more dovish stance, increasing the risk that the Fed opts for lower interest rates to stimulate economic growth. One can argue that the US economy has become more resilient, given that 81% of GDP is now service-oriented, which tends to solve for smoother economic cycles. Cutting rates in a weakening but still growing economy, where inflation hovers above the Fed’s target, is risky business and may lead investors to demand higher long-term interest rates.

Risk three: tariff income might be deemed illegal

The president used a 1977 emergency law to impose tariffs on goods from over 100 countries. On the back of that, tariff revenues have grown for months, and the latest data shows that the US has collected $223.9 billion from them as of 31st October which is $142.2 billion more than the same time last year. This month, the US Supreme Court began hearing cases that could rule certain tariffs and their corresponding revenue streams illegal. These developments could worsen the US fiscal situation and bring the fiscal challenge back into the limelight, likely leading to higher term premium. I consider this likely to be a short term impact, as the Trump administration will probably  find new ways to enact tariffs.

Risk four: shift away from T-Bill heavy funding profile

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has signalled a preference to avoid locking the government into higher borrowing costs when bills are cheaper. Just a few days ago the US Treasury confirmed this by indicating in its quarterly refinancing statement that it does not plan to increase sales of notes and bonds until well into next year and will rely more heavily on bills, which mature in up to one year, to fund the budget deficit. T-bills currently comprise 20% of the US debt held by the public. The Treasury has acknowledged that this reliance reduces expected costs while also increasing volatility of its funding profile. This trade-off is highly sensitive to baseline economic forecasts. While the current funding mix is appropriate in a “productivity boom” scenario, other scenarios highlight additional risks. Interestingly, their model suggests that a reduction in bill issuance in favour of mid-duration issuance could lower volatility for a negligible increase in costs in adverse scenarios. Thus, the odds of a shift away from a T-bill-heavy funding profile might be higher than many believe.

While the positive real yields offered by long-dated US Treasuries are tempting, we await the resolution of some of the uncertainties discussed to strengthen our conviction. For now, we consider positive real yields more attractive in other market areas where we have greater confidence in the direction of long-dated yields.

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/18/2025 - 12:05

Sen. Graham Touts Movement On New Russian Sanctions Bill 'With Trump's Blessing'

Sen. Graham Touts Movement On New Russian Sanctions Bill 'With Trump's Blessing'

Sen. Lindsey Graham announced Monday the Senate is taking up legislation that would sanction Russia's trading partners, in order to ramp up the pressure on Moscow to end the war with Ukraine.

The announcement came after President Donald Trump told reporters Sunday night the proposed legislation would be "OK with me" - which marked his strongest signal yet that he's planning on signing off on it.

Graham, a Russia hawk (and pretty much hawkish on all other conflicts and official US 'enemies' in the world) unveiled the move forward on the legislation "with President Trump’s blessing."

via AP

He described the necessity of yet more sanctions in order to "continue the momentum to end this war honorably, justly and once and for all."

"This legislation is designed to give President Trump more flexibility and power to push Putin to the peace table by going after both Putin and countries like Iran that support him," Graham wrote. "I appreciate the strong bipartisan support for this legislation in both the House of Representatives and the Senate."

"The Senate will move soon on a tough sanctions bill — not only against Russia — but also against countries like China and India that buy Russian energy products that finance Putin’s war machine," Graham additionally stated. "The Senate bill has a presidential waiver to give President Trump maximum leverage."

"When it comes to Putin and those who support his war machine, it is time to change the game," he continued. Further, Graham again verified that Trump "is looking at [the bill] very strongly." But Trump wants the ultimate final say-so:

Graham and Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), a co-sponsor of the bill, worked to include the presidential waiver to satisfy a White House request to give Trump more optionsaccording to Politico.

US media is framing this as part of Trump "losing patience" with Putin over ending the war; however, the reality remains that Kiev and its Western backers have been unwilling to offer territorial concessions. Finally ceding Crimea hasn't even been on the table.

"We get a lot of bullshit thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth," Trump recently told reporters. "He’s very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless." And Graham responded to Trump's words by saying the president "is spot on about the games Putin is playing."

Lately, amid a 'civil war' in MAGA-land in the wake of the Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes interview, many of Trump's supporters have vehemently complained that Trump is too much in neocon Lindsey Graham's corner on foreign policy. His administration certainly didn't start off like that.

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/18/2025 - 11:45

AI "Circle Jerk" Rages On: Microsoft, Nvidia Invest $15 Billion In Anthropic

AI "Circle Jerk" Rages On: Microsoft, Nvidia Invest $15 Billion In Anthropic

Two months ago, when nobody was talking about the coming AI debt tsunami needed to bankroll trillions in data-center capex, and nobody was paying attention to Oracle's CDS quietly blow out, and well ahead of the Bank of England's AI valuation warning, we published "The Stunning Math Behind The AI Vendor Financing "Circle Jerk," essentially laying out all the weakest links in the swelling global AI bubble.

In the report, we laid out the ridiculous circle-jerk vendor financing schemes concocted by the handful of top players to pretend their revenue is growing at a rapid pace. We also called it an "infinite money glitch"...

Most notably, the players.

Fast-forward to Tuesday: the AI bubble keeps deflating, hyperscalers are under pressure, Bitcoin trading in the $92k range, and Microsoft and Amazon were just downgraded to neutral by Rothschild & Co. and Redburn's Alexander Haissl. Now comes fresh news from Microsoft and Nvidia, attempting to revive the AI hype with yet another round of circle-jerking. 

Bloomberg reports Microsoft and Nvidia will invest up to $15 billion in Anthropic. As part of the agreement, Anthropic will purchase $30 billion of compute from Microsoft's Azure, which only confirms more circle-jerking

"We are increasingly going to be customers of each other — we will use Anthropic models, they will use our infrastructure, and we will go to market together," Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella stated in a video, adding, "Of course, this all builds on the partnership we have with OpenAI, which remains a critical partner for Microsoft."

To support the AI-infrastructure buildout, Anthropic plans to spend $50 billion building AI data centers across multiple states. The AI company is simultaneously partnered with Google, which agreed in October to supply up to 1 million AI chips. 

Earlier, analyst Haissl warned that the bullish case around generative AI is no longer clear and hyperscalers should be approached with caution

He noted the industry's "trust us - Gen-AI is just like early cloud 1.0" pitch is flawed and that the underlying economics are far weaker than assumed.

Building on Haissl's warning, we've been very early in covering Oracle's CDS blowout, even offering warnings about AI debt and valuations well before the Bank of England

Bad news for the AI stocks. 

As we've previously joked. 

Morgan Stanley analysts need to add Anthropic to the circle jerking.

Harris Kupperman, CIO of Praetorian Capital, posted the following on X,

Love how shareholders look at this deal, realize that this guarantees big losses for years into the future, and sell them like they're shale shit-cos promising to raise production in a $50 oil environment. Welcome to 2016 tech bros. The multiple compression is only just starting...

Rihard Jarc, co-founder and CIO of New Era Funds, pointed out that multiple narratives are converging in the Microsoft-Nvidia-Anthropic partnership:

So many narratives are at play here in the Microsoft-Nvidia-Anthropic partnership:

  1. Nvidia saw Anthropic do a deal with Google's TPUs and Amazon's Trainium, so it had to ensure Anthropic stays committed to Nvidia hardware.

  2. Microsoft is signaling that its future isn't dependent on OpenAI alone.

  3. Anthropic is showing investors it can line up splashy partnerships and meaningful letter-of-intent orders.

  4. And all of them timed this announcement to land on the same day as Google's Gemini 3.0 release - because if Google wins the frontier-model race decisively, all three would feel the pressure.

How does all this end? Trump's AI advisor, David Sacks may have offered a clue: "There will be no federal bailout for AI. The U.S. has at least five major frontier-model companies. If one fails, others will take its place."

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/18/2025 - 11:30

China's Oil Stockpiling Accelerated In October

China's Oil Stockpiling Accelerated In October

Authored by Irina Slav via OilPrice.com,

China stockpiled crude oil at elevated rates in October, at a daily rate of some 690,000 barrels, up from 570,000 barrels daily in September, Reuters’ Clyde Russell reported today, citing calculations derived from official Beijing data.

Refinery throughput in October averaged 14.94 million barrels daily, the official data showed, while imports ran at a rate of 11.39 million barrels daily, Russell reported.

The refinery throughput figure was a 6.4% increase on the year, suggesting healthy demand for oil, but it was also a decline on September’s 15.26 million bpd average.

The September figure was a two-year high.

Imports, meanwhile, averaged 11.39 million barrels daily in October, adding to local production of 4.24 million barrels daily for a total daily supply rate of 15.63 million barrels.

The difference between supply and demand, as based on refinery runs, is assumed to be going into storage, although some of it might be processed by small refineries that are not included in the official data, Russell notes in his regular reports on the state of China’s oil market.

This stockpiling on the part of China has become a major reason for the relative stability of oil prices.

It is based on the rather reasonable assumption that if China, the world’s largest oil importer, has built a supply cushion in case of disruption, then a surge in demand following such a disruption is unlikely. This assumption has acted as one more lid on prices, along with regular reports about electric vehicles replacing internal combustion engines in the world’s biggest car market.

Over the first ten months of the year, China was stockpiling crude at a daily rate of 900,000 barrels, the Reuters report also said, giving a rather comfortable size to that supply cushion in case of disruption, such as the latest U.S. sanctions on Russia’s Rosneft and Lukoil.

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/18/2025 - 11:00

Callaway Sells Struggling Topgolf To Los Angeles Private Equity

Callaway Sells Struggling Topgolf To Los Angeles Private Equity

We raised the question back in 2023: was the Topgolf mania just another consumer hype bubble?

Turns out that may have been the case. Topgolf Callaway Brands had been trying to unload or spin off the Topgolf unit for some time, and now they have.

Bloomberg reports that Callaway has sold a 60% stake in its Topgolf and Toptracer division to Leonard Green & Partners in a deal valuing the business at about $1.1 billion. This means the 60% stake will generate about $770 million for Callaway. 

Callaway originally acquired Topgolf in 2020 for about $2 billion. After the sale closes in 1Q26, the company will rebrand itself as Callaway Golf Company under the ticker "CALY" and refocus on its core golf equipment brands, stepping away from the struggling golf-experience chain.

In September, Golf Digest published a report based on conversations with former Topgolf executives Devin Charhon and Michael Canfield, revealing that Topgolf never achieved a stable flow of returning customers (cost was a major factor).

The former execs left the company to start Blue Jeans, which created the "Golf Ranch" brand, modernizing aging driving ranges and making it more of an actual practice facility for golfers rather than the Togolf experience of fancy screens and lights. It turns out golfers just want to practice.  

Well, that wasn't as planned. 

Golf Ranch sounds more reasonable. 

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/18/2025 - 10:40

The Boundaries Dividing Political, Monetary, Fiscal, Trade And Other Policies Are Gone

The Boundaries Dividing Political, Monetary, Fiscal, Trade And Other Policies Are Gone

By Michael Every of Rabobank

The Polycene and the Monocene

For over a decade our global strategy has warned the ‘liberal world order’ would collapse. Now, the New York Times’ Tom Friedman, in ‘Welcome to Our New Era. What Do We Call It?’, shares that “For the past few years, I have had to ask myself a question I never asked before in my life: What should we call the era we’re living in today?” He’s running with ‘The Polycene’, which in Greek means “There’s so much going on that a ‘Monocene’ focus on data won’t help.”

In markets stocks, tech, crypto, and even gold are down. Japanese 20-year JGB yields just hit the highest since 1999, prompting a meeting at 15:30 Japan time today between PM Takaichi and BOJ Governor Ueda – but what can be done endogenously that doesn’t smash either the JGB market or JPY? There are also warnings over private credit - yet we also continue to see circular-investing / vendor-financing mega deals in the AI space.

In geopolitics, the USS Ford has arrived in the Caribbean: what does that mean for Venezuela, as Chile is expected to see a US-friendly shift in its presidential election? In Asia, the US pulled a missile system from Japan as the Beijing–Tokyo row over Taiwan deepens despite the latter’s attempts to deescalate. In Europe, Berlin and Paris may scrap a planned joint fighter as France plans to supply Ukraine with 100 Rafales, upping the ante with Russia; Brussels warns the EU’s proposed €140bn Ukraine loan could have a “knock-on” impact on financial markets; Poland says a rail explosion there was an “unprecedented act of sabotage”; and the FT warns ‘The scramble for Europe is just beginning’, where “as the EU struggles to defend its interests, outside powers play divide and rule,” putting a new spin on ‘DM = EM’. In the Mid-East, the UN Security Council backed Trump’s plan for postwar Gaza, as the US intends to sell F-35 fighter jets to Saudi Arabia, whose more cash-strapped MBS will visit the White House today for arm twisting on expanding the Abraham Accords.

As military spending surges, the fiscal picture is worrying. Russia is raising VAT by 2 percentage points. The US is talking $2,000 cheques for working families paid for by tariffs. France still hasn’t agreed a budget. Germany is about to splurge on arms. Canada is borrowing far more, but not for that. The UK just saw market volatility over suggestions taxes wouldn’t be raised when the market had previously disliked the idea that they would. China is rolling out stimulus. Japan’s PM also wants fiscal stimulus… to lower inflation.

Supply chains are geopolitically squeezed. Both GM and Tesla say they won’t use Chinese parts in the US. German is freezing out Huawei and will bring in new tech controls aimed at China. The Dutch-Chinese Nexperia row rumbles on, and a new row has started. The US still hasn’t formally secured the China rare earths deal it wants. Positively, India says a US trade deal is closer after agreeing to take much more US LNG. Negatively, the US just warned Europe over trade foot-dragging, and the Chair of UBS has talked to Scott Bessent about moving the bank to the States.

Affordability remains a key issue in the West: there’s a Trump summit on it today. The situation is similar in other DM – and worse in EM. House prices are sky high: the average age of a US home buyer has risen to 59(!) A top Aussie banker says housing heat is raising concerns and calls to ‘Put the brakes on’ follow a record A$40bn investor blitz into property as everyone --but the central bank-- predicted would follow RBA rate cuts. Moreover, the AFR warns ‘China’s debt shock is coming. Our high house prices won’t protect us’, and “Australia’s economy isn’t ready.”

The threat of AI job losses is soaring. That’s as MAGA politicians are demanding transparency on AI job losses, where “Protecting US workers collides with need to outpace China”, and ‘Notices of Impending Layoffs by US Companies Surged in October’ (Bloomberg). Yet Elon Musk states his robots could end poverty and provide universal high incomes. So, what’s next: mass unemployment or ‘abundance’ or both? Which central bank has either in their models?

Political populism keeps rising. Mamdani won in New York. Trump has been forced to agree to release the Epstein files, as a far-right (and libertarian) ‘America First’ faction challenges MAGA. In Australia, the Nats/Libs Coalition is down sharply in the polls after it dropped a commitment to net zero and says it wants much lower immigration, as populist One Nation surges. In the UK, the Reform party says it would cut off benefits for EU citizens and slash overseas aid to save £25bn: the UK press says the police are preparing for civil war. On Friday, PM Takaichi announced she may change the corporate code to force Japanese firms to invest more or pay higher wages rather than return profits to shareholders. In Nepal, Indonesia, and Mexico Gen-Z protests just tried to bring down their governments. Again, central banks can’t capture this – but may be captured.

Indeed, D.L. Jacobs argues the Fed’s Miran aims to challenge the foundations of US monetary policy “because the world [Fed] forecasts are trying to measure no longer exists.” Keynesianism emerged in the Great Depression of the 1930s; monetarism with the Great Stagflation of the 1970s; hyper-neoliberalism in the post-Cold War 1990s; central bank QE in the post-GFC 2000s; and Miran argues the Treasury and Fed de facto merged in the 2020s so “The pretence of central bank independence has collapsed. Monetary policy is now politics conducted by other means.” And the US faces a panoply of (geo)political challenges.

“For Miran, the answer is not to restore a lost neutrality. It is to make that power accountable the goal of central bank independence can be achieved only by new means.” We are seeing similar rhetoric from Reform in the UK and the RN in France. (As former Fed Governor Kugler is accused of violating trading ethics, current Governor Cook is in court to fight charges of mortgage fraud, ex-governor Clarida was forced to step down in 2022 over stock trading, and for-now current Governor Bostic was warned over the same.)   

New means means new thinking – and for Miran that’s part of the Mar-a-Lago Accords that also involves trade, the US dollar, and US Treasuries. The current account deficits required to give the world demanded Eurodollars mean US financialisation, polarisation, deindustrialisation, and de-hegemonisation – which the US now intends to resist, not accept.

As such, the boundaries dividing political, monetary, fiscal, trade and other policies are gone (as we had flagged) and, as Jacobs puts it, “Miran argues that coordination should be made deliberate and accountable. He’s on a mission to modernize US-led capitalism, turning ad-hoc crisis management into a coherent framework for political economy.”

But is there one and will it work? We think yes, and it remains to be seen. But that needs to be the market debate, not what payrolls, PMIs, or CPI will be. However, it’s also true that the worse those data are, the greater the pressure for revolutionary policy changes ahead of the key US mid-term elections.

For now avoiding all these debates, the RBA minutes of its November policy rate meeting showed one member pushing back on the idea that its unemployment and inflation goals bear equal weight --so which matters most?-- and the overall message was that the Reserve Bank will only consider cutting rates again if the labor market shows a serious deterioration. That’s the kind of deep Monocene thinking for which one is, or at least was, paid the big bucks. But in the world that exists today, is it possible that such an outcome could also correlate with a further surge in house prices anyway? And if so, then what?

That question doesn’t get asked anywhere near enough in anywhere near enough contexts.

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/18/2025 - 10:20

Factory Orders Data Show Rebound In August

Factory Orders Data Show Rebound In August

As the macro data engine slowly starts to grind back into motion, we are given glimpses of what happened 'months' ago. Earlier we got some jobless claims data from four weeks ago, and now we get Durable Goods and Factory Orders data from August...

...and the data we got was kinda meh...

August Factory orders rose 1.4% MoM (a big swing from the 1.3% MoM decline in July and an even bigger drop in June) but in line with expectations. This bounce lifted Orders by 3.8% YoY...

Source: Bloomberg

Core Factory Orders also rose (just 0.1% MoM), lifting orders 1.53% YoY in August...

Source: Bloomberg

More broadly, durable goods orders (final for August) rose 2.9% MoM (up from -2.8% in July) while Core Durable Goods Orders (ex-transports) rose 0.3% MoM (slightly less than the 0.4% expected) but remained solid for the fifth month in a row...

Source: Bloomberg

Finally, we note that Core shipments, an input for the GDP calculation, declined 0.4% (vs. +0.6% prior).

So, August was solid, but as a reminder, it's November!

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/18/2025 - 10:12

Trump Blasts "Big, Fat, Rich Insurance Companies" As Lawmakers Propose Ways To 'Fix' Obamacare

Trump Blasts "Big, Fat, Rich Insurance Companies" As Lawmakers Propose Ways To 'Fix' Obamacare

Obamacare remains on center stage nearly a week after the government shutdown ended on Nov. 12.

The health coverage program, formally known as the Affordable Care Act Health Insurance Marketplace, was a driver of the government shutdown as Democrats demanded that temporary enhanced subsidies for the program be made permanent.

The shutdown ended only after Senate Republicans agreed to hold a vote on the matter, though they did not guarantee an outcome.

Democrats generally favor making the enhanced subsidies permanent.

Republicans, including President Donald Trump, have proposed alternatives they say will give Americans greater control over their health care spending and lower premiums.

Trump made it extremely clear what his preferred approach is this morning in a FULL CAPS post on Truth Social: (emphasis ours)

THE ONLY HEALTHCARE I WILL SUPPORT OR APPROVE IS SENDING THE MONEY DIRECTLY BACK TO THE PEOPLE, WITH NOTHING GOING TO THE BIG, FAT, RICH INSURANCE COMPANIES, WHO HAVE MADE $TRILLIONS, AND RIPPED OFF AMERICA LONG ENOUGH.

THE PEOPLE WILL BE ALLOWED TO NEGOTIATE AND BUY THEIR OWN, MUCH BETTER, INSURANCE. POWER TO THE PEOPLE!

Congress, do not waste your time and energy on anything else.

This is the only way to have great Healthcare in America!!!

GET IT DONE, NOW.

President DJT

Lawrence Wilson explains below, via The Epoch Times, why Obamacare is a hot issue right now and what both sides are proposing.

Premiums Continue to Rise

Commercial health insurance premiums have risen every year since 2008, according to Health System Tracker, a data collection site run by the nonprofits The Peterson Center on Healthcare and KFF.

Obamacare premiums have also risen nearly every year since the program began in 2014, with the exception of 2020–2023. Those were the first years of the enhanced premium subsidies, authorized by Congress as a temporary response to COVID-19 health emergencies.

The enhanced subsidies allowed people making more than four times the federal poverty level to buy subsidized coverage. They also capped the out-of-pocket premium costs at 8 percent of a person’s household income, with the government paying the rest. The enhanced subsidies are set to expire at the end of 2025.

Rates have risen each year since 2022 and will increase about 26 percent in 2026, on average, for the Benchmark Silver plan.

Direct Payments to Consumers

Trump floated the idea of giving low- and middle-income Americans a direct payment of $2,000 rather than providing a subsidy that is paid to insurance companies.

That would allow people to purchase their own insurance, Trump said in a Nov. 8 social media post. The president added that this would avoid putting more money into a health coverage system that, he said, provided inferior health coverage.

The White House is in discussion with lawmakers about the idea, Trump told reporters on Nov. 14.

“I’ve had personal talks with some Democrats,” he said, adding that the plan would allow consumers to negotiate their own price with an insurer.

Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) is drafting legislation for a similar plan now. His plan would send money directly to individual Health Savings Accounts, much like Trump suggested.

“They can use it to spend on healthcare, so they can buy direct health care, or they can buy insurance, or [use it for] a co-payment or deductible,” Scott told Reporters on Nov. 10.

Consumers could use the funds to buy any plan authorized by their state’s insurance commission, he added.

Scott and some other Republicans believe the enhanced subsidies drive up the cost of health insurance for everyone while masking the increase to consumers.

Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) speaks during a hearing with Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Capitol Hill in Washington on Sept. 4, 2025. Madalina Kilroy/The Epoch Times

“Insurers get paid no matter what—and taxpayers get stuck with the tab,” Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) said in a Nov. 7 speech.

Increasing federal payments in the hope of decreasing costs is “like putting a band-aid on a broken bone,” Cassidy said.

“Instead of paying insurance companies to manage our money, let’s trust Americans to manage their own care—with a pre-funded Federal Flexible Spending Account,” he said.

A Flexible Spending Account is similar to a Health Savings Account but is not owned by the individual and does not roll over from year to year.

Addressing Fraud and Abuse

Republicans generally have been reluctant to extend the enhanced subsidies without also addressing abuse of the Obamacare system, which they say rose dramatically after those subsidies were introduced.

The expiration date indicates that the subsidies were not considered a long-term solution, Dr. Mehmet Oz, administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, said in a Fox News interview on Nov. 16.

“It creates incentives for fraud,” he said.

Data indicates that 4.4 million people are enrolled in Obamacare, apparently without their knowledge, Dr. Oz said. He noted that, unlike 80 percent of health insurance holders, this population has never used their coverage for a doctor visit, prescription, or any other medical service.

“There are discussions around extending the subsidies, if we deal with the fraud, waste, and abuse,” Dr. Oz said.

Administrator for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Mehmet Oz speaks during an event in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on Oct. 16, 2025. Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

Temporary Extension

A bipartisan group of House members has introduced a bill to extend certain tax credits for Obamacare enrollees, which are set to expire at the end of the year.

The bill, sponsored by Rep. Jen Kiggans (R-Va.) and Tom Suozzi (D-N.Y.), would extend the “enhanced” premium tax credits for one year, avoiding an abrupt end to a financial benefit many Americans have come to rely on.

“While the enhanced premium tax credit created during the pandemic was meant to be temporary, we should not let it expire without a plan in place. My legislation will protect hardworking Virginians from facing health insurance bills they can’t afford, thus losing much-needed access to care,” Kiggans said in a statement.

Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), a retiring lawmaker who helped negotiate the end of the shutdown, voiced optimism that a bipartisan solution is possible.

“I think there are a number of them who are very serious [about working to lower health coverage costs],” Shaheen told reporters on Nov. 10. She added that any solution would have to address the expiring subsidies.

Separately, a group of 32 bipartisan House members wrote to Senate leaders asking that they be included in any discussions on the upcoming health care reform vote.

“If we work together, our hope is that the bill will not only achieve a sixty-vote majority in the Senate, but will also then move to the House for immediate consideration and passage,” the group wrote, led by Kiggans and Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.).

Adding Income Cap

Reps. Sam Liccardo (D-Calif.) and Kevin Kiley (R-Calif.) have introduced legislation to control the cost of extending the enhanced subsidies by imposing an income cap on recipients.

Currently, anyone earning over four times the federal poverty level can qualify for the subsidy. This proposal would cap enrollment at six times the poverty level, or $192,900 for a family of four.

“This will provide short-term relief while we tackle broader reforms to lower the cost of care,” Kiley said in a Nov. 10 statement.

The plan would save approximately $5 billion over two years, the congressmen estimated.

The Senate is expected to vote on changes to Obamacare by mid-December.

That gives the 20 states and the District of Columbia that operate their own Obamacare marketplaces, plus the federal marketplace, about two weeks to make adjustments to their subsidy offers before 2026 coverage begins. Annual enrollment for Obamacare has been open since Nov. 1.

Any solution approved by the Senate must then pass the House and be signed by the president to become law.

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/18/2025 - 10:05

Elliott Mgmnt Builds 'Large' Stake In Barrick Mining As Central Bank Gold Buying Accelerates

Elliott Mgmnt Builds 'Large' Stake In Barrick Mining As Central Bank Gold Buying Accelerates

Elliott Management has built a large stake in Barrick Mining Corp., the Financial Times reported, citing people familiar with the matter.

Elliott’s stake - valued at at least $700 million - puts it among Barrick’s 10 biggest investors, the FT cited the people as saying, and comes after the Canadian gold giant struggled to benefit from the metal’s rally.

Bloomberg reports that Barrick Interim CEO Mark Hill recently said he’s “shifting the focus” to assets in North America, where the company owns a bundle of lucrative gold mines that have considerable potential to expand. Previously, projects in Asia and Africa were at the core of the growth strategy.

Barrick Mining is trading around 4% higher in the pre-market, at its highest since 2012...

...notably outperforming gold in the last few weeks...

Elliott's reported 'buy the dip' of Barrick comes as Goldman Sachs precious metals team notes that central banks are also accelerating their buying of the barbarous relic.

The timing, size and speed of last Monday’s price increase are consistent with Asian central bank buying, which often appears in London prices around Asian trading hours and thus sees an initial decrease in the Shanghai-London price premium but is then often followed by delayed momentum buying in retail China and then the West.

We continue to see elevated central bank gold accumulation as a multi-year trend as central banks diversify their reserves to hedge geopolitical and financial risks.

Goldman's nowcast of central bank and institutional gold demand on the London OTC estimates September purchases at 64 tonnes (67 tonnes on a 12-month moving-average basis), up from 21 tonnes in August and consistent with the typical post-summer seasonal acceleration...

Estimated purchases were led by the Middle East - Qatar at 20 tonnes and Oman at 7 tonnes — and China at 15 tonnes...

The pickup in central bank buying, together with the largest monthly gold Western ETF inflow (112 tonnes) since mid-2022, marks the first time in this cycle that strong post-2022 central bank demand and such a sizable increase in ETF holdings have occurred simultaneously.

This combination alongside likely additional off-ETF physical buying by ultra-high net worth individuals (based on client conversations), likely contributed to September’s 10% rally - the strongest monthly increase in gold prices since 2016.

Finally, Goldman still expects continued central bank buying, alongside private investor flows under Fed easing, to lift gold prices to $4,900 by end-2026, with significant upside if the private investor diversification theme were to gain more traction.

Professional subscribers can read Goldman's full Precious Metals team note at our new Marketdesk.ai portal

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/18/2025 - 09:45

Super Creepy 'The World Ahead 2026' Economist Magazine Cover Signals War, Pestilence, & Financial Collapse Next Year

Super Creepy 'The World Ahead 2026' Economist Magazine Cover Signals War, Pestilence, & Financial Collapse Next Year

Authored by Michael Snyder via The End of The American Dream blog,

There is one magazine that represents the interests of the global elite more than any other.  It is known as “The Economist”, and each year it puts out an issue that is dedicated to what is coming in the year ahead.  As we have seen so many times before, these issues tend to be alarmingly accurate.  The reason why they are so accurate is because the ultra-wealthy elite have an enormous amount of influence over the course of human events.  If they are absolutely determined to make something happen, there is a good chance that it is going to happen.  Ominously, it appears that they are anticipating a great deal of global chaos in 2026.

The Economist has been around since 1843, but it has never had a very large readership among the general population.

Ultimately, it is a publication by the elite and for the elite.

According to Wikipedia, it has editorial offices all over the planet but it is primarily based in the city of London…

The Economist is a British news and current affairs journal published in a weekly print magazine format and daily on digital platforms. Variously referred to as a magazine and a newspaper,[6][7] it publishes stories on topics that include economics, business, geopolitics, technology and culture. Mostly written and edited in London,[8] it has other editorial offices in the United States and in major cities in continental Europe, Asia, and the Middle East.[9][8] The publication prominently features data journalism, and has a focus on interpretive analysis over original reporting, to both criticism and acclaim.

Many of the wealthiest families in Europe are among the shareholders of the company, and Sir Evelyn Robert de Rothschild was actually the chairman from the early 1970s to the late 1980s

Aside from the Agnelli family, smaller shareholders in the company include CadburyRothschild (21%), SchroderLayton and other family interests as well as a number of staff and former staff shareholders.[37][43] A board of trustees formally appoints the editor, who cannot be removed without its permission. The Economist Newspaper Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary of The Economist Group. Sir Evelyn Robert de Rothschild was chairman of the company from 1972 to 1989.

If you want to know what the global elite are thinking, this is the publication that you need to be reading.

And the cover for “The World Ahead 2026” issue is perhaps the most ominous that they have ever published…

When you look at that cover, what stands out to you?

To me, the fact that there are so many symbols relating to war really got my attention.

There is a huge red tank on one side of the cover, and another huge red tank on the other side of the cover.

At the top there are several large missiles that look like they are ready to be launched, and at the bottom there are more large missiles.

Also, right in the middle we see two enormous swords that are crossed.

That is clearly meant to symbolize war.

Obviously they believe that war will continue to be a major theme in 2026, and that is something that I have been consistently warning about.

And they also seem to think that certain individuals will continue to be major players in world affairs during the coming year.

Volodymyr Zelensky is clearly visible in the upper right hand portion of the cover.

Xi Jinping, Vladimir Putin and Benjamin Netanyahu appear to be depicted on the left hand portion of the cover.

And just like last year, Donald Trump is right in the middle.

On Monday, Trump refused to rule out the possibility of sending U.S. ground troops into Venezuela

Asked if he would rule out US troops on the ground in Venezuela, Trump replied: “No I don’t rule out that, I don’t rule out anything.

“We just have to take care of Venezuela,” he added. “They dumped hundreds of thousands of people into our country from prisons.”

Personally, I think that this is a trap.

If we go to war with Venezuela, a large portion of our military forces will be tied up and our relations with the rest of the world will greatly suffer.

And Trump is also suggesting that military strikes in Mexico and Colombia could be coming

President Trump hinted at being open to sending military strikes to Mexico and Colombia in order to stop drugs on Monday, sending chills across the region.

The president made the comments during a press conference on Monday as he hosted a meeting with FIFA President Gianni Infantino and the White House task force on the 2026 World Cup at the Oval Office.

“Would I launch strikes on Mexico to stop drugs? It’s OK with me. Whatever we have to do to stop drugs. Mexico is…look I looked at Mexico City over the weekend. There’s some big problems over there. If we had to would we do there what we’ve done to the waterways? You know there is almost no drugs coming through our waterways anymore. Isn’t it down like 85%?” the president said.

On the other side of the globe, I expect the conflict between Israel and Iran to erupt again, I expect the war in Ukraine to continue to escalate, and I will be watching China very, very closely.

Getting back to the magazine cover, I also noticed that there is a chart that seems to depict some sort of a financial crash right under the crossed swords.

And not too far below that chart, there is a red image of a broken dollar sign.

In addition, throughout the bottom half of the graphic it looks like paper currency is falling everywhere.

Wow.

Obviously they are trying to communicate something about the global economy, and it certainly isn’t good.

Will 2026 be a year of financial collapse?

We won’t have to wait too long to find out.

I also noticed two gigantic syringes near the bottom of the cover.

And throughout the cover there are lots of “pills” floating around.

I started to count them, but there are just too many.

So what does this mean?

Are they suggesting that another global pandemic is on the way?

Will 2026 be a year when people are taking shots and pills to try to protect themselves from a major pestilence that has broken out?

Interestingly, an outbreak of the Marburg virus has just been confirmed in Ethiopia

Ethiopia has confirmed an outbreak of the deadly Marburg virus in the south of the country, the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC) said on Saturday.

The Marburg virus is one of the deadliest known pathogens. Like Ebola, it causes severe bleeding, fever, vomiting and diarrhea and has a 21-day incubation period.

Also like Ebola, it is transmitted via contact with bodily fluids and has a fatality rate of between 25 and 80 per cent.

The head of the World Health Organization, Ethiopia’s Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, confirmed on Friday that at least nine cases had been detected in southern Ethiopia, two days after Africa CDC was alerted to a suspected haemorrhagic virus in the region.

Personally, I am convinced that pestilence will be a major theme in 2026.

I hope that all of you have been getting ready for that.

Lastly, I wanted to mention the giant raised fist near the top of the cover.

A raised fist has been the primary symbol of resistance to the Trump administration.

And I don’t think that it is an accident that the giant raised fist has been placed right on top of the American flag in this graphic.

Are the global elite planning civil unrest in major U.S. cities in 2026?

We know that they have been lavishly funding far left protest groups in this country.

Will 2026 be a year when mass protests against Trump go to the next level?

I think that is their plan.

I think that they fully intend to unleash chaos, and that fits perfectly with what I am expecting too.

Unfortunately for the elite, I do not believe that they will be able to control the chaos that is coming.

We really are right on the brink of a global nightmare, and once it starts nobody is going to be able to wake up from it.

Michael’s new book entitled “10 Prophetic Events That Are Coming Next” is available in paperback and for the Kindle on Amazon.com, and you can subscribe to his Substack newsletter at michaeltsnyder.substack.com.

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/18/2025 - 09:30

Valar Atomics Achieves Cold Criticality With Project NOVA

Valar Atomics Achieves Cold Criticality With Project NOVA

California-based reactor developer Valar Atomics announced the milestone achievement of obtaining criticality under Project NOVA in collaboration with the Department of Energy's (DOE) Los Alamos National Lab (LANL). Criticality was achieved at 11:45 AM PT on November 17th.

Zero-power criticality, or “cold criticality”, is the foundational milestone which precedes nuclear operation with power. It is a self-sustaining chain reaction of uranium-235 within a nuclear core, but without reaching full operating temperatures or actively removing heat with a working fluid. Zero-power criticality allows a greater understanding of the neutronic characteristics of the core and a verification of assumptions about fuel, moderators, active reactivity control, and burnable poisons.

Valar Atomics is a relatively new nuclear startup that has secured $130 million in funding, with participation from Anduril founder Palmer Luckey and Palantir CTO Shyam Sankar, among other investors. Valar's business model involves mass-producing small modular reactors and clustering them at large sites, or "gigasites," to power data centers and industrial processes independently of the traditional electricity grid. Unlike many of its peers, Valar is developing advanced nuclear reactors that use a high-temperature gas reactor (HTGR) design with TRISO fuel and helium as a coolant.

Valar's Project NOVA (Nuclear Observations of Valar Atomics) is currently being conducted at LANL’s National Criticality Experiments Research Center (NCERC) in Nevada. The criticality test began five days earlier on November 12th, as the approach to initial criticality is a slow and controlled process. The reactor being tested is a “zero-power” design, meaning it's not intended to output thermal energy for conversion to electricity. The primary purpose is to obtain physics data to confirm design characteristics of the Ward250, their reactor included in the DOE’s Reactor Pilot Project.

Adam Stein, the Director for Nuclear Energy Innovation at The Breakthrough Institute, commented “achieving cold criticality represents a milestone for Reactor Pilot Program participants and meets the goal outlined in the recent executive order. This is one step of many toward a functional commercial product”.

NCERC has been used for decades to perform reactor and nuclear weapon physics testing. The recent core physics testing with the Deimos experiment laid the foundation for the NOVA testing. Deimos was the first test in decades using TRISO fuels pellets with HALEU fuel. The benchmarks developed from the Deimos test, along with some of the core’s outer structure, enabled Valar to rapidly achieve this criticality-focused project.

“Valar Atomics provided the reactor core, TRISO fuel, and system configuration.

LANL/ NCERC provided the critical assembly, facility safety envelope, experimentalists, test instrumentation, experiment platform and reflectors, data analysis, and validation oversight”

Valar’s announcement hasn't discussed the licensing or regulatory pathways that were utilized to enable the criticality testing, but it can be assumed the company coordinated the required permissions and certifications through the DOE, not the NRC. They also likely leveraged the previous data from the Deimos experiment and the lower risk nature of a zero-power reactor to obtain authorization faster.

The other leading reactor developer of micro-HTGRs, Radiant Nuclear, submitted its DOE Authorization Request for Kaleidos (DARK) to the DOE for review. Approval is anticipated by the end of the year. Radiant is pursuing reactor testing at the Demonstration of Microreactor Experiments (DOME) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL).

To provide the comparison between the Project NOVA test and the DOME test — Valar is performing the precursor testing that would be done prior to a test like the one Radiant is about to do at INL. Similar to the testing Valar’s Ward250 reactor will perform in Utah, Radiant will be performing testing for their Kaleidos reactor design add a higher power level than what Project NOVA is achieving, for which the collected data will be used for the eventual NRC licensing of their commercial designs.

In May, President Trump announced the goal of three reactors obtaining criticality prior to July 4th, 2026. The DOE is pursuing this goal by providing 11 reactor projects expedited licensing pathways to take their reactors from powerpoint to actual operations. Valar’s designated reactor, the Ward250, is a High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor (HTGR) designed for 100kW. They recently broke ground at their construction site in Utah and claim to be on track to meet the President’s target.

Valar's Ward 250 High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor

The initial criticality achievement is the first of six total configurations that will be tested for physics data collecting, enabling the eventual testing of the Ward250, as well as future research at the NCERC.

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/18/2025 - 09:10

ADP Employment Report Signals Rebound In Labor Market; Claims Confirm Resilience

ADP Employment Report Signals Rebound In Labor Market; Claims Confirm Resilience

For the four weeks ending Oct. 31, 2025, private employers shed an average of 2,500 jobs a week, according to ADP's new weekly employment report update, suggesting that the labor market improved significantly in the last week (from an 11,250 average drop during the prior week).

Extrapolating with some simple math that implies a monthly drop of 10,000 jobs...

While job growth is admittedly sluggish, ADP reports that new hires are on the upswing:

In October, new hires accounted for 4.4 percent of all employees, ADP payroll data shows, up from 3.9 percent a year ago.

This growing share of new hires would seem to run counter to the slowed pace of hiring. That contradiction tells us a lot about today’s jobs market.  

New hires typically fluctuates with the business cycle, but the aging U.S. workforce means that demographics have begun playing a bigger role in hiring decisions.

Employers are hiring to replace existing workers, not increase headcount.

ADP continues to note that employers are taking on a bigger share of new hires, even amid a slowdown in job creation.

This suggests that more workers are heading for the exits.  

Demographic data also suggests that the drop in new hires isn’t due to normal business cycle dynamics. Thirty-six percent of U.S. workers are 55 or older. In 2015, less than 25 percent U.S. workers were that old. 

This change has put employers on new footing. Increasingly, hiring is no longer driven primarily by customer demand and economic fluctuations, but by a need to replace a growing number of departing workers.

Additionally, after more than six weeks of government shutdown, official macro data is starting to flow... but it's lagged.

The number of Americans applying for jobless benefits for the first time totaled 232,000 in the week ended Oct. 18, according to the Labor Department website. This print certainly shows no sign of the potential weakness that many have anticipated (but then again it's a month old).

Source: Bloomberg

However, unadjusted state-level claims data was released, and that confirmed a pick up in initial jobless benefit demands... especially in the 'Deep TriState'...

Source: Bloomberg

Continuing jobless claims picked up, but remains below mid-summer highs...

Source: Bloomberg

So, now we know that a month ago, claims data showed a still resilient labor market.. but we also know - based on private data suppliers - that job cut announcements have accelerated notably...

Source: Bloomberg

So, choose your own adventure with this data. We suspect there will be a lot more of this in the next few days as more and more (delayed) data is released.

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/18/2025 - 08:40

Futures, Bitcoin Tumble, Extending Longest Losing Streak Since August

Futures, Bitcoin Tumble, Extending Longest Losing Streak Since August

US equity futures are sharply lower again - but off session lows - after the S&P 500 and Nasdaq closed below their 50-day moving averages for the first time since April; both tech and small caps are lagging as the market tries to find a level as the bond market continues to reduce the probability of a further Fed easing. As of 8:00am. S&P futures are -0.6%, set for the longest losing streak since late August. Nasdaq 100 contracts were also -0.6%. Pre-market, Mag7 names are mostly lower with AAPL/GOOG in the green and Semis are weaker. Cyclicals are poised to lag Defensives as the risk-off tone continues. Bitcoin has also pared its drop to 0.4%, having earlier fallen below $90,000 for the first time since April with traders are betting on even more downside. Rotation trades helped to support the overall market last week, but both the Dow and Russell 2000 underperformed yesterday. Topping the list of worries are AI valuations and whether the Fed will cut rates next month. Fund manager positioning (crowded in stocks and low on cash) is also a possible headwind, according to BofA.  Treasuries were the main beneficiaries as investors continued to seek havens, with the 10-year yield falling four basis points to 4.09%. Gold fluctuated above $4,000 an ounce. The dollar was little changed.  The macro data focus is old Aug / Sep data being released but ultimately the market awaits NVDA and NFP; the Fed Meeting Minutes may give additional color on the Fed’s reaction function into the Dec meeting.

In premarket trading, most Mag 7 names are lower: Microsoft (MSFT) falls 1.5% and Amazon (AMZN) is down 1.8%, underperforming Magnificent Seven peers after Rothschild & Co Redburn downgraded the stocks for the first time since initiating coverage in June 2022. Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) is up 0.6% after Loop Capital upgraded the Google parent to buy from hold. Apple (AAPL) +0.4%, Meta Platforms (META) -0.7%, Tesla (TSLA) -0.8%, Nvidia (NVDA) -1.1%

  • Barrick Mining (B) is up 2.5% after the Financial Times reported that Elliott Management has built a “large” stake in the gold miner.
  • Home Depot (HD) falls 3.5% after the retailer reported comparable sales and adjusted EPS for the third quarter that missed the consensus estimates. They also reduced the annual EPS guidance.
  • Honeywell International (HON) falls 2.1% after BofA Global Research cut the recommendation on the industrial giant to underperform from buy, becoming the lone sell-equivalent rating in Bloomberg data. BofA expects shares to lag as elements of its spinoff strategy disappoint investors and the company doesn’t deliver earnings growth next year.
  • Medtronic (MDT) is up 3.5% after the medical device maker lifted the bottom end of its range for adjusted profit forecast for the year.
  • Molina Healthcare (MOH) is up 3.1% after hedge fund manager Michael Burry touted the health insurer in a X post.

In corporate news, Apple’s iPhone 17 series drove a 37% rise in its monthly smartphone sales in the key China market, according to Counterpoint Research. Akzo Nobel agreed to acquire smaller rival paint maker Axalta Coating Systems in a €7.9 billion ($9.2 billion) deal. Baidu posted its biggest quarterly revenue slide on record, despite major AI spending.

The ongoing global rout underscored continued unease over interest rates and technology earnings, with Nvidia Corp.’s report on Wednesday poised to test investor nerves over lofty valuations in the artificial-intelligence sector. Focus will then turn to the delayed September jobs report due Thursday, a key gauge for the Federal Reserve’s policy outlook. With all the talk of a potential bubble in AI, most recently with comments from JPMorgan Vice Chairman Daniel Pinto, Nvidia earnings on Wednesday are crucial for market direction. The report “will be the ultimate ‘blue or red pill’ moment for the market,” said Stephan Kemper, chief investment strategist at BNP Paribas Wealth Management. Options suggest an earnings-related move of about 6.4%, roughly matching Nvidia’s recent average, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. 

“The question is whether the selloff will continue after Nvidia’s results,” said Eric Bleines, a fund manager at SwissLife Gestion Privée in Paris. “This will make the difference between the market just taking a breather or going for a correction.”

Additionally, traders have less conviction about that, with interest-rate swaps now implying a less-than-50% likelihood of a December rate reduction. Several Fed officials have recently cautioned against a cut, although Governor Waller repeated his view in favor of lowering rates. 

“A bit of volatility and a pullback into year-end was on Santa’s wish list for a majority of institutional accounts,” wrote Mohit Kumar, chief economist and strategist for Europe at Jefferies. “Apart from retail investors, we do not think there is a lot of pain on the street.”

Meanwhile, in a sign that US government agencies were resuming operations after the longest shutdown on record, the Labor Department’s website showed 232,000 initial jobless claims for the week ended Oct. 18. Data for the previous three weeks weren’t available. Weekly employment estimates from ADP Research due later Tuesday will offer more insight into the labor market.

Barclays strategists led by Anshul Gupta said Nvidia’s results and the September payrolls report will shape near-term sentiment. They see potential upside for the chipmaker amid accelerating AI investment and rising demand for computing infrastructure, but note the stock has posted negative one-week returns in four of its last five earnings periods. 

European stocks followed their Asian counterparts lower, with the Stoxx 600 down 1.3% and looking at a fourth day of losses, with mining and auto shares leading declines, while health care and personal care equities are the biggest outperformers. Here are the biggest movers Tuesday:

  • Roche shares gain as much as 7% after the drugmaker announced its phase 3 study evaluating investigational giredestrant as an adjuvant endocrine treatment for people with ER-positive, HER2-negative, early-stage breast cancer met its primary endpoint at a pre-planned interim analysis
  • Rheinmetall shares rise as much as 4.7% after the German maker of tanks and ammunition said it is targeting sales of about €50 billion in 2030, while also providing guidance around margins and cash conversion
  • Imperial Brands climbs as much as 3.2% after reporting its full-year results and outlining guidance for 2026. Panmure Liberum says the tobacco company’s results are on “the right side” of in-line
  • Greencore Group shares jump as much as 6.7% after the food producer posted earnings ahead of expectations
  • Mining shares are the worst performers in Europe on Tuesday, falling as much as 3.2%, as aluminum and copper declined ahead of publication of delayed US economic data
  • UK lenders were among the worst-performing banks in Europe on Tuesday amid tax worries ahead of Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves’s budget announcement on Nov. 26
  • Umicore shares dropped as much as 14% after a vehicle of holder Groupe Bruxelles Lambert sold roughly €300 million worth of shares in the chemicals company in an overnight placing
  • ABB shares drop as much as 4.7%, the most in seven months, after the provider of power and automation technologies updated its financial goals ahead of its capital markets day
  • Crest Nicholson shares fall as much as 12%, most since August 2024, as the UK housebuilder forecasts full-year profits at the low end of the range analysts expected

Earlier in the session, Asian stocks dropped, poised for a third-straight session of losses, as concerns about an artificial intelligence bubble returned to the fore ahead of Nvidia’s earnings report. The MSCI Asia Pacific Index fell as much as 2.4%, dipping below its 50-day moving average for the first time since April. A sub-gauge of technology shares led a broad decline across all sectors, with chipmakers TSMC and SK Hynix the biggest drags. Most markets in the region were in the red, with gauges in South Korea, Taiwan and Japan down more than 2% each. Concerns of AI overexuberance dominated sentiment as investors awaited Nvidia earnings due Thursday morning in Asia. A filing showed Peter Thiel’s hedge fund sold its entire stake in the chip-maker in the third quarter, adding fuel to market concerns over sector valuations. Tensions between Beijing and Tokyo impacted markets for a second day, with Korean travel shares advancing after China warned its citizens against visiting Japan. Meanwhile, analysts said Philippine stocks could face more headwinds due to political instability as President Ferdinand Marcos reshuffles his cabinet.

In FX, the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index is little changed with not much movement versus the majors.

In rates, treasuries advance, with US 10-year yields falling 3 bps to 4.10%. UK and German government bonds also rise. Treasury futures hold gains with stock futures lower and technology sector in focus. Focal points of US session include weekly ADP jobs data and three scheduled Fed speakers. Treasury yields are richer by as much as 4bp-5bp in front-end and belly, outperforming long end and steepening the curve; 2s10s spread is about 1bp wider, 5s30s about 2bp; 10-year near 4.10% is about 2bp richer vs German counterpart, about 4bp vs UK. Treasury auctions this week include $16 billion 20-year bonds on Wednesday and $19 billion 10-year TIPS Thursday. 

In commodities, spot gold is steady near $4,040/oz. Brent is trading near session highs, around $64.38.

Looking ahead, today's US economic calendar includes ADP weekly jobs data (8:15am), August factory orders (10am) and September TIC flows (4pm); initial jobless claims in the week ended Oct. 18 numbered 232k in data posted to Labor Department website after being delayed by US government shutdown. Fed speaker slate includes Barr (10:30am), Barkin (11am) and Logan (7:55pm) On the corporate side, Home Depot reports earnings.

Market Snapshot

  • S&P 500 mini -0.6%
  • Nasdaq 100 mini -0.6%
  • Russell 2000 mini -0.7%
  • Stoxx Europe 600 -1.2%
  • DAX -1.2%
  • CAC 40 -1.2%
  • 10-year Treasury yield -3 basis points at 4.1%
  • VIX +0.8 points at 23.16
  • Bloomberg Dollar Index little changed at 1220.57
  • euro little changed at $1.1581
  • WTI crude -0.2% at $59.8/barrel

Top Overnight News

  • White House officials are insisting that latest tariff relief doesn't amount to a retreat from the president's staunch defense of tariffs as economic drivers, as critics say the White House is capitulating on its signature economics policy. NBC
  • US initial jobless claims totaled 232,000 in the week ended Oct. 18, according to US Labor Department website showing historical data. The data’s release had been affected the government shutdown. BBG
  • Mark Carney won a key budget vote by the slimmest of margins in Canada’s Parliament, ensuring the survival of his government and avoiding an election. BBG
  • Hong Kong bankers and regulators are showing signs of growing concern about the city’s deepest real estate downturn since the Asian financial crisis. BBG
  • China has bought nearly a million tons of US soybeans, a move that ends a temporary pause and appears to signal commitment to a trade truce agreed late last month. BBG
  • Governor Kazuo Ueda told Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi that the Bank of Japan is in the process of slowly dialing back its easing support for the economy, signaling his unshaken intention to carefully raise rates. BBG
  • Banking execs in the EU are bracing to be disappointed when officials lay out proposals to cut red tape in the coming weeks, as they predict that the measures will be far behind the deregulation taking place in the US. BBG
  • Apple’s iPhone 17 series drove a 37% rise in monthly smartphone sales in China. BBG
  • Home Depot (-3% premkt) cut its full-year earnings guidance, warning that some unsteady consumers are hitting the pause button on big-ticket home purchases. A modest miss was expected. Goldman thinks expectations were for a very small cut and it feels like we could say this was slightly worse than expectations.
  • This earnings season, the share of firms discussing AI-related productivity on earnings calls has been highest within Communication Services and Financials. This quarter, 74% of Comm Services companies and 66% of Financials companies mentioned AI in the context of efficiency on their conference calls. AI-related productivity mentions were lowest in Utilities, Energy, and Materials. GIR
  • JPMorgan COO Pinto says the US economy is not likely to enter a recession. On AI, says, there is likely to be a "correction" in AI valuations at some point. Upside for the S&P from here is relatively limited.
  • US President Trump said he wants 1% inflation: BBG 

Trade/Tariffs

  • EU Trade Commissioner Sefcovic says the EU plans to introduce restrictions on EU exports of aluminium scrap.
  • German Finance Minister on rare earths says Germany must do its homework and diversify supply chains.

A more detailed look at global markets courtesy of Newquawk

APAC stocks extended losses throughout the session following a similar lead from Wall Street, which had seen heavy losses on Monday. Overall newsflow in APAC hours was quiet, although tech stocks were among the laggards in the region. ASX 200 showed a clear defensive bias across its sectors, with tech the hardest hit. No obvious reaction was seen to the RBA minutes, which largely emphasised uncertainty and data-dependence. Nikkei 225 edged lower after the open and eventually surrendered the 49,000 level, falling as much as 3% intraday. Several additional factors on top of the global risk aversion could've exacerbated losses, including woes surrounding Japan–China relations and the recent JPY and long-end JGB weakness. Several Japanese officials verbally intervened throughout the session but failed to sway the index meaningfully. KOSPI lagged as the index joined the global stock rout, following the prior day's outperformance. Hang Seng and Shanghai Comp opened in the red and initially conformed to regional losses, with Hong Kong underperforming the Mainland amid its tech exposure.

Top Asian News

  • BoJ Governor Ueda says he discussed the economy, inflation and monetary policy with Japanese PM Takaichi. Will decide on monetary policy while scrutinising various data. FX was discussed, won't comment on details. Desirable for FX to move to reflect fundamentals.
  • Japanese Finance Minister Katayama said she is keeping an eye on markets with regard to fiscal policy and would not comment on FX levels, adding she is alarmed over FX moves; she said currencies should move in a stable manner reflecting fundamentals, and that the government will thoroughly monitor for excessive or disorderly forex fluctuations with a high sense of urgency. She noted concern over recent one-sided, rapid FX moves and said that while GDP avoided the worst, negative growth justifies a sizeable package, according to Reuters.
  • Japan’s Economy Minister Kiuchi said long-term rate moves are determined by markets and that the government is watching market moves — including long-term rates — closely, according to Reuters.
  • RBA November meeting minutes said it is appropriate in the current environment to remain cautious and data-dependent, with members determined they could remain patient while assessing incoming data on the extent of spare capacity. On rates, the minutes noted a mixed picture on whether policy remains restrictive — in contrast with the clearer signals seen in 2024 — and said the cash rate could be held at its current level if demand recovers more strongly than expected, while policy easing is still seen if the labour market weakens materially or growth disappoints; the Board said it is not possible to be confident about which scenario is more likely. The minutes said there may be a little more underlying inflationary pressure than previously assessed, noted the AUD remains close to equilibrium estimates, and said global growth is likely to slow in H2 2025, though the likelihood of a severe downside scenario has diminished, according to Reuters.

European bourses (STOXX 600 -1.3%) opened lower across the board, in a continuation of the downbeat mood seen in Wall St and in APAC trade overnight. Indices found a base in early morning trade, where they have resided throughout the morning so far. European sectors are entirely in the red, and hold a clear defensive bias. Healthcare tops the pile, buoyed by strength in Roche (+5.6%), after a positive trial update related to a breast cancer pill. To the downside, Autos, Tech and Basic Resources are all pressured. US equity futures (ES -0.2%, NQ -0.2%, RTY -0.2%) are modestly lower across the board, albeit not to the extent seen in Europe. Traders count down their clocks till NVIDIA earnings on Wednesday, but before that markets will have some US data (Durable Goods, Weekly ADP Average Estimate) and a couple of Fed speakers. Earlier, a surprise jobless claims release (w/e 18th Oct) had little impact on contracts.

Top European News

  • EU Commission says definitive measures imposed consist of country-specific tariff rate quotas per type of ferroalloy, limiting the volume of imports to enter the EU duty free.

FX

  • DXY is currently choppy and trades within a busy 99.39 to 99.60 range. Initial action saw the index buoyed by the downbeat risk tone, where the USD was pressured by typical haven currencies such as the JPY & CHF whilst the Antipodeans lagged. Thereafter, the risk tone improved a touch and the Dollar dipped to make a session low – a move which also came amidst a surprise US weekly claims release. Do note that the weekly claims release is a delayed report for the w/e Oct 18th; it printed at 232k, whilst continuing claims printed at 1.957mln. Looking ahead, ADP will release its weekly US jobs gauge; last week, it reported that its average weekly estimate was -11,250. US factory orders are expected to have risen by 1.4% M/M in August (prev. -1.3%); durable goods revisions for August are also due today. NAHB's housing market index is seen unchanged at 37 in November. Fed's Barr (voter) and Fed's Barkin (2027 voter) are set to speak, while Fed's Logan (2026 voter) will deliver remarks after the close.
  • EUR is currently flat/mildly lower and largely moving at the whim of the Dollar given the lack of pertinent European newsflow. Initially flat vs the Dollar, then caught a bid to make a fresh session high above the 1.1600 mark – before once again reversing. Bid seemingly in the moments preceding the US jobless claims figures. Currently towards lows at 1.1583.
  • JPY is also flat vs the USD, but began the European session a little firmer, having benefited from the subdued risk tone seen overnight. That downbeat sentiment has remained this morning, with equities continuing to reside firmly in the red – albeit have stabilised just off worst levels. For Japan specifically, a number of key sticking points; 1) a meeting between BoJ Governor Ueda and PM Takaichi, 2) China-Japan tensions, 3) ongoing verbal intervention.
  • GBP is steady vs the USD, but as above, was subject to some two-way action surrounding the US jobless claims data. Currently trading in a 1.3146 to 1.3176 range. Focus for the day will be on commentary from BoE's Pill and Dhingra this afternoon, and then will shift to the UK's inflation report on Wednesday. A dataset which has heightened focused, given BoE Governor Bailey highlighted inflation developments at the most recent confab - he is likely to be the deciding vote ahead in December; markets currently assign a 79% chance of a 25bps reduction at that meeting. More pertinent for the GBP are budget-related updates. Most recently, The Telegraph reported that UK Chancellor Reeves is reportedly considering a last-minute raid on banking profits in the budget. This would be a politically favourable move, but perhaps overshadowed by the growth-related implications of such a move, and boost concerns re. the UK’s investment attractiveness.
  • Antipodeans were initially the clear underperformers vs the USD overnight and into the European morning – though as the session progressed, that move has since stabilised. AUD is essentially flat and trades within a 0.6466 to 0.6499 range whilst the Kiwi is marginally firmer and trades within a 0.5639 to 0.5669 range.

Fixed Income

  • USTs started the day on a firmer footing, buoyed by the risk tone, and have continued to grind higher as the morning progressed. USTs at a 112-19 peak, posting gains of nine ticks at most. Eclipsing Monday’s 112-24+ best but stopping just shy of a cluster from last week between 113-01+ to 113-04+. Upside this morning was also spurred by a surprise release from the Department of Labour, jobless claims at 232k in the October 18th week and continuing at 1.957mln (prev. 1.947mln); no direct comparison to initial, the last release was 219k for the week of September 20th. Notably, the move in US fixed income assets to the release was fairly muted in nature. Potentially a function of participants awaiting more timely series and/or the hard data to begin to be released in the next few days and weeks before reassessing their position in December. Ahead, we get the latest ADP series (not the BLS reference period), a handful of other prints and remarks from Fed’s Barr (voter) and Barkin (2026) on supervision and the economic outlook respectively.
  • Bunds are bid, in-fitting with the above. Lifted across the early European morning before seeing a bit of a pullback just after the cash equity open and in proximity to the time of the discussed US jobless claims series. A pullback that was possibly a function of cash equity benchmarks opening slightly better than futures had implied at their worst and/or participants being caught off guard by the DOL release. Since, Bunds have resumed their climb and are towards highs of 128.90 as the European tone remains subdued overall and the fixed income complex generally moves higher.
  • Gilts are also moving alongside peers. Currently at the top-end of a 92.41 to 92.60 bound. Specifics for the UK light today, as we count down to Wednesday’s CPI release for confirmation that inflation has peaked and early insight into the December meeting. UK specifics remain focused on the budget, and while there have been a handful of pertinent updates, primarily relating to domestic banking names, nothing has emerged to significantly change the narrative for rates at this point in time.
  • UK sells GBP 1.25bln 4.75% 2030 Gilt by tender: b/c 3.75x, average yield 3.896%
  • China began marketing a EUR bond sale to raise up to EUR 4bln; guidance was set at mid-swaps +28bps for the 4-year tranche and mid-swaps +38bps for the 7-year tranche, according to Bloomberg and the term sheet.

Commodities

  • Crude benchmarks initially sold off during the APAC session as risk sentiment continued to sour but has pared back on earlier losses at the start of the European session. WTI and Brent dipped to a trough of 59.28/bbl and 63.62/bbl respectively before reversing higher to peak at 59.73/bbl and 64.07/bbl. Benchmarks currently continue to trade towards session highs, to make a fresh peak at USD 59.91/bbl and USD 64.25/bbl, for WTI and Brent respectively.
  • Spot XAU has steadied above USD 4k/oz as the metal continues to struggle to act as a traditional safe haven during US equity selloffs. XAU fell throughout the APAC session from the open at USD 4044/oz to a trough of USD 4004/oz as the European session got underway. The yellow metal briefly dipped below US 4k/oz to a low of 3998/oz before attracting buyers that took price c. USD 45/oz higher to a high of USD 4042/oz as US data got released.
  • Base metals have continued to drop, following the broader risk aversion. 3M LME Copper opened at USD 10.76k/t and gradually fell c. USD 100/t to a trough of USD 10.66k/t. The red metal has managed to find a base at these levels and currently, 3M LME Copper is trading in tight c. USD 70/t band at the lows of the day.
  • Rio Tinto (RIO AT/RIO LN) reduced production at its Yawun alumina refinery to extend its operational life, with output set to decline by 1.2mln tonnes annually and the refinery’s production to be cut by 40% in 2026, according to Reuters.
  • Goldman Sachs says as global LNG supply continues to rise faster than Asia demand, estimates that NW European storage will face congestion in 2028/29 which would pressure TTF and JKM low enough to reduce global LNG supply.
  • Commerzbank expects copper and aluminium to reach USD 12,000/t and USD 3,200/t respectively in 2026. Zinc prices to settle around USD 3,000/t. Nickel prices to settle at USD 16,000/t.

Geopolitics: Middle East

  • The UN Security Council adopted the US-led resolution establishing an international stabilisation force in Gaza, with 13 countries voting in favour while Russia and China abstained, according to Reuters.
  • Hamas said the UN resolution imposes international trusteeship on Gaza, which is rejected by Palestinians and factions, and that the resolution does not meet Palestinian rights and demands, according to Reuters.
  • US President Trump said the US will be selling F-35s (LMT) to Saudi Arabia.

Geopolitics: Ukraine

  • A White House official said President Trump would sign the Russia-sanctions bill if decision-making authority remains, according to Reuters.
  • The US Treasury said sanctions against Rosneft and Lukoil are reducing Russian oil revenues and pushing Russian crude prices to multi-year lows, while Treasury OFAC analysis stated the sanctions may have a long-term negative effect on the volume of Russian oil sales.
  • The Ukrainian military said a Russian missile attack targeted the east of the country, according to Al Arabiya.
  • Ukraine's President Zelenskiy announces plans to go to Turkey on Wednesday to reinvigorate negotiations

Geopolitics: Others

  • Japan’s Trade Minister Akazawa said there are currently no particular changes in China’s export-control measures on rare earths and other products, according to Reuters.
  • North Korea said South Korea’s nuclear-propelled submarine will lead it to arm itself with nuclear weapons and said it will respond to the confrontational stance of the US–South Korea joint factsheet, via KCNA.
  • The US Ambassador to Japan posted that the United States is fully committed to the defence of Japan, including the Senkaku Islands, and said nothing the China Coast Guard flotilla does can change that fact, via X.

US Event Calendar

  • 10:00 am: Nov NAHB Housing Market Index, est. 37, prior 37
  • 10:00 am: Aug Factory Orders, est. 1.4%, prior -1.3%
  • 10:00 am: Aug F Durable Goods Orders, est. 2.9%, prior 2.9%
  • 10:00 am: Aug F Durables Ex Transportation, est. 0.4%, prior 0.4%
  • 10:00 am: Aug F Cap Goods Orders Nondef Ex Air, est. 0.59%, prior 0.6%
  • 10:00 am: Aug F Cap Goods Ship Nondef Ex Air, prior -0.3%
  • 4:00 pm: Sep Total Net TIC Flows
  • 4:00 pm: Sep Net Long-term TIC Flows

Central Bank Speakers

  • 10:30 am: Fed’s Barr Speaks on Bank Supervision at American University
  • 11:00 am: Fed’s Barkin Speaks on the Economic Outlook
  • 7:55 pm: Fed’s Logan Delivers Closing Remarks at Conference

DB's Jim Reid concludes the overnight wrap

It’s been a challenging start to the week as markets brace for two key events: Nvidia’s earnings tomorrow night and the US payrolls report on Thursday. I'm old enough to remember when the US employment report came once a month on a Friday! For now, equities remain under pressure, with the S&P 500 (-0.92%) posting a third consecutive loss for the first time since September and marking its worst three-day run since April (-2.61%) with futures down another half a percent as I type this morning. Concerns swirling around the AI trade pushed Nvidia (-1.88%) to another decline, US HY spreads widened (+5bps), and the VIX index (+2.55pts) closed at a 4-week high of 22.38pts. And there was no respite from the slump in crypto, where Bitcoin (-3.32%) fell to its lowest level since April with another couple of percent of declines seen this morning. It's now down around -4% in 2025 and nearly 30% of its YTD peaks 6 weeks ago.

Those losses for the S&P 500 brought the index below its 50-day moving average, often viewed as an important technical threshold, for the first time in 139 sessions. That was the longest such run since 2007. While AI weakness was a key driver, sending the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index -1.55% lower, it was a day of broad weakness with 407 decliners within the S&P 500, the most in 5 weeks. The small cap Russell 2000 (-1.96%) and the equal-weighted S&P 500 (-1.31%) both fell to their lowest levels since August. The Mag-7 (-0.08%) actually had a better day but this was mostly thanks to Alphabet +(3.11%) which rallied on news that Berkshire Hathaway took a stake in the company last quarter.  Credit spreads ticked a little higher, with US IG and HY spreads +1bps and +5bps wider respectively. Those moves came as Amazon became the latest of the tech giants to tap the bond market, raising $15bn in its first bond offering in three years.

In addition to the AI concerns, the risk-off tone was reinforced by the latest signals from the Fed, as investors continued to price out the likelihood of a December rate cut. Futures now imply just a 41% probability, down from 43% on Friday – with the highest rate priced for the December contract since late August. This hawkish tilt has been evident since Powell’s October press conference, and front-end Treasury yields reflected that, with the 2yr yield (+0.3bps) rising to 3.61% even as the risk-off tone brought 10yr yields lower (-0.9bps to 4.14%). However, the continued risk-off move overnight has helped 2yr and 10yr yields to rally -3.1bps and -2.3bps respectively.

The reason the front-end initially held up was partly driven by a surprisingly strong Empire State manufacturing survey from the NY Fed yesterday. Normally a second-tier release, it grabbed attention given the lingering data backlog from the shutdown. The headline index surged to 18.7 in November (vs. 5.8 expected), its highest in a year, reinforcing the view that the US economy has held up well and the Fed needn’t rush into further cuts.  

The ongoing decline in December cut expectations came despite slightly dovish remarks from Vice Chair Jefferson, who saw the “balance of risks in the economy as having shifted in recent months with increased downside risks to employment compared to the upside risks to inflation, which have likely declined somewhat recently”. That said, he left December open as a data dependent decision. More clearly on the dovish side of the FOMC, we heard from Fed Governor Waller, who repeated the view that the Fed should cut rate again in December, saying that this would “provide additional insurance against an acceleration in the weakening of the labor market”.

The sell-off is continuing overnight with the KOSPI (-3.06%) leading the declines, with the Nikkei (-2.90%) not far behind. Japanese long-bonds continue to sell-off as markets fear a larger-than-expected supplementary budget later this week from the new Takaichi administration. The 40yr bond has hit its highest level, +8bps to 3.68% this morning, with the 30yr is +5.1bps.

Elsewhere, the S&P/ASX 200 (-1.94%) is also seeing large losses after the minutes from the RBA’s November meeting indicated that the central bank remains largely cautious regarding further interest rate cuts. Meanwhile, the Hang Seng (-1.55%) is also trading noticeably lower, with the Shanghai Composite (-0.50%) outperforming. S&P 500 (-0.45%) and NASDAQ 100 (-0.55%) futures are off their session lows but are still declining.

In Europe yesterday, the market moves largely echoed those across the Atlantic, as the STOXX 600 (-0.54%), DAX (-1.20%) and CAC 40 (-0.63%) all posted a third consecutive decline. Futures are showing further declines of around a percent overnight. European bonds matched Treasuries, with yields on 10yr bunds (-0.8bps), OATs (-0.6bps) and BTPs (-2.6bps) all slipping. 10yr Gilts rebounded more (-3.9bps) after a tough Friday session. The European Commission published its autumn forecasts. Growth for the Euro Area in 2025 was revised up to +1.3% (from +0.9%), while 2026 was trimmed to +1.2% (from +1.4%). Inflation forecasts were steady at +2.1% for 2025, but nudged up to +1.9% for 2026.

In reality, the news flow was light yesterday. Canada’s October CPI was mixed: median core CPI eased to +2.9% (vs. +3.0% expected), but headline CPI edged up to +2.2% (vs. +2.1%). A December cut by the Bank of Canada was already seen as unlikely, but the odds fell further to just 3%, from 6% before the weekend.

Looking ahead, today brings comments from Fed officials Barr, Barkin and Logan, alongside the BoE’s Pill and Dhingra. On the corporate side, Home Depot reports earnings.

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/18/2025 - 08:27

Trump Threatens To Cancel World Cup In Seattle After Election Of 'Communist' Mayor

Trump Threatens To Cancel World Cup In Seattle After Election Of 'Communist' Mayor

If Democrats were hoping that the Trump Administration was going to overlook their recent shift towards "democratic socialist" candidates for political office, they should probably rethink their strategy.  Federal dollars and favors are unlikely to flow forth from Washington DC into the pockets of Zohran Mamdani in NYC or Katie Wilson in Seattle.

The two newly elected mayors are perhaps more openly Marxist in their policies than any US politician in recent memory.  While Mamdani has garnered most of the limelight and media attention over the past year, Wilson has not escaped the notice of Donald Trump.  Her political ideas might be even more unhinged than Mamdani's.

Trump has recently touched on the prospect of moving the World Cup, set to take place in Seattle in 2026, out of the city.  He  referred to Wilson as “another beauty” and a “very, very liberal-slash-communist mayor.”  The World Cup is projected to bring in up to $4 billion in tourist cash to Seattle and add a much needed boost to the struggling city's economy. 

Prompted by an Oval Office reporter who asked about Wilson’s election, Trump made what appears to be his first acknowledgment of Seattle’s incoming mayor.  With FIFA President Gianni Infantino by his side, he said of Seattle hosting the games, “If we think there’s going to be the sign of any trouble, I would ask Gianni to move that to a different city. We have a lot of cities who would love to have it number one, and will do it very safely.”

Wilson's campaign appealed to Gen Z voters frustrated with Seattle's exploding cost of living crisis.  Her promises of subsidized housing to subsidized childcare to free public transit and government operated grocery stores are just the beginning. 

In a June 2025 KING5 interview, she described her vision as "Trump-Proofing Seattle" through progressive taxes to fund housing and services, explicitly criticizing corporate influence on land use.  Her strategy calls for converting corporate properties and wealth to "community control."  

In 2020 she was part of a coalition that advocated for a 50% cut to funding for Seattle police (defund the police).  She is also a proponent of continued wealth taxes which have already run a number of companies out of Seattle, causing thousands of job losses and extensive tax revenues.  In response, she argues that businesses should be prevented from leaving the city.

Trump has expressed concerns about safety in Seattle in reference to the World Cup, and his concerns are not unfounded.  In September, Vladimir Putin suggested that he might accept Trump's invitation and attend the World Cup event in the US.  With two of the most important political figures in the world visiting Seattle, security will be paramount. 

Seattle has a reputation as a radical leftist hotbed filled with people who would like to see both Trump and Putin dead; the presence of a radical leftist mayor does not add much confidence. 

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/18/2025 - 08:05

Full Market Cycles: Half Bull And Half Bear

Full Market Cycles: Half Bull And Half Bear

Authored by Lance Roberts via RealInvestmentAdvice.com,

Last week, we discussed the importance of “math” as it relates to valuations and noted the importance of understanding “full market cycles.” To wit:

The math on forward return expectations, given current valuation levels, does not hold up.  The assumption that valuations can fall without the price of the markets being negatively impacted is also grossly flawed. Historical data, as illustrated in the following chart, suggest that valuations do not decline without a significant impact on investment returns. Additionally, it is worth noting that “full market cycles,” which encompass both secular bull and bear periods, recur throughout history.”

What is a “Full Market Cycle”

Many readers asked what I meant by a full market cycle and why it matters today. The chart above showing inflation-adjusted S&P 500 prices since 1871 makes it clear: every bull market is eventually followed by a bear market. Together, these form a full cycle.

Throughout history, bull market cycles are only one-half of the “full market” cycle. This is because during every “bull market” cycle the markets and economy build up excesses that are then “reverted” during the following “bear market.” In the other words, as Sir Issac Newton once stated:

“What goes up, must come down.” 

The current cycle remains incomplete, but history suggests that the second half usually retraces much of the prior gains. Logical downside targets often align with past peaks, such as those in 2000 and 2008..

Note: I am not stating that I “believe” the markets are about to crash to the 2200 level on the S&P 500.  I am simply showing where the previous support intersects with the price. The longer that it takes for the markets to mean revert the higher the intersection point will be. Furthermore, the 2200 level is not out of the question either. Famed investor Jack Bogle stated that over the next decade we are likely to see two more 50% declines.  A 50% decline from current levels would put the market below 3400 which would be in the “ballpark” of completing the current full market cycle.

As I have often stated, I am not bullish or bearish. My job as a portfolio manager is simple; invest money in a manner that creates returns on a short-term basis, but reduces the possibility of catastrophic losses, which wipe out years of growth.

Nobody tends to believe that philosophy until the markets wipe about 40-50% of portfolio values over a relatively short period. But that is why it is crucial to understand that markets do cycle, and this time is likely “not different.”

4-Phases Of A Full Market Cycle

AlphaTrends previously put together an excellent diagram laying out the 4-phases of the full-market cycle. To wit:

“Is it possible to time the market cycle to capture big gains? Like many controversial topics in investing, there is no real professional consensus on market timing. Academics claim that it’s not possible, while traders and chartists swear by the idea.

The following infographic explains the four important phases of market trends, based on the methodology of the famous stock market authority Richard Wyckoff. The theory is that the better an investor can identify these phases of the market cycle, the more profits can be made on the ride upwards of a buying opportunity.”

So, the question to answer, obviously, is:

“Where are we now?”

Let’s take a look at the past two full-market cycles, using Wyckoff’s methodology, as compared to the current post-financial-crisis half-cycle. While actual market cycles will not exactly replicate the chart above, you can clearly see Wyckoff’s theory in action.

The Dot.Com Cycle

The accumulation phase, following the 1991 recessionary environment, was evident as it preceded the “internet trading boom” and the rise of the “dot.com” bubble from 1995-1999. As I noted previously:

“Following the recession of 1991, the Federal Reserve drastically lowered interest rates to spur economic growth. However, the two events which laid the foundation for the ‘dot.com’ crisis was the rule-change which allowed the nation’s pension funds to own equities and the repeal of Glass-Steagall, which unleashed Wall Street upon a nation of unsuspecting investors.

The major banks could now use their massive balance sheet to engage in investment-banking, market-making, and proprietary trading. The markets exploded as money flooded the financial markets. Of course, since there were not enough ‘legitimate’ deals to fill demand and Wall Street bankers are paid to produce deals, Wall Street floated any offering it could despite the risk to investors.”

The distribution phase became evident in early-2000 as stocks began to struggle.

Names like Enron, WorldCom, Global Crossing, Lucent Technologies, Nortel, Sun Micro, and a host of others, are “ghosts of the past.” Importantly, they are the relics of an era the majority of investors in the market today are unaware of, but were the poster children for the “greed and excess” of the preceding bull market frenzy.

As the distribution phase gained traction, it is worth remembering the media and Wall Street were touting the continuation of the bull market indefinitely into the future. 

Then, came the decline.

The Housing Boom

Following the “dot.com” crash, investors had all learned their lessons about the value of managing risk in portfolios, not chasing returns, and focusing on capital preservation as the core for long-term investing.

Okay. Not really.

It took about 27-minutes for investors to completely forget about the previous pain of the bear market and jump headlong back into the creation of the next bubble leading to the “financial crisis.” 

During the mark-up phase, investors once again piled into leverage. This time not just into stocks, but real estate, as well as Wall Street, found a new way to extract capital from Main Street through the creation of exotic loan structures. Of course, everything was fine as long as interest rates remained low, but as with all things, the “party eventually ends.”

Once again, during the distribution phase of the market, the analysts, media, Wall Street, and rise of bloggers, all touted “this time was different.” There were “green shoots,” it was a “Goldilocks economy,” and there was “no recession in sight.” 

They were disastrously wrong.

If any of this sounds familiar, it should

The “Buy Everything” Market

So, here we are, a 15-years into one of the longest bull market cycles in history. Massive interventions by the Federal Reserve and the Government have created an era of “moral hazard” unlike anything in previous market history. Investors are scrambling to take on leverage, make the most speculative of investments, and chase whatever trend is currently in vogue regardless of economic or financial underpinnings. It’s a winner take all market, and investors are reveling in it under the belief that if anything goes wrong the “powers that be” will bail them out.

Once again, due to the length of the “mark up” phase, most investors today have once again forgotten the “ghosts of bear markets past.” Despite some bumps along the way, the same messages seen at previous market peaks are steadily hitting the headlines: “there is no recession in sight,” “the bull market is cheap” and “this time is different because of Central Banking.”

However, the risk to investors in the current “buy everything” market, is an “unexpected, exogenous event” that sparks a revaluation of expectations in an overly leveraged, overly extended, and overly bullish market. That the event will be is unknown, but when the markets begin the “distribution phase,” investors should become exceedingly cautious about the risks they are taking.

Lost And Found

There is a sizable contingent of investors, and advisors, today who have never been through a real bear market. After a 15-year long bull-market cycle, fueled by Central Bank liquidity, it is understandable why mainstream analysis believed the markets could only go higher. What was always a concern to us was the rather cavalier attitude they took about the risk.

“Sure, a correction will eventually come, but that is just part of the deal.”

What gets lost during bull cycles, and is always found in the most brutal of fashions, is the devastation caused to financial wealth during the inevitable decline. It isn’t just the loss of financial wealth, but also the loss of employment, defaults, and bankruptcies caused by the coincident recession. This is the story told by the S&P 500 inflation-adjusted total return index. The chart shows all of the measurement lines for all the previous bull and bear markets, along with the number of years required to get back to even.

What you should notice is that in many cases bear markets wiped out essentially all or a very substantial portion of the previous bull market advance.

But that is the inherent problem of “eternal bullishness” which is the “willful blindness” to the underlying data in an effort to chase short-term returns. This leads to the unfortunate problem of being “all-in” on every hand which has a devastating consequence when a mean reverting event occurs.

John Hussman once penned an excellent piece on the full-market cycle:

Put simply, most apparent “opportunities” to obtain investment returns above zero in conventional assets over the coming decade are based on a misunderstanding of valuations, total returns, and historical yield relationships. At current valuations, virtually everything is priced for a decade of zero. The unwinding of these speculative extremes is likely to be chaotic, and will likely occur over a shorter horizon than investors imagine. That chaos, driven not by central bank tightening but by an emerging default cycle, will usher in fresh investment opportunities in conventional assets, where presently there are none.

Looking beyond the near-term, my view is that a ‘permanently high plateau’ is unlikely, and we will instead see a violent unwinding of recent speculative extremes over the completion of the current market cycle, even if central banks ease aggressively, as they did throughout the 2000-2002 and 2007-2009 collapses. Corporate income growth and profit margins have already begun to narrow from their extremes, and the default cycle has already turned higher. The completion of this cycle won’t arrive because central banks suddenly become enlightened enough to abandon their recklessness. It will arrive precisely because they have sustained yield-seeking speculation for too long already; because they have amplified the vulnerability of the debt and equity markets to normal economic fluctuations; and because the consequences of this fragility are now fully baked in the cake.

In the end, it does not matter IF you are “bullish” or “bearish.” The reality is that both “bulls” and “bears” are owned by the “broken clock” syndrome during the full-market cycle. However, what is grossly important in achieving long-term investment success is not necessarily being “right” during the first half of the cycle, but by not being “wrong” during the second half.

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/18/2025 - 07:40

​​​​​​​Home Depot Slashes Outlook As Home-Renovation Demand Continues To Crumble

​​​​​​​Home Depot Slashes Outlook As Home-Renovation Demand Continues To Crumble

Home improvement retailer Home Depot slashed its full-year earnings outlook after another weak quarter, citing soft big-ticket spending, a paralyzed housing market, and lackluster seasonal demand. Adjusted EPS is now expected to fall 5%, worse than prior guidance. 

Third-quarter comparable sales rose just .2%, far below Bloomberg Consensus estimates of 1.36%. The retailer warned about weak consumer demand as elevated interest rates discourage home buying and remodeling. As a result, consumers are opting for smaller projects rather than upgrading their patios or building new decks. 

Snapshot of the third quarter with Bloomberg Consensus estimates:

Comparable sales: +0.2% (miss; est. +1.36%)

  • U.S. comps: +0.1% (miss; est. +1.25%)

Total net sales: $41.35 bn (+2.8% y/y) — modest beat (est. $40.97 bn)

  • Includes ~$900 m from recent GMS acquisition

Adjusted EPS: $3.74 (miss; est. $3.84; down from $3.78 y/y)

Average ticket: +1.8% (beat est. +1.1% implied)

Other notables:

  • Inventories higher than expected ($26.2 bn vs est. $25.0 bn)

  • SG&A expenses up 5.9% y/y, above estimates

Management commentary:

  • Miss driven mainly by the absence of storm/hurricane activity (hurt disaster-recovery categories) and failure of anticipated sequential demand improvement to appear

  • Ongoing headwinds: consumer uncertainty + continued pressure on the housing market, disproportionately hurting big-ticket home-improvement spending

Updated FY 2026 Guidance (previously issued in Aug 2025)

  • Sees sales about +3%, saw about +2.8%

  • Sees operating margin about 12.6%, saw about 13%, estimate 13.3%

  • Sees EPS decline about 6%, saw down about -3%

  • Sees adjusted EPS decline about 5%, saw down about 2%

Guidance reflects third-quarter underperformance and a continuation in the home improvement downturn, as we've pointed out in recent weeks:

Shares of Home Depot are slightly lower in premarket trading in New York, though nothing too notable. However, the long-term chart of the stock shows three clear rejections at the $400 level.

Goldman's top sector specialist Scott Feiler's first take on Home Depot earnings... 

Will We See Multiple Contraction?: HD stock is -2.5% on a 3% EPS cut.  A slight miss was expected here, but the magnitude of the miss and cut, while not huge, does feel slightly worse. It feels just weak enough to make investors really question how quickly to defend the name and slower to play for the 2026 recovery. While the stock being down makes sense, a price reaction more than the 3% cut will likely draw out some interest, given the stock is already -16% off September highs.

On Monday, Feiler told clients this would be a "very important week" for the consumer space. With Home Depot reporting weak demand for big-ticket items, here's what comes next (read the report).

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/18/2025 - 07:15

Poland Suspects Russia In "Unprecedented Act Of Sabotage" Of Rail Line

Poland Suspects Russia In "Unprecedented Act Of Sabotage" Of Rail Line

EU and NATO leaders are currently pointing the finger at Russia for what could be one of the single biggest acts of sabotage on European soil since the Ukraine war began.

A train track linking the Polish cities of Warsaw and Lublin was destroyed in an "unprecedented act of sabotage" on Sunday. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk declared that the now damaged railway is "crucially important for delivering aid to Ukraine.In invoking Ukraine aid, he's clearly letting suspicion fall on Moscow - though no arrests have been made in the early investigation. But photos suggest it's only a very small section of track left missing and subject to damage. And yet this could indeed be enough to derail a train.

via EPA/Daily Mail

An "explosive device" blew up the rail track, Tusk stated X. He followed by decrying that the act "directly (targeted) the security of the Polish state and its civilians." Apparently there was more damage even beyond this, with destruction located further down the line as well.

"Unfortunately, the worst suspicions were confirmed. An act of sabotage occurred on the Warsaw-Lublin line (in the village of Mika). An explosive device detonated and destroyed the railway track," Tusk said.

While not directly naming Russia, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen was quick to chime in, calling for greater European collective defense, also to 'protect the skies' amid alleged Russian-directed drone operations...

Estonia's Prime Minister Kristen Michal additionally condemned the apparent sabotage op, writing on X that he and his country stand with Poland. "Those behind hostile acts against (European Union) and NATO members must be exposed. Our response must be united," Michal said.

Estonia is one among several Balkan and Eastern European countries which have lately been alleging EU airspace is being widely sabotaged by Russian drones or at times military aircraft incursions.

United Media/Dyspozytura Trakcji via X: Damaged railway track with shattered concrete sleepers and a deformed steel rail section near Warsaw, Poland — suspected sabotage site under investigation.

As for the location of the alleged train track sabotage, Mika is located a little over 60 miles from Warsaw. It could indeed be part of an ongoing tit-for-tat sabotaging of both Russian and European infrastructure, in a long-running chain of mystery events.

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/18/2025 - 04:15

"You Can't Handle the Truth": UK Health Watchdog Reportedly Refuses To Release Data On Vaccine Deaths

"You Can't Handle the Truth": UK Health Watchdog Reportedly Refuses To Release Data On Vaccine Deaths

Authored by Jonathan Turley,

The United Kingdom’s public health service is reportedly refusing to release data on the potential relationship between the COVID vaccine and excess deaths.

The reason?

It would upset people to know the truth.

The question is whether British citizens have become so passive and yielding that they will support their government, keeping them from learning the facts about vaccines and allowing them to reach their own conclusions.

The UK has long embraced speech controls and censorship to protect citizens from unacceptable views or what one criminal defendant was told were “toxic ideologies.”

Social media companies assisted governments in censoring opposing scientific views during the pandemic, including those regarding the potential dangers of the vaccines.

Over the years, dissenting faculty members have been forced out of scientific and academic organizations for challenging preferred conclusions on subjects ranging from transgender transitions to COVID-19 protections to climate change. Some were barred from speaking at universities or blacklisted for their opposing views.

Many of the exiled experts were ultimately proven correct in challenging the efficacy of surgical masks or the need to shut down our schools and businesses. Scientists moved like a herd of lemmings on the origin of the virus, crushing those who suggested that the most likely explanation is a lab leak (a position that federal agencies would later embrace).

Scientists have worked with the government in suppressing dissenting views. For example, The Wall Street Journal released a report on how the Biden administration suppressed dissenting views supporting the lab leak theory, as dissenting scientists were blacklisted and targeted.

When experts within the Biden Administration found that the lab theory was the most likely explanation for COVID-19, they were told not to share their data publicly and were warned about being “off the reservation.”

Universities and associations joined the crackdown. Scientists questioning the efficacy of those blue surgical masks and the six-foot rule were suppressed. So were those arguing that we should, as in Europe, keep schools open. These experts were also later vindicated, but few were rehired or reestablished in universities or associations.

It was all done in the name of protecting the public from opposing views or data.

The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) shows that little has changed. 

According to the Telegraph, the agency declared that releasing the data would lead to the “distress or anger” of bereaved relatives if a link were to be discovered.

It also suggested that the data might stress or undermine the mental health of the families and friends of people who died.

The story has received little attention in the media, which previously joined efforts to suppress opposing views during the pandemic.

We have no idea what the data actually says, but there should be uniform agreement that the public has a right to know.

The controversy is reminiscent of the position of the British courts on sharing information with patients. In the United States, there is a strong common law in favor of disclosing to patients any risks or complications associated with possible treatments or surgeries. In the UK, the courts took a more deferential view of doctors. As with the agency’s position, the rationale was hard for many in the United States to comprehend, let alone accept.

For example, in Sidaway v. Bethlem Royal Hospital (1985), the court rejected the need for a surgeon to inform a patient of a low risk of nerve damage from a laminectomy, writing:

“I confess that I reach this conclusion with no regret. The evidence in this case showed that a contrary result would be damaging to the relationship of trust and confidence between doctor and patient, and might well have an adverse effect on the practice of medicine.  It is doubtful whether it would be of any significant benefit to patients, most of whom prefer to put themselves unreservedly in the hands of their doctors.”

The decision to withhold the data on vaccines shows the same arrogant assumptions.

If I had a loved one who died from the vaccine, I would like to know about it.

The government is essentially arguing a Jessup rule that “you can’t handle the truth.”

We will now see if the British people have lost all self-respect and separation from their government in yielding to this decision.

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/18/2025 - 03:30

Climate Scientists Claim That Global Warming Is Going To Cause A New Ice Age?

Climate Scientists Claim That Global Warming Is Going To Cause A New Ice Age?

In the past, climate change has been consistently ranked as a "top concern" for people all over the world. However, that priority has shifted in recent years according to a revealing study published in October by global research firm Ipsos.   

The change has been dramatic. In 2025, public concern over climate change has fallen sharply behind concerns of war and economic instability, with geopolitical turmoil and the cost of living crisis.  Ipsos' 2025 Global Consumer Awareness Survey, which was published in collaboration with the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), covers 50 countries and surveyed more than 40,000 respondents.  It found that war and the economy now dominate public worries at 52%, while climate change trails at just 31%.

Climate scientists say this drop in public concern over global warming is disturbing.  They claim 2024 was the "hottest year on record" (which is a lie), and that the populace should be more worried, not less.

The public is, of course, more concerned about the immediate dangers to their standard of living and such threats have easily supplanted climate change:  A threat which we have been browbeaten with over the course of decades even though it never seems to materialize.  

However, education on the facts surrounding climate change has also given the public perspective and people are beginning to realize that climate science might just be one of the biggest scams of the 21st Century.  In other words, the indoctrination is failing and less and less people are buying into the hysteria.

Climate science is an industry that us built like a labyrinthine bureaucracy.  Various governments worldwide spend around $10 billion annually on direct funding for climate research.  The scam is lucrative, and so the scam must continue.  But what happens when climate predictions turn out consistently false and the public gets wise?

Time to switch gears and fabricate new fears... 

Popular Mechanics is on the case (yet again), promoting a new climate science theory that global warming is going to get so bad it will trigger a new ice age.  Yes, it's the complete opposite of what global warming theorists have been positing for years, but let's ignore that fact for a moment.

A new study suggests that biological and oceanic process—supercharged by anthropogenic climate change—could eventually lead the Earth to overcorrect and send the planet into a deep freeze. 

Popular Mechanic's claims:

"Today, the Earth is experiencing a warming period unlike any other. The Jurassic, which was warm due to high levels of atmospheric carbon, reached its sweltering temperatures gradually, whereas anthropogenic climate change has caused much more rapid shifts - so rapid, in fact, that certain climactic changes have been discernible even within the average human lifespan..."

None of this is true.  They continue:

"Typically, one way the Earth regulates its temperature is through the slow weathering of silicate rocks—a process sometimes referred to as Earth’s “natural thermostat.” But a new study, led by scientists at the University of Bremen in German and the University of California (UC) Riverside, shows that a combination of biological and oceanic feedback loops (particularly those involving algae, phosphorus, and oxygen) could outpace this long-standing moderation strategy. This would paradoxically lead Earth to a premature deep freeze hundreds of thousands of years in the future..."

So, even if this theory was accurate, we've got plenty of time to figure it out.  If you are familiar with the history of climate change propaganda dating back to the 1970's, then this idea might sound very familiar to you.  Some of the first claims of impending climate doom were not about global warming, they were about global cooling.  This was back when the narrative was not solidified and consensus had not yet been paid for.

In reality, today's "warming period" is actually one of the coldest periods in the history of the Earth.  When climate scientists say that a particular year was the "hottest on record", what they omit is the length of the record they are referring to.  Climate scientists base all of their claims of global warming on a 140 year record going back to the 1880s.  This is a tiny sliver of time in the Earth's overall climate history.  If you look at a record going back millions of years, you will find that our planet has had warming cycles far hotter than today.

Not only do they consistently lie about comparative temperatures and the climate record, they also lie about carbon emissions being the cause of warming trends.  A graph of atmospheric carbon content over the same time frame shows no correlation or causation between carbon and warming.

One thing that is true is that global cooling would be more dangerous to the Earth than global warming.  The most recent Ice Age was a devastating event that is projected to have killed up to 150,000 non-microbe species.  On a grand scale of Earth-time, we have barely exited that disaster which ended 11,000 years ago.

In all likelihood the climate change industry is rushing to find a new narrative as the populace drifts away from global warming fear.  Carbon taxation, population control, centralized government dominance of energy and industry all rely on people blindly accepting man-made climate change as real. Global cooling might make a comeback as the premier bogeyman of the future if global warming doesn't stick.  

Tyler Durden Tue, 11/18/2025 - 02:45

If Demographics Are Destiny... We're Screwed!

If Demographics Are Destiny... We're Screwed!

Authored by Jim Quinn via The Burning Platform blog,

Demographics don’t lie. The governments of the world and their captured bureaucrats can manipulate inflation data, unemployment data, GDP data, and numerous other data based figures to make things appear better than they are. It’s called propaganda and manipulation to create a false narrative beneficial to their interests. But, demographic data can’t be massaged to provide a happy ending for the psychopaths in suits, running the show.

They can ignore the data and pretend it doesn’t exist, but you can’t change the ages of the people inhabiting this planet.

The data is dire for the Western world and Asia, particularly China, Taiwan, South Korea, and Singapore.

The U.S. fertility rate is at an all-time low, down 55% from its peak in 1957. It is down 40% since the early 1970s, when women, brainwashed by feminist tripe, joined the workforce in droves, and murdered 63 million of their unborn children, in the name of women’s rights.

This is what the woman’s movement, created by the globalist cabal to advance their agenda of destroying the western world and replacing it with their one world order, has wrought.

Their plan has been to replace the educated white people in western countries with low IQ 3rd world parasites, as a means to their end of controlling the masses in a digital prison of their making. Feminism was designed to convince women to stop having children, stop marrying strong men, and believing their lives were more fulfilled working 60 hours a week rather than raising children. The cultural destruction of America is almost complete.

Our globalist overlords have succeeded spectacularly in destroying the social fabric and community mores of our nation and other “developed” countries. And, as designed, the gene altering Pfizer/Moderna jabs are causing global fertility rates to plummet further, exacerbating the already dire trend. I wonder why very few 3rd worlders received the toxic covid jabs. Maybe the globalist controllers wanted to keep their fertility rates high.

The charts and maps below paint a bleak picture for the citizens of the world, but an absolute windfall for the totalitarians seeking to imprison us in their social credit, CBDC techno-gulag world of the future. The illiterate, mud hut dwellers are pumping out more illiterate 3rd worlders at a rate five to six times as high as the rich developed world countries. With a required replacement rate of 2.1, in order to maintain a static population, the U.S. and most of the countries in the developed world are in a self imposed death spiral. With 6,000 Boomers dying per day, the U.S. spiral is accelerating.

Via Visual Capitalist

The world’s fertility rate continues its steady decline, averaging 2.25 children per woman, a 6.2% drop from 2019. The map reveals a striking global divide: countries in sub-Saharan Africa still record some of the world’s highest birth rates, with Chad leading at 6.03, while nations in East Asia and Europe see record lows, led by South Korea at just 0.73.

Despite this overall slowdown, some countries have bucked the trend. UzbekistanBulgaria, and Armenia saw notable increases, while NigerUganda, and Kuwait experienced the sharpest declines.

These shifts reflect the complex mix of economic, cultural, and policy factors influencing family planning worldwide.

As more countries fall below the population replacement rate of 2.1, the implications for labor forces, ageing populations, and future economic growth are becoming increasingly clear; signaling that the world’s demographic balance is rapidly changing.

The elimination of high IQ, highly productive whites and Asians, and replacing them with low IQ parasitical african and muslim dregs, guarantees the degradation of our society, culture, and financial viability. The open borders and purposeful importation of the riffraff, scum and rabble from Africa and Middle East is part of the Great Reset agenda. The social welfare costs of maintaining these lazy good for nothings will bankrupt the developed world, causing a global financial Armageddon. This will lead to the masses begging their overlords for CBDCs, a living stipend, tiny government issued hovels, and technological monitoring of all their communications.

You will come to love your servitude in this brave new world.

“Most human beings have an almost infinite capacity for taking things for granted.”

- Aldous Huxley, Brave New World

We took the world we had for granted. Now we will pay the price.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of ZeroHedge.

Tyler Durden Mon, 11/17/2025 - 22:35

Pages