Individual Economists

Judge's Acceptance Of Donation From Michigan Secretary Of State Spurs Call For Ethics Probe

Zero Hedge -

Judge's Acceptance Of Donation From Michigan Secretary Of State Spurs Call For Ethics Probe

Authored by Steven Kovac via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Updated: 10/15/2024

Two Republican election integrity activists on Oct. 1 requested an investigation into a campaign donation received by a Michigan State Supreme Court justice from a PAC tied to Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson.

The Hall of Justice building in downtown Lansing, Mich., on Aug. 17, 2018. The building is home to the Michigan Supreme Court. Shutterstock

Braden Giacobazzi and former state Sen. Patrick Colbeck sent a formal request on Oct. 1 to the Judicial Tenure Commission, a panel that oversees the conduct of judges, asking it to look into Supreme Court Justice Kyra Harris Bolden regarding the propriety of an $82,500 donation received by her campaign.

According to Bolden’s campaign committee, the donation was received on May 17, 2024, from the Michigan Legacy PAC, which was founded by Benson. The PAC’s finance reports show that $82,500 was donated on April 26, 2024, to the Keep Kyra Harris Bolden for Justice committee.

The activists said the donation should be investigated because Bolden accepted it when the seven-member Supreme Court was deciding an appeal filed by Benson in November 2023, which was granted by the court with a 5–2 majority in August 2024.

The ruling overturned a decision by the Michigan Court of Claims, and a subsequent 3–0 Michigan Court of Appeals ruling upholding the lower court’s decision, that Benson’s guidance regarding poll challengers violated state law and, therefore, had to be modified.

The activists said the decision will eliminate effective oversight of the conduct of elections by poll challengers.

Bolden’s office referred inquiries to the spokesman for the Michigan Supreme Court, John Niven, who declined to comment.

Bolden, a Democrat, is a former state representative and criminal defense attorney from the Detroit area. She ran unsuccessfully for a seat on the Michigan Supreme Court in November 2022.

Weeks after that election, she was appointed by Gov. Gretchen Whitmer to serve for a portion of the unexpired term of retiring Justice Bridget McCormack.

Bolden is running in the upcoming Nov. 5 election to retain her position until Jan. 1, 2029.

On Oct. 11, Colbeck also submitted a request for an investigation of Benson, who is a lawyer, to the State of Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission, a group that oversees the ethics of lawyers.

In his request for investigation, Colbeck alleged Benson’s campaign donation to a Michigan Supreme Court Justice at a time when the court had a lawsuit with Benson as a defendant before it “constitutes a serious ethics violation and misconduct as a member of the Michigan Bar Association.”

Benson did not respond to a request for comment by publication time. The Michigan Legacy PAC could not be reached by phone or email.

Tyler Durden Tue, 10/15/2024 - 15:20

Stagflation Odds Jump In Latest NY Fed Survey As Inflation Expectations Rise, Delinquency Fears Hit 4 Year High

Zero Hedge -

Stagflation Odds Jump In Latest NY Fed Survey As Inflation Expectations Rise, Delinquency Fears Hit 4 Year High

In recent weeks, we have discussed on multiple occasions (here, here and here) how in his desire to get Kamala Harris re-elected by rushing out a jumbo cut before November 5, Fed president Jerome Powell may have triggered the second coming of the Arthur Burns "galloping inflation" Fed, and sure enough recent inflationary prints have certainly raised the threat that the Fed is now aggressively easing even as inflation has not only not been defeated, but is once again rising.

Then overnight, it was Deutsche Bank's chief credit strategist Jim Reid who observed that US 5yr inflation swaps have seen their "largest 5-week climb since just before SVB's collapse in March 2023, an event that shifted the narrative away from around 4 more hikes to imminent cuts for a period of time."

To be fair, it's not just the 50bps Fed easing in itself that has changed the inflation and rates outlook over the last few weeks. We’ve also seen 1) expectations that the ECB will move more aggressively; 2) renewed geopolitical risk and a potentially large China stimulus turn the Oil price (and other commodities) higher after a late summer slump; 3) a bumper payrolls report; and 4) still generally firm US data, including an upside surprise in the CPI last week.

Then again, these are all dynamics that the Fed should have considered before it launched an aggressive easing cycle at a time when stock prices are at all time highs, when wage inflation ~5%...

... and when home prices are still rising at a mindblowing 6%!

It is therefore not surprising that the latest monthly survey of consumer expectations from the NY Fed found that inflation expectations rose at both the three-year horizon (from 2.5% to 2.7%) and the five-year horizon (from 2.8% to 2.9%), and remained unchanged at the one-year horizon (where they are driven primarily by recent moves in gas prices).

And the reason why the short-term inflation expectations were unchanged - if at the Fed's raised inflation target of 3% - is because the median respondent saw gasoline up "only" 3.4% over the next 12 months, the least in two years. Expected food inflation ticked higher after falling in August to the lowest level since pre-pandemic, while expectations for rental inflation moderated to 6.3%. Median home price growth expectations decreased by 0.1 percentage point to 3.0%. Some other year-ahead commodity price expectations: an increase of 0.1% for food to 4.5%, college prices remained unchanged at 5.9%; medical care cost expectations dropped by 1.4% to 6.6% (the lowest reading since February 2020).

And while inflation expectations rose, sentiment about the broader economy deteriorated as perceptions among households that they might become delinquent on debts increased last month to the highest levels since April 2020.  The anticipated probability of missing a minimum debt payment over the next three months rose to 14.2% in September, marking the fourth straight month of increases; the increase was most pronounced for respondents between ages 40 and 60 and those with annual household incomes above $100k.

The latest data confirms the view that the US economy is becoming increasingly split as some households do well while others are getting crushed by rising prices, slower growth and higher unemployment. In other words, stagflation. 

While the orchestrated surge in the stock market - and one has the Fed's recent rate cut to thank for that - has helped propel overall household net worth to a record over the past few months, tens of millions of Americans do not own any equities and have instead been accumulating debt in recent years amid elevated interest rates.

The increased odds of delinquency were mirrored in a broader deterioration of perceptions about households’ current financial situations, with fewer consumers reporting being better off and more reporting being worse off than a year ago, according to the survey.

Sticking with the stagflation theme, year-ahead household income and spending growth expectations declined by 0.1 percentage point to 3.0 percent and 4.9 percent, respectively.

There was slightly more cheer in consumers' labor market expectations, where the probability of leaving one’s job voluntarily in the next twelve months increased to 20.4% from 19.1%, and the mean perceived probability of finding a job in the event of job loss increased to 52.7% from 52.3% in August.

Hilariously, median year-ahead expected growth in government debt declined by 1.1 percentage points to 8.0%, reaching the measure’s lowest level since February 2020. Spoiler alert: it will be much, much higher.

And confirming that many of the respondents are absolutely clueless, the mean perceived probability that the average interest rate on saving accounts will be higher 12 months from now decreased by 1.5 percentage points to 25.1%. Yes, about 25% of households have no idea that the Fed is now cutting rates and rates on savings accounts will be much lower in 12 months... unless of course we get hyperinflation in the next 3-9 months and the Fed panics into a hiking frenzy

Last but not least, the mean perceived probability that U.S. stock prices will be higher 12 months from now increased by 1.0 percentage point to 40.3%. It was unclear how many bulls also expected lower rates in the coming year.

Overall, an ugly, stagflationary survey, and hardly what the Fed may have expected to see several weeks into the first easing cycle since the global economy was shut down by a genetically engineered flu virus in 2020.

Tyler Durden Tue, 10/15/2024 - 15:00

Rickards: This Is What Will Destroy The Dollar

Zero Hedge -

Rickards: This Is What Will Destroy The Dollar

Authored by James Rickards via DailyReckoning.com,

Janet Yellen gave a speech on Sept. 26 at the 2024 U.S. Treasury Market Conference in New York. The speech was largely about risks in the banking system and the market for U.S. Treasury debt.

In a pre-speech interview with Politico, Yellen was asked about risks related to a smooth presidential transition in this election cycle. While that may seem like a straightforward question, it contained a particular bias that somehow Donald Trump, win or lose, might make the presidential transition difficult.

Difficulties could arise if Trump loses and claims the election was “rigged” or if Trump wins and radical groups like antifa commence violent protests. My estimate is that the former is unlikely, and the latter is far more likely but Trump haters in the media will take the opposite view.

Yellen replied, “It really is essential to our having a democratic system and a democratic government, and one of the tremendous strengths of our financial system is that it is based on strong institutions and the rule of law.”

While this statement may seem reasonable on its face, it was Yellen’s thinly disguised way of saying that Donald Trump’s actions on Jan. 6, 2021, and possible similar acts on Jan. 6, 2025, are a threat to the “rule of law” and therefore a danger to the stability of the financial system.

There are many forces at work in this statement by Yellen. In the first instance, this is an example of the Biden-Harris administration “all of government” approach.

What this means is that when the White House has a top priority (open borders, climate change, defeat Trump), every department and agency is expected to advance that goal even if the role of that agency has nothing to do with the issue at hand.

The White House says, in effect, “Find a way.”

So here is Yellen dragging the Treasury Department into the effort to discredit Trump by suggesting he is a threat to the financial system and the Treasury market. This political twist has almost nothing to do with the Treasury’s role in the executive branch except at a stretch.

The irony is that Yellen herself is the greatest threat to the Treasury market through her persistent and illegal efforts to steal $300 billion in U.S. Treasury securities owned by the Central Bank of Russia and held in custody in U.S. and European banks and the Euroclear clearinghouse in Brussels.

That particular threat to steal the Russian securities to be used as backing for a loan to Ukraine has accelerated efforts of the BRICS and the Global South to move toward a new currency linked to gold that would initially compete with the dollar in global payments and eventually rival the dollar as a major global reserve currency.

Those efforts will see major advances made at the BRICS leaders’ summit in Kazan, Russian Federation on Oct. 22–24 hosted by President Putin. The BRICS summit will announce new members. That’s important because expanding the membership is the key predicate to launching a viable payment currency.

Will a new BRICS currency instantly displace the dollar in its role as leading reserve currency? How much of a threat would it be? Read on...

BRICS Currency Won’t Displace Dollar Overnight

The original BRICs membership from 2009 consisted of Brazil, Russia, India and China. South Africa was added in 2010 when the group’s name was changed to BRICS. That group expanded significantly at the 2023 Leaders’ Summit in South Africa when Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) were added.

(Argentina and Saudi Arabia were also permitted to enter but Argentina withdrew its application, and Saudi Arabia deferred its membership saying it was still considering the matter.)

The BRICS has been active over the years in institutionalizing its initiatives.

In 2014, the BRICS created the New Development Bank (NDB), which functions along the lines of the World Bank to promote infrastructure development in emerging economies. The NDB was capitalized with over $100 billion from its members and currently has 53 projects underway with commitments of over $15 billion to those projects.

In 2015, the BRICS established the Contingent Reserve Arrangement (CRA), which acts as a swing lender to members experiencing temporary balance of payments difficulties. In this regard, the CRA functions somewhat like the International Monetary Fund. Between the NDB and the CRA, it is clear that BRICS are intentionally constructing their own version of the Bretton Woods institutions but with their own controls and membership.

Beyond the nine current members, there’s a waiting list of over 20 aspiring members including economic powers such as Nigeria, Venezuela, Indonesia, Malaysia, Turkey, Thailand and Vietnam. Current members Russia, UAE and Iran make BRICS an oil output heavyweight.

Russia, China and South Africa are among the world’s largest gold producers. India and China alone have a combined population of 2.8 billion or 35% of the entire population of the globe.

The BRICS are part of an emerging Global South that is challenging the Collective West for world economic and geopolitical dominance.

The subject of a BRICS currency is confusing to most observers and is a fraught topic even for many experts. We’ll call the potential currency a BRIC for convenience although no formal name has been announced.

The starting point is to distinguish between a payment currency and a reserve currency. A payment currency is used to settle purchases and sales of tradable goods and services. A reserve currency is the denomination of the currency in which national savings are invested, typically in U.S. Treasury securities or gold.

Some currencies perform both functions as reserve and payment currencies especially U.S. dollars and euros. A finance minister or central banker can move from one to the other; currencies earned can be invested as reserves or reserves can be sold to finance purchases.

Still, it’s important to bear the distinction in mind when evaluating the use case for each currency, especially BRICs. Put differently, a flaw or deficiency in one usage does not preclude the other.

The BRICS currency is very far along in establishing itself as a viable payment currency. The prerequisites are: agreed-upon value (which can be fixed to another currency, floating or pegged to a weight of gold), secure payments channels (basically high-speed, encrypted digital pipes for authenticated message traffic), digital ledgers and an agreed issuer (the NDB based in Shanghai may be suitable for this purpose but another institution could be created).

The single most important element is a sufficiently large membership in the BRICS currency union such that a recipient of BRICS payments can use them for purchases in many jurisdictions for many goods and services.

This last point is where most alternative currency payments arrangements fall down. Russia can sell oil to China for yuan (which they are currently doing) but they are constrained in terms of where they can spend the yuan (basically limited to Chinese manufactured goods and semiconductors). The same issue arises when Russia sells oil to India (for rupees) or weapons to Iran (for rials). The seller is limited in terms of what they can buy with the trading partner’s currency.

This constraint goes away in a currency union with 15 or 20 members or more. If Russia earns BRICs from China, they can buy Embraer aircraft from Brazil or semiconductors from Malaysia. For that matter, use of a payment currency in a multimember currency union is not limited to members.

With access to the payment channels, non-members can nevertheless agree to receive the BRICS currency in payment confident in their ability to spend it among the other BRICS members who are trading partners. The proof of this is the eurozone, which is currently a 20-member currency union with a single central bank and worldwide acceptance of the euro.

Moving from a payment currency to a reserve currency is more difficult. The prerequisite here is a large, liquid bond market. That bond market has to be surrounded by extensive transactional and legal infrastructure including: securities at all maturities (30 days to 30 years), an underwriting system (primary dealers in the U.S.), an auction system for sales of new issues, a repo market to finance inventories, futures, options, other derivatives (swaps), settlement channels, custodians (DTCC, others), etc.

Above all, holders need a good rule of law regime on which to rely in the case of disputes or defaults. All of these elements exist in the reserve currency bond market nonpareil — the U.S. Treasury securities market. None of it exists in the form of a putative BRICS bond market. It would likely take 10 years or longer to create reserve currency infrastructure with the biggest single impediment being the rule of law.

That said, there are several interesting developments taking place.

The first is that the U.S. is squandering its rule of law advantage with sanctions on Russia, the freezing of the assets of the Central Bank of Russia and efforts to actually steal those assets and convert them into a $50 billion loan to Ukraine using structured finance.

Given this rogue behavior by the U.S., countries are becoming more cautious about large U.S. Treasury note reserves. This may account in part for the recent rally in the price of gold.

The second is the upcoming BRICS summit in Kazan.

Russia will announce significant progress in building out secure payments channels and will admit new members, which will drive the group closer to the critical mass needed to launch a currency union.

Finally, the impact of Yellen’s efforts to steal U.S. Treasury securities from Russia goes beyond the BRICS meeting and the rise of a new payment currency. Yellen’s blatant theft from the Central Bank of Russia is a driving force behind the price of gold reaching new all-time highs recently.

Central banks have been net buyers of gold since 2010, but the tempo of gold buying has increased as the U.S. rule of law under policymakers like Yellen begins to crumble.

Gold is a physical non-digital asset that cannot be stolen, frozen or seized provided it is in safe storage. Until the BRICS currency is ready, gold will be the asset of choice for foreign reserve managers faced with a rogue Treasury Secretary.

What began as a political hack (to beat Trump) has turned into another driver in the downfall of the dollar and the U.S. Treasury market. This is one more example of short-term, self-defeating thinking by the White House and the U.S. Treasury.

Tyler Durden Tue, 10/15/2024 - 14:40

Cold Blob Invades Central & Eastern US As Proper Autumn Arrives For Millions 

Zero Hedge -

Cold Blob Invades Central & Eastern US As Proper Autumn Arrives For Millions 

A cold front swept across the north-central US through the eastern half of the US late weekend into the early part of the new week. For readers based in the east and central US, Brrr! It's a chilly morning as fall-like weather roars in, and it could get even chillier into Wednesday. 

"Below average temperatures forecast across the central and eastern United States, while summer-like warmth remains over portions of Texas today and the northern Plain by Wednesday," NWS' Weather Prediction Center wrote on X. 

X user MyRadar Weather shows the cold blob of Canadian air descending into parts of the central and eastern US.

As of Tuesday morning, tens of millions of people from the Plains to the Appalachians and Northeast were under frost or other winter alerts as temperatures were below freezing in many parts. 

Snow showers have been reported in the mountains of Western Virginia, with accumulation already taking place at the Canaan Valley ski resort.

Accumulating snow was reported in the Northeast. 

Wednesday will also be the chilliest day of the week. 

More broadly, across the Lower 48, global warming seems to have disappeared after MSM reporters warned this summer the Earth was doomed - yet - here we are now - and it's chilly out. Temperatures in the US are tracking a 30-year seasonal trend lower.

This latest cold front has ushered in a proper autumn chill for tens of millions. It's about the time for households who can build those firewood stockpiles to do so ahead of what could be a cold and snowy winter. Terrible 'green' energy climate policies have sent power bills through the roof - one way to offset this is to burn cheap wood or coal.

Tyler Durden Tue, 10/15/2024 - 14:20

Walgreens Jumps Most In Years After Better-Than-Expected Earnings, Outlook, & Widespread Store Closures

Zero Hedge -

Walgreens Jumps Most In Years After Better-Than-Expected Earnings, Outlook, & Widespread Store Closures

Walgreens shares in New York surged the most in 16 years on Tuesday after the struggling pharmacy chain delivered an unexpectedly optimistic forecast for 2025. Simultaneously, Walgreens announced plans to shutter over a thousand stores nationwide as its turnaround plan gains steam. 

Fourth-quarter earnings were 39 cents, beating the Bloomberg consensus of 36 cents. This indicates that the struggling drugstore chain is executing on its aggressive cost-cutting measures in an ambitious turnaround plan after years of pain.

Here's a snapshot of the quarterly results (courtesy of Bloomberg):

  • Adjusted EPS 39c vs. 67c y/y, estimate 36c
  • International sales $5.97 billion, +3.2% y/y, estimate $5.84 billion
  • Sales $37.55 billion, +6% y/y, estimate $35.56 billion
  • Adjusted gross margin 16.9% vs. 18.6% y/y, estimate 17.6%
  • US Retail Pharmacy Sales $29.47 billion, +6.5% y/y, estimate $27.48 billion
  • US Healthcare Sales $2.11 billion, +7.2% y/y, estimate $2.15 billion
  • Adjusted gross profit $6.33 billion, -4% y/y, estimate $6.24 billion
  • Adjusted operating income $424 million, -38% y/y, estimate $396 million

With the fourth quarter print not so bad, Walgreens issued profit guidance for 2025 that was in line with the average analysts tracked by Bloomberg:  

  • Sees adjusted EPS $1.40 to $1.80, estimate $1.73 (Bloomberg Consensus)
  • Sees sales $147 billion to $151 billion, estimate $146.9 billion
  • Sees adjusted operating income $1.6 billion to $2.0 billion, estimate $1.89 billion

CEO Tim Wentworth wrote that the "turnaround will take time, but we are confident it will yield significant financial and consumer benefits over the long term."

Walgreens also announced that 14% of its US stores, or around 1,200 locations, will close over the next three years. About 500 of those stores will close in 2025.

In June, the drugstore chain announced that 300 underperforming locations would close as part of the turnaround plan. It also noted about a quarter of all stores were unprofitable and would usher in "imminent" changes.

Here's analyst commentary about Walgreens's ER and turnaround plan:

Leerink Partners, Michael Cherny (market perform, PT $9)

  • Says WBA's FY25 guidance "needs more details from the upcoming deck on the full breakdown from revenue guidance to EPS guidance"
  • The updated commentary on the store closure plan is a start, although further visibility into the makeup of the closures is going to be another focus
  • "All-in, the FY4Q'24 print and FY25 guidance was not as bad as it could have been, which is somewhat of a positive relative to recent trends"

Evercore ISI, Elizabeth Anderson (in line, PT $7.50)

  • Says WBA finished its FY24 on a relative high note, with strong pharmacy comp sales
  • "US Healthcare adj op margin was also positive (first time!) as the company continued to make progress on both GMs and OpEx"

Barclays, Stephanie Davis (underweight, PT $7)

  • Calls the 2025 guidance "better than feared"

Jonathan Palmer, an analyst with Bloomberg Intelligence

  • "The decisive decision to shutter a large cohort of underperforming stores is a positive in a narrative where the expectations are exceedingly low." 

WBA shares jumped as much as 15% in markets—the most in 16 years. Shares peaked at the $96 handle in August 2015 and have since tumbled 91%. The latest downward pressure comes from budget-conscious consumers. 

We wonder how many of the Walgreens stores slated to close next are in lawless progressive cities. 

Sigh.  

Tyler Durden Tue, 10/15/2024 - 13:40

Harris-Walz: "The Most Anti-Free-Speech Ticket In Centuries"

Zero Hedge -

Harris-Walz: "The Most Anti-Free-Speech Ticket In Centuries"

Authored by Jonathan Turley,

Roughly five centuries ago, a new dance first reported in Augsburg, Germany was promptly dubbed the “waltz” after the German term for “to roll or revolve.”

Today, there is no more nimble performer of that dizzying dance than Democratic vice presidential nominee Tim Walz.

Indeed, “Walzing” has become the Minnesota governor’s signature political two-step after his controversial statements on his allegedly socialist viewseliminating the electoral college and other topics.

On Sunday, Walz’s dance partner was Fox News host Shannon Bream, who seemed to be fighting vertigo as the candidate tried to deflect his shocking prior statements on free speech.

Bream asked Walz about his prior declaration that there is “no guarantee to free speech on misinformation or hate speech”— a statement that runs counter to decades of Supreme Court decisions.

Walz notably did not deny or retract his statement. Instead, his interview ironically became itself a flagrant example of misinformation.

First of all, misinformation and hate speech are not exceptions to the First Amendment: Whether it is the cross burnings of infamous figures like KKK leader Clarence Brandenburg or the Nazis who marched in Skokie, Ill., hate speech is protected.

Yet both Harris and Walz are true believers in the righteousness of censorship for disinformation, misinformation and malinformation.

The Biden administration defines misinformation as “false, but not created or shared with the intention of causing harm” — meaning it would subject you to censorship even if you are not intending harm.

It defines malinformation as “based on fact, but used out of context to mislead, harm, or manipulate.”

So you can post “true facts,” but would still be subject to censorship if you are viewed as misleading others with your pesky truth-telling.

Furthermore, “book bans” are not equivalent to the Harris-Walz censorship policies.

After years of supporting censorship and blacklisting, Democrats are attempting to deflect questions by claiming that the GOP is the greater threat.

“We’re seeing censorship coming in the form of book bannings in different places,” Walz told Bream.

“We’re seeing attempts in schools.”

First, a reality check: The Biden-Harris administration has helped fund and actively support the largest censorship system in our history, a system described by one federal court as “Orwellian.”

These are actual and unrelenting efforts to target individuals and groups for opposing views on subjects ranging from gender identity to climate change to COVID to election fraud.

While Walz and others rarely specifically reference the book bans in question, Florida is one state whose laws concern age limits on access to graphic or sexual material in schools.

School districts have always been given wide latitude in making such decisions on curriculum or library policies. Indeed, while rarely mentioned by the media, the left has demanded the banning or alteration of a number of classic books, including “To Kill a Mockingbird” and “Of Mice and Men,” under diversity or equity rationales.

I have long opposed actual book bans perpetrated by both the left and the right. However, school districts have always made such access and curriculum decisions.

Finally, Walz and others often sell censorship by citing the dangers of child pornography or of threats made against individuals.

Walz on Sunday followed Hillary Clinton’s recent pro-censorship campaign as he employed such misdirection.

“The issue on this was the hate speech and the protected hate speech — speech that’s aimed at creating violence, speech that’s aimed at threats to individuals,” he claimed.

“That’s what we’re talking about in this.”

First, he’d said there is no protected hate speech.

Second, the law already provides ample protections against threats toward individuals.

What’s most striking is that, after years of unapologetically embracing censorship (often under the Orwellian term “content moderation”), the left does not seem to want to discuss it in this election.

Democrats in Congress opposed every major effort to investigate the role of the Biden administration in the social-media censorship system it constructed. Many denied any such connection.

Elon Musk ended much of that debate with the release of the Twitter Files showing thousands of emails from the administration targeting individuals and groups with opposing views.

Now the public is being asked to vote for the most anti-free speech ticket in centuries — but neither Harris nor Walz want to talk about it in any detail.

The result may be the largest bait-and-switch in history.

Walz, Clinton and others also falsely claim they are simply trying to stop things like child pornography — which is already covered by existing criminal laws.

But what many on the left want is to regain what Clinton called their loss of “control” over what we are allowed to say or hear on social media.

Make no mistake about it: The “Walzing” of free speech is one dance you would be wise to decline.

Otherwise, do not be surprised if, when the music stops, you find yourself without both your partner and your free speech.

*  *  *

Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University and the author of “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage.”

Tyler Durden Tue, 10/15/2024 - 13:20

Of 435 House Seats Only 11 Are Rated Tossup

Zero Hedge -

Of 435 House Seats Only 11 Are Rated Tossup

Authored by Mike Shedlock via MishTalk.com,

The outcome in a mere 11 seats may determine which party wins the House of Representatives.

The odds of a clean sweep by either party in the Senate, House, and White House are not that great.

Democrats are highly likely to lose the Senate, and close analysis of RaceToTheWH stats suggests Republicans will struggle to win the House.

Ratings
  • Safe D or R: Favorite has a 95%+ Chance.

  • Lean D or R: Favorite has a 76-85% Chance.

  • Tossup: Favorite has < 65% Chance.

I disagree with those weightings. And I strongly suspect the reason is to be able to count the ratings they got right without error.

Tilts are 65+ percent calls, hardly going out on a limb.

House Map Analysis

If all of the lean, likely, and tilt races go according to current odds (they won’t), then Republicans would need a sweep of the 11 races rated tossup.

If instead we assume the all of the safe + lean races break as suggested, we can discuss what it would take for Republicans to win the House.

One small advantage Republicans have is in the Tilts. Republicans only have 3 tilts but Democrats have 7.

Of the 21 tossups or tilts (counting Republican tilts), Republicans need to win 17 of those races or pull off major upsets elsewhere.

If we redefine tossup as 55 percent or less, there are only four genuinely competitive races out of 435. Sheeesh!

Eleven Tossups
  • ME-2: D 53.1%

  • NY-19: D 51.9%

  • NY-17: D 52.0%

  • MI-7: R 53.9%

  • IA-1: R 58.6%

  • CO-3: R 61.7%

  • AZ-1: R 64.4%

  • CA-41: R 58.8%

  • CA-22: D 61.6%

  • OR-5: D 56.1%

  • WA-3: D 57.1%

Of those, I would only rate the first four as genuine tossups.

Polymarket has the Democrat’s odds of winning the House at 56 percent. If the RaceToTheWH odds are accurate, that’s on the high side unless polls are overcounting Democrats nationally.

538 House Odds

In House simulations, 538 says Republicans win control 55 times out of 100

Its definition of tossup is a more reasonable 60 percent threshold, with ten seats defined as tossup.

The 538 projection is 219 seats to 216. That’s a genuine tossup.

How Much of a Political Lagging Indicator is Nate Silver?

Polymarket has Trump 54.9 to Harris 44.7. Yesterday Nate Silver has Harris 51.8 to Trump 47.9.

On October 12, I asked How Much of a Political Lagging Indicator is Nate Silver?

Based on momentum and the idea that Silver using too many stale polls, I suggest that Polymarket has better odds. Either way, it’s close to a tossup. No one knows if Harris or Trump is overweighted.

I would rather be in Trump’s shoes. Silver says the opposite.

Note: Silver just posted new odds. They are now 51.0 Harris to 48.7 Trump. The rest is a recount.

As expected in this corner, momentum is slowly eating into the alleged lead of Harris.

There are 22 days remaining. Don’t pretend you know who will win. You don’t. Nor does anyone else.

Republicans Increasingly Likely to Flip the Senate

Meanwhile, in case you missed it, please see Republicans Increasingly Likely to Flip the Senate According to NYT/Siena Poll

The best news for Republicans is not the uptick in polls for Trump.

Rather, the best Republican news is the likelihood they can avoid a devastating Democrat sweep if Trump were to lose.

Polymarket has Republican odds of taking the Senate at 77.5 percent. That seems about right.

Red Wall vs Blue Wall: Trump Has a Much Easier Path to a Victory

Finally, please see Red Wall vs Blue Wall: Trump Has a Much Easier Path to a Victory

There are scenarios where Trump could lose Georgia or North Carolina and still win.

It is much more unlikely Harris could suffer a loss in Pennsylvania or Michigan and win.

Tyler Durden Tue, 10/15/2024 - 12:40

Last Time Halloween Shoppers Spent Less, It Was...

Zero Hedge -

Last Time Halloween Shoppers Spent Less, It Was...

The National Retail Federation's annual Prosper Insights & Analytics survey shows that total Halloween spending is forecasted to drop by 5% to $11.6 billion this year, down from last year's record $12.2 billion. With inflation still elevated and interest rates sky-high, low- to mid-tier consumers are expected to cut back on seasonal splurges this fall.

The survey asked nearly 8,000 consumers about their Halloween shopping plans in the first week of September. Respondents, on average, said they planned to spend around $103.63, about $4.62 less than last year's record of $108.24. This means some households (working-poor ones) are reducing purchases of costumes, decorations, and party supplies. 

Additional color on NRF's survey:

Seventy-two percent of consumers plan to celebrate Halloween this year, consistent with last year's record of 73%. Top holiday activities include handing out candy (67%), decorating their home or yard (52%), dressing up in costume (49%), carving a pumpkin (43%) and throwing or attending a party (29%).

Slight decline in participation compared with last year. 

"Halloween marks the official transition to the fall season for many Americans, and consumers are eager to get a jump start on purchasing new seasonal décor and other autumnal items," NRF Vice President of Industry and Consumer Insights Katherine Cullen wrote in a statement, adding, "Retailers are prepared to meet this early demand by offering shoppers all the holiday essentials to make this year's celebrations memorable."

Bloomberg noted that NRF's dismal outlook for the Halloween spending season is yet another "blow for heavily indebted retailers," adding to the continued pressure on spending slowdowns from low—to mid-tier consumers. 

More from Bloomberg:

"2024 has been a perfect storm for retailers of all stripes," said Erica Weisgerber, a partner at law firm Debevoise & Plimpton LLP. "Inflation, high operational costs, and reduced consumer spending have been especially challenging for brick-and-mortar retailers, and online retailers have struggled with steep competition from e-commerce giants like Amazon."

Many of the troubled firms, including Michaels and At Home Group Inc., are owned by private equity managers after buyouts during the pandemic proved ill-timed when interest rates rose and inflation crimped household budgets. Home, clothing and hobby retailers dominate the list of distressed retailers because the size of their debt means they lack the liquidity to compete with better capitalized competitors, according to Moody's Ratings.

The bigger picture is that the dismal Halloween spending outlook may indicate a continued souring consumer environment that worsens from here. And this could be a bellwether for the big holiday spending season, which kicks off on Black Friday and Cyber Monday in late November.

Tyler Durden Tue, 10/15/2024 - 11:40

Time Magazine Owner Blasts Harris For Rejecting Interview Requests

Zero Hedge -

Time Magazine Owner Blasts Harris For Rejecting Interview Requests

Via HeadlineUSA.com,

The owner of Time magazine blasted Vice President Kamala Harris for rejecting multiple interview requests from the prominent left-leaning publication ahead of November’s election.

Marc Benioff, the billionaire co-founder of Salesforce, bought Time magazine in 2018. He noted that since he’s been in charge of the publication, every presidential candidate has agreed to sit down for interviews during their campaigns, including former President Donald Trump and President Joe Biden.

Harris, however, has rebuffed every one of the magazine’s interview requests.

“Despite multiple requests, TIME has not been granted an interview with Kamala Harris — unlike every other Presidential candidate,” Benioff wrote on X.

“We believe in transparency and publish each interview in full,” he continued. “Why isn’t the Vice President engaging with the public on the same level? #TrustMatters #TransparencyMatters #Leadership.”

Despite Harris’s rejections, Time magazine published another predictably glowing profile of Harris on Friday.

The magazine published a similar puff-piece about Harris in August, after the vice president took over the top of the Democratic ticket. Harris also refused to speak to Time then.

For most of her campaign, Harris has avoided the media. In the past couple of weeks, however, Harris has opted to appear on friendlier shows, including The ViewThe Howard Stern Show and The Late Show with Stephen Colbert.

The result has been a cataclysmic drop in the polls for Harris, who is now in a dead-heat with Trump, according to the latest NBC polls.

The poll marks a five-point drop for Harris from NBC’s last poll in September, which found her leading Trump 49% to 44%.

“As summer has turned to fall, any signs of momentum for Kamala Harris have stopped,” said Democratic pollster Jeff Horwitt, who conducted this survey with Republican pollster Bill McInturff. 

Horwitt noted that Harris’s initial refusal to sit down for interviews likely hurt her, since voters still have significant questions about her campaign and its proposals.

“The challenge for Kamala Harris: Can she meet the moment and fill in the blanks that voters have about her?” he said.

She is scheduled to be interviewed by Fox News host Bret Baier later this week, in what could prove to be her biggest challenge yet.

Although the appearance that Harris is losing momentum may be a negative, it could also be the latest leg in her astroturfed three-month-old campaign with early voting now open in many swing states. The perception that she is tied or trailing may help drive more Democrats to the polls in advance of Election Day.

Tyler Durden Tue, 10/15/2024 - 11:20

Bank of America Trading Results Beat As Net Interest Yield Hits Cycle Lows, Charge-Offs Unexpectedly Hit 11 Year High

Zero Hedge -

Bank of America Trading Results Beat As Net Interest Yield Hits Cycle Lows, Charge-Offs Unexpectedly Hit 11 Year High

It wasn't just Goldman Sachs that reported better than expected Q3 earnings this morning: on the surface, Bank of America surprised to the upside as well, and in fact its FICC division reported an even better results than Goldman's. The bank, which had gotten Warren Buffett's seal of disapproval, after the billionaire investors dumped much of his shares in what was once a Top 5 position, performed better than expected as it benefited from volatile markets while net interest income topped analysts’ estimates. On the other hand, there were also quite a few red flag, with the company's Net Interest Yield sliding to a cycle low even as charge offs and credit losses jumped to the highest in years.

Here is a snapshot of what BofA reported in Q3:

  • Revenue net of interest expense $25.35 billion, beating estimate $25.27 billion
    • Trading revenue excluding DVA $4.94 billion, beating estimate $4.57 billion
      • FICC trading revenue excluding DVA $2.94 billion, beating estimate $2.77 billion
      • Equities trading revenue excluding DVA $2.00 billion, beating estimate $1.81 billion
    • Investment banking revenue $1.40 billion, beating estimate $1.24 billion
    • Wealth & investment management total revenue $5.76 billion, beating estimate $5.63 billion
  • EPS $0.81, beating estimates of $0.77

Taking a closer look at the Global Markets group, revenue from equity and fixed income, currencies and commodities trading rose 12% to $4.93 billion in the third quarter:

  • FICC revenue increased 8%, to $2.9BN, beating estimates of $2.8BN, "driven primarily by improved client activity and trading performance in currencies and  interest rate products"
  • Equities revenue increased 18%, to $2.0BN, beating estimates of $1.8BN "driven by strong client activity and trading performance in cash and derivatives"

Similar to Goldman, BofA's investment banking also outperformed expectations, a sign that the long-awaiting rebound in dealmaking is taking hold. The company benefited from “year-over-year growth in investment banking and asset management fees, as well as sales and trading revenue,” CEO Brian Moynihan said in the statement.

Investment-banking revenue rose 15% to $1.40Bn, better than analysts expected amid renewed strength in dealmaking. Fees for advising on mergers and acquisitions fell 14%, less than the almost 24% decline analysts had expected. Revenue from equity and debt issuance increased 16% and 37%, respectively.

Not everything was stellar however: the second-largest US bank said that net interest income, a key source of revenue for the company, fell 2.9% to $14 billion, the lowest of the cycle; still this was better than the 3.4% drop analyst had expected (on an FTE basis, NII was $14.11 billion, also better than the estimate of $14.07 billion). The number increased $0.3B from 2Q24, driven by fixed-rate asset repricing, higher NII related to Global Markets (GM) activity, and one additional day of interest accrual, partially offset by higher deposit costs; it also decreased $0.4B YoY, as higher deposit costs more than offset higher asset yields, higher NII related to GM activity, and loan growth. Overall, BofA's net interest yield came in at 1.92%, down both sequentially and YOY, and just below the estimate 1.93%. And now that the Fed is cutting rates again, that's as good as it gets for BofA's NII.

 

It wasn't just the Net Interest Yield that left much to be desired: similar to JPM, BofA's provision for credit losses unexpectedly rose to the highest in years, and was $1.54 billion in Q3, higher than the $1.53 billion estimates with a Q3 net reserve build of $8MM in 3Q24 vs. net reserve release of $25MM in 2Q24; This was the highest since the covid crash!

Charge offs also rose to $1.534 billion, above the $1.5 billion estimate and a 0.58% charge off ratio. This may come as a surprise to anyone looking at the stock which is still up, if not for long, and thinking that the results were somehow much better than expected.

According to the bank, commercial net charge-offs of $490MM increased $16MM; this was driven by commercial and industrial NCOs which increased $111MM, driven by two borrowers; at the same time commercial real estate NCOs declined $101MM.

 

On the spending side of the income statement, things were generally in line with expectations:

  • Non-interest expenses $16.48 billion, estimate $16.49 billion
  • Compensation expenses $9.92 billion, estimate $9.9 billion

Here is some other data:

  • Return on average equity 9.44%, estimate 9.01%
  • Return on average assets 0.83%, estimate 0.78%
  • Return on average tangible common equity 12.8%, estimate 12.2%
  • Basel III common equity Tier 1 ratio fully phased-in, advanced approach 13.5%, estimate 13.5%
  • Standardized CET1 ratio 11.8%, estimate 11.9%

Looking at the balance sheet, we find:

  • Loans $1.08 trillion, estimate $1.07 trillion
  • Total deposits $1.93 trillion, estimate $1.93 trillion

Shares of Bank of America, which gained 24% this year through Monday, climbed 1.4%, but were well off session highs, and we expect it to close red as investors override the euphoria algo kneejerk reaction.

BofA Q3 investor presentation below (pdf link)

Tyler Durden Tue, 10/15/2024 - 11:00

Empire Fed Manufacturing Crashes From 30-Month High To 5-Month Low...

Zero Hedge -

Empire Fed Manufacturing Crashes From 30-Month High To 5-Month Low...

After nine straight months of 'contraction', September's surge to 30-month highs in the Empire Fed's Manufacturing survey was greeted by all as proof that Bidenomics (or something...) was working and everything was awesome once again... so vote for Kamala...

October is a very different matter as the survey crashed from +11.5 to -11.9 - the lowest since May. That is the biggest MoM drop since January...

Source: Bloomberg

A measure of current new orders plunged nearly 20 points to -10.2 after climbing a month earlier to the highest since April 2023.

The index of shipments decreased almost 21 points to minus 2.7.

The employment index, however, rebounded to 4.1 - the first expansion in a year - while a measure of hours worked also climbed.

Meanwhile, the New York Fed’s gauge of prices paid for materials increased to a six-month high of 29, while an index of prices received by state manufacturers also accelerated.

Finally, to add further confusion, at the same time, the six-month outlook for overall activity increased to a three-year high of 38.7, indicating the state’s manufacturers are more upbeat about the economy’s prospects.

...baffle 'em with bullshit is back.

Tyler Durden Tue, 10/15/2024 - 08:43

Transcript: Joe Lonsdale, 8VC

The Big Picture -

 

 

The transcript from this week’s, MiB: Joe Lonsdale of 8VC, Palantir, Adapar & Opto, is below.

You can stream and download our full conversation, including any podcast extras, on Apple Podcasts, SpotifyYouTube, and Bloomberg. All of our earlier podcasts on your favorite pod hosts can be found here.

~~~

This is Masters in business with Barry Riol on Bloomberg Radio

00:00:16 [Speaker Changed] This week on the podcast. Wow, this is really so exciting to share with you. We hosted a conference out in Huntington Beach, California. My firm Ri Holsworth Management, along with Advisor Circle called Future Proof. It’s a giant event on the beach in Huntington Beach, California. Part of the event is a series of panels and interviews and fireside chats. I got to sit down with Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale. He, he’s really a fascinating guy. He’s been a serial entrepreneur managing money for Peter Thiel, interning initially at, of All places PayPal, which he then just one successful company after another. Just a fascinating guy. So we spoke for about 30, 35 minutes. I thought the conversation was fascinating. We talked not only about Palantir and the defense industry and how the world of warfare is changing. Lonsdale is a serial entrepreneur who has had success after success after success and is still a relatively young guy. And there’s more fascinating things to come from him. Here it is my discussion with Palantir’s Joe Lonsdale in Huntington Beach at Futureproof 2024. So I just highlighted a handful of things about your career, but I really want to delve into the specifics. You’re at Stanford studying computer science, and somehow you land a job as an intern at PayPal. Tell us a little bit about that.

00:01:58 [Speaker Changed] Well, this was, this was a pretty cool place. So Elon Musk with his smartest friends started the company back then in the nineties called X and Peter Thiel and his smartest friends started Infinity and they were two of eight competitors and they decided rather destroy each other to merge. It was actually interesting times, like people were working so hard that some of the people working for Peter at one point had not gotten enough sleep and were suggesting ways to bomb the office of, of the other guys. They realized this is barely bad, we should probably stop this. And, and so the companies merged a foreign PayPal and a lot of the most talented people from Stanford Computer Science went there at that time. It was a amazing place. Elon kept trying to rename PayPal back to x.com, which they didn’t let him do. So I guess he eventually got his way 20 years later with, with Twitter. But no, it, it, it was a, it was a really fun place to learn and a lot of my friends there, these guys were like 10 or 15 years older than me. A lot of people who were working there ended up going on to start YouTube and, and Yelp and, you know, LinkedIn and all sorts of great companies. So it was, it is a fun place to learn. Right.

00:02:56 [Speaker Changed] That that was quite a brain trust over there. Yeah. Your next role is at Peter Teal’s hedge fund, Clarion Capital. You describe that as one of the top intellectual think tanks in the world. Tell us a little bit about your experience working with Teal at Clarion Capital.

00:03:13 [Speaker Changed] Yeah, sure. That was a global macro hedge fund, and so that’s a really fun part of finance where you just get to try to figure out at a high level what’s going on in the world and lots of arguments about politics and economics and history and financial markets. And you try to, on one hand it’s quantitative. You’re modeling different things like, you know, the Australian currency versus the price of commodities versus, you know, what’s going on in, in in China. And on the other hand, you’re kind of just, just discussing what’s gonna happen in the next five or 10 years. And we, we, you know, we, we had a really good 10 year run, but while I was there, I tried to hire a bunch of my smartest friends to help us and they thought finance was boring. And we started a project based on how PayPal was going after all the bad guys. ’cause you know, the Chinese and Russian mafia had been stealing our money at PayPal and we ended up building these investigative tools and, and, and creating Palantir out of there. So that’s what, that’s what I ended up doing instead. So,

00:04:02 [Speaker Changed] So I just wanna put a little flesh on the bones. You said you had a pretty good run. You ended up with a very nice 10 year track record, but first two years out of the gate, something like plus 30% and plus 50%. Am I getting those numbers about right?

00:04:17 [Speaker Changed] Yeah, I mean, if you want to know, this is macro finance, right? So it’s a fun area. Like an example of one of the best trades we’ve figured out that worked for a few years is Greenspan had cut interest rates and there is more money than ever before going into the GSEs, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. And so you had this massive amount of money there and because these guys were so big, when they would hedge their mortgage portfolios, it would move all the global fixed income. And so, so, so what happened was, you remember like in late 2002, you had like five, 6% interest rates and, and, and it rates started to fall. And so people started refinancing their homes. And when people start refinancing their homes, the duration of mortgages goes down. So in order to balance the durations, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had to buy huge amounts of 10 year notes.

00:05:01 But what they had to buy so much that it actually made their interest rates go lower, which led to more refinancing, which led to have them having buying more. So it was this feedback effect and you’re able to measure the feedback effect. You got down to like one year duration, 3%, 10 year notes back then. And, and, and then all of a sudden it was snapped back really quickly ’cause all the money was seeing in the economy. So anyway, you can kind of map this stuff out, figure out how to trade fixed income. We, we, you know, it’s a fun, fun environment

00:05:23 [Speaker Changed] That, that must’ve been a fun environment. So, so you mentioned Palantir, I have to mention, how old were you when you were one of the co-founders of Palantir? You were a young guy.

00:05:33 [Speaker Changed] I was 21. That’s, I’m 40, I’m 42 now. So that was a long time ago.

00:05:37 [Speaker Changed] A and since now we’re gonna talk about Palantir. Congratulations. They’re entering the s and p 500. It’s,

00:05:44 [Speaker Changed] It’s an awesome milestone at,

00:05:46 [Speaker Changed] At 21. Did you ever imagine something like that happening? Yeah,

00:05:49 [Speaker Changed] I was a pretty obnoxious kid. So, you know, actually when Palantir was great, we, we gave offers. So we were known for having the top engineering culture. Peter was investor in Facebook at the time. So our competition was Palantir and Facebook for the best engineers. And you really had to convince these people this is gonna be a big upside place. And so you’d give them offers and you give ’em three options. They could have a higher salary, but less equity, less stock, you know, medium, medium where you have a lower salary but more stock. And I drop on the option for the first 200 people. We’d put a table and we’d say, here’s how much your stock might be worth if this company’s worth half a billion dollars or a billion dollars or $5 billion. And I got so much shit for including $5 billion as one of the possibilities. People are like, this is ridiculous, Joe. And the

00:06:30 [Speaker Changed] Market cap today,

00:06:31 [Speaker Changed] That’s about 82 billion now.

00:06:33 [Speaker Changed] So it worked out for, it

00:06:34 [Speaker Changed] Took a, it took a long time, but it worked out

00:06:36 [Speaker Changed] 20 years for $80 billion. It’s a well worth trade. So when the company launches, it’s a big data analytics company. Today the focus is defense, commercial and government. Was this a natural evolution or was there a pivot somewhere along the way? Oh

00:06:53 [Speaker Changed] No, we started the company to kill the bad guys. Yeah, let’s be clear. I don’t know we’re supposed to say that post nine 11, I don’t work there anymore, so I can say it now. Like, we started the company after nine 11 to kill the bad guys and stop attacks. So we ended up helping run the targeting systems in 40 allied countries and wiping out over 10,000 terrorists, including a lot of the most important ones. So I, and it protects civil liberties too, but let’s get the bad guys. Yeah. And, and it turns out the hard data problems you solve when you run that infrastructure could be used for a lot of other things. You’re basically building ontologies of information and workflows and organizing all the data, the government. And when we started pal, the government at the time spent like $38 billion gathering data. So it’s, I don’t even know what it spends now, but massive amounts of information and tens of thousands of databases. How the hell do you make all this stuff talk to each other? And so by, by solving those problems to kind of organize that, it turns out you now have the data in a form where AI can be used really easily. So today Palantir’s really caught the AI wave because it enables AI workflows no one else can.

00:07:49 [Speaker Changed] And am I correct in saying during COV Palantir helped governments figure out how to monitor, how to track how to roll out vaccines? What, what was Palantir’s role during the pandemic?

00:08:02 [Speaker Changed] Yeah, I mean, it, it it’s, it’s, it’s used by the armed forces to organize all their logistics and supplies and everything. So it’s a very similar problem. How do you use all the data coming in about how to prioritize things in a pandemic? ’cause you’re coordinating just massive numbers of things and production and, and all sorts of stuff. I mean, you, you have a lot of Fortune 500 companies using it to manage all of their, and optimize all of their production and distribution. So it obviously it works very well for that, for the pandemic, I think, I think like 36 countries used it for that too. So it was good.

00:08:29 [Speaker Changed] So it’s a proven technology today. What was it like getting governments to recognize the value of this in the early two thousands? They were distracted.

00:08:40 [Speaker Changed] It, it was almost as difficult as it was to get RIAs to take adipar seriously the first five years. So, no, it, it is, it’s actually very funny. I I you, you, you think, you think after Palantir we were like, oh, this is gonna be be easy. No, it’s, it, it’s, listen, governments, governments are very funny. They, they want to use things that are new and innovative, but they want to use things that everyone else is already using. So breaking in is a very chicken and egg problem. It’s very hard. It turns out that there’s a lot of money in the special forces and special operations units who, frankly their lives are a lot more on the line than almost anyone else. ’cause they’re, they’re all, they’re constantly doing really dangerous missions around the world. And then they’re running a lot of the most important things that our armed forces do. And those groups have such bold and such confident people that we’re able to break in work with them, get them to prove that it worked and, and then that kind of set the precedent for other parts of government to then work with us. So thank thank goodness for our special ops groups.

00:09:36 [Speaker Changed] So it wasn’t DARPA that first started with you or would, did you have any work with them?

00:09:41 [Speaker Changed] I think DARPA was helpful a little bit, but it really, the thing that really matters is people using it on the ground where lives are on the line. You, you, you want, if you have something that’s the best you wanna, it’s gonna break in because people need it because they’re, because something, something’s existential where they’re gonna die if they don’t have it, they’re not gonna be able to do the mission if they don’t have it. So DARPA’s more of an academic thing that’s smart, but I’d much rather work with the people whose lives are on the line and, and that that’s how you really break in with the best things.

00:10:05 [Speaker Changed] You mentioned Adipar and, and ai, just so you know, chat, GBT is what told me it was $5 trillion, not seven. Well,

00:10:14 [Speaker Changed] Chat GBT is behind.

00:10:16 [Speaker Changed] So, so you found the company in 2009 today, you’re the chairman. It began life as a cloud-based software platform specializing in data aggregation, analytics, and reporting of portfolios. What was the original business model?

00:10:33 [Speaker Changed] Well, you know, I had my family office at first right around then, it was a smaller family office. And then I had a lot of friends and people I talked to who ran me off family offices, who ran RAs. There were new groups on the west coast, like iconic and others building, building these firms around the tech world on RA land. And everyone hated their software. And I looked at it and it was like, this is a mess and there’s not a really good solution here. And, and you know, we were mapping out, there’s a lot of new possibilities thanks to the cloud, thanks to what you could do with data. So we said, let’s, let’s build something that’s better. And, and I naively thought we would have something that was significantly better within a year or two. It turned out it took us hundreds of millions of dollars in several years, but I, but I am quite confident it’s the best at this point.

00:11:13 [Speaker Changed] So, so the genesis was, hey, I have to manage my own capital and the tools aren’t good, I’m gonna create it or was the original plan, I have an idea and everybody should be using it. It

00:11:24 [Speaker Changed] Was, it was a business. I I think in general, in general, when you have like a, some, an area that you realize is broken for you and for people, you know, rather than just build it for yourself, I think it’s like, it’s a good excuse to build a business around it. So I, I was actually CEO full-time for a few years getting us off the ground. Eric Poer, who’s running it forever, 10 years now, is a much better CEO than me. So I’m, I’m a proud chairman now. But no, we, we built it as a business. I, I mean, listen, you guys, we, when we first hooked, there’s 7,000 custodians in the US and so when we first hooked up data, the biggest custodians are people like Fidelity and Schwab and others. And I, we get this all set up. We spent like, you know, a bunch of time on the first year we hook up the live data we’re getting going and it’s all wrong. And we’re like, oh, what do we do wrong? And no, and it turns out even those custodians just have bad data. This is, space is a mess. There’s, there’s shows out, there’s lots of hard problems to solve to make this stuff all work right together. So it, it is a and everyone wants to customize things differently. Every RIA has their own like way of doing things, their own way of showing things. And so, which we, it turned out it took us several more years to get it right.

00:12:22 [Speaker Changed] So, so $7 trillion, you have some very large RIAs on it, you have broker dealers like Morgan Stanley on it. How big can Adapar scale?

00:12:33 [Speaker Changed] Well, I think there’s about $250 trillion globally that’s addressable. Maybe only 150 to 200 of that would use a resolution. So even though we’re growing really quickly now, I think we’re growing like over 30% a year still. We are still probably, at least in our decade of, of of fast growth. I mean, this is a giant market and you know, we’re still learning. I think, I think they’re still learning every, every week from clients about how to serve ’em better. There’s, there’s, I think about 1200 firms or so, give or take on the platform now. And, and you know, I, I’d love to see ’em triple that over the next, over the next few years.

00:13:04 [Speaker Changed] So the most of what APAR focuses on our private, our public markets, stocks, bonds, mutual funds, ETFs. But you also said, Hey, this private market thingy is gonna get big one day. Well, being

00:13:16 [Speaker Changed] Able to report on every possible thing someone owns is key for add part, but add, add part itself doesn’t help people access the private markets. So,

00:13:22 [Speaker Changed] So let’s talk a little bit about Opto and that platform. The idea behind Opto and your chairman of Opto investments is to focus on private markets. Tell us what you see in that space. Well,

00:13:36 [Speaker Changed] Well what I saw is that the way people tend to come to you, so, so obviously I run an investment firm. A lot of my friends run investment firms. I have a lot of strong opinions about private markets, right? And this, this is an area where in the 1990s there was a lot more public companies and there’s a small number of private companies today you have more private companies and public companies and, and, and frankly a lot of my smartest friends, people doing things that are changing how the world works are mostly doing that within private companies. And so today, if you’re not accessing private markets, you’re gonna get left way behind your returns. I think especially in the next 10 years, given how AI’s changing productivity in so many parts of our economy, we could talk about, it’s very clear you get left behind and that it’s messed up that a lot of people don’t have access to what’s clearly the higher returning areas if they’re done right.

00:14:22 And, and what I saw is the way people were trying to sell people on private market stuff is, is basically purely a brokerage model where they come to your firm and they say, we’re gonna make money by selling you kind of mediocre crap. That’s how a lot of these things operate. And I think that’s, that’s actually frankly disgusting. It’s not, it’s just not, it’s just misaligned. Like it’s not how any of us would do business normally, is that you, you don’t want to put money into the things that you’re getting paid to put money into. You wanna, you, you wanna have an aligned model where we all make money together by accessing the best things and private markets, especially venture capital. But frankly, certain parts of pe, certain parts of of alt credit, all these other things, they have very high disparity. You really want to get in the top decile, top quartile stuff and you’re gonna do great.

00:15:03 And if you get into mediocre stuff, you’re gonna have mediocre results. And so, so just the whole space just seemed misaligned to me. And then on top of that, it’s really stressful for a lot of people to get all their clients into these things ’cause there’s just lots more paperwork, lots of messes, lots of legal stuff. And like why, why not make it as close as possible to doing something in the public markets to do something in private markets? And really technology and AI can’t solve that. So opto, it’s about making people aligned, is having one platform where you do everything and, and frankly it’s about using my network and my friends networks to put what we think is the very best stuff on it that my family office is doing. And let’s share that with others.

00:15:38 [Speaker Changed] So at this event, we have over 2000 RIAs of these, some of them are single practice, small, small operations. Some are really big firms with tens of billions, hundreds of billions of dollars on them. How can large and small firms integrate opto into their practice? Yeah,

00:15:59 [Speaker Changed] Like, I mean the goal there, there are, there are both lots of small firms and some very large firms now on Opto. The goal is that it makes it as easy as possible, similar to Adapar, which has obviously been around longer. It is a giant, giant company now. I mean, opto is growing very quickly and we wanna learn from res like what about this could be easier for, for you to use it? But we have dozens of firms that have, that have created custom funds on it for their clients and access things that I think otherwise they never would’ve accessed. And it made it really easy for ’em to do it. So no, I would love people’s feedback on what we’re doing here. This is a younger company but growing really fast and I’m, I’m really proud to kind of get people the best access in the alt world. I think this iss such a fun, interesting world that a lot of people may don’t know how to approach if they, you know, if they haven’t been doing it in the past or if they have been doing some, but maybe they don’t have certain expertise in other areas. Sometimes for our custom funds, like they’ll choose certain areas, certain managers they know, but then we’ll compliment it and help them do that with other areas they haven’t studied as much. And so, you know, with a lot of people’s feedback.

00:16:54 [Speaker Changed] So you wear a lot of hats. You’re cha chairman of apar, you’re deeply involved in Opto. Tell us about your day job. Eight vc, a venture capital firm.

00:17:04 [Speaker Changed] Yeah, no, at the end of the day I’m an entrepreneur. I like to build things and a lot, a lot of the people from from Palantir, from Adipar have gone on to build, build lots of our companies. And so I’ve been coaching, I started coaching a lot of them. So just like with PayPal where we had $16 billion companies come outta it after eBay bought us, Palantir’s now had over a hundred successful companies come out of it that people have started over the last, you know, couple decades. And, and so, you know, I I ended up ended up saying, you know, it makes sense to actually build an investment firm. My mentor told me I basically was doing an investment firm, didn’t have enough money or enough people. So, so we, so the last 12 years we put together a pretty big firm in the venture capital space.

00:17:42 We, we build, we build and launch companies. We back companies early and I mean we’re not, yeah, we, we we, it’s nice in, if you don’t raise big funds, they become very, very oversubscribed. So I’m not here to raise money for HC but it’s a, it’s a fun area. And, and I’ll tell you since you’re asking about there, there’s really two areas that we’re probably really well known for the last few years. One of them is defense. We’ve started multiple new defense companies, including nearby here. We, we actually backed early Andro with Palmer Lucky and some of my ex Palantir colleagues and they’re become a new defense prime, which is really cool if you haven’t checked it out online. There’s amazing videos of the things they’re doing. And then the other, the other two, one of ’em, you know, drone swarms have become a huge problem.

00:18:20 It is really hard to stop. We’re spending $2 million missiles to shoot down cheap little drones with bombs coming in our troops and they’ll swarm a hundred at once. So we figured out how to use new technology to send out microwave radiation really, really far from pretty small, you know, pretty small device to shoot down swarms of drones. And, and we’re now deployed live, it turn turns out the AI chips can get the power to hit the gallium nitrate emitter all at once, turn ’em off. So we build that and we have another company building thousands of ships for the US Navy smaller ships. ’cause it turns out China has 200 times our shipbuilding capacity, which is frankly a huge crisis. You know, it used to be in World War ii, Germans had better ships than we did, but every time we lose a ship you’d build three more.

00:18:57 ’cause we have the best building capacity America now with, with literally 200 times the shipbuilding capacity in China. Very scary for our ability to deter them. So we’re figuring out how to take our best and brightest, frankly, Elon Musk who’s a, who’s a good friend, has like really revitalized advanced manufacturing in America. We’re taking some of that talent, putting it into military areas as well to make sure we stay ahead of the bad guys. So, so we’re doing a lot in defense. And then the one, one other area I’ll mention is what we call AI services. And so there’s a huge part of our economy right now that we can, we’ve shown we can actually double or triple the productivity using ai. And so this is, this is, this is stuff like healthcare, billing, logistics, billing back office processes and the alts world. It’s like how do you, you know, how do you manage and subscribe and deal with all the alts paperwork and stuff. There’s just lots of these areas that are gonna just be completely changed. And so we think there’s multi-trillion dollar opportunities in those areas and building a lot of companies that are succeeding in ’em.

00:19:49 [Speaker Changed] I I wanna stay with defense a little bit ’cause you’re involved in so many really interesting areas. I first heard of Palmer Lucky with the Oculus, which you were an early investor in before I think Facebook ended up buying buying

00:20:02 [Speaker Changed] That they, yeah, Facebook bought it for over $2 billion just a few years. Dan, you made a billionaire at like 22 or something, which will go to your head pretty fast.

00:20:09 [Speaker Changed] And, and then not too long ago maybe it was Wired magazine did a profile on really interesting things that Palmer is doing with drone technology and defense technology. Tell us a little bit about what’s going on in that space.

00:20:23 [Speaker Changed] Yeah, so, so basically Palantir and SpaceX were the first two companies to break in and effectively become some form of defense prime the first new ones in 30 years. ’cause you had, you had all these old primes, they all consolidated after the Cold War ended in the nineties and they basically had a total lock on DC and Palantir. It took us a long time, a lot of stubbornness to break in. And, and then, and and and you know, at some points we had to sue the US government ’cause they were doing crazy things and we won SpaceX similarly had to sue the US government ’cause they just discriminate against new things, right? And obviously SpaceX a good thing they won ’cause they’re obviously a hundred times better than the alternative. Frankly, after doing Palantir, I said this defense stuff is just really stressful. It’s really, you know, hard to break into.

00:21:03 I’m gonna do add APAR instead. Turns out you guys are stressful too. But, but, but you know, I’m like, I I’ve done enough defense and, and and, and we started being pretty bullish on things going on between China and the US and very naively thought the world’s just gonna go in a kind of more peaceful, more prosperous direction. And we saw this guy Xi Jinping come in and I have friends with a lot of the guys who built these companies in China. A lot of them believe in free markets. Reid, Milton Friedman like share a lot of our values. These are not just ’cause they’re Chinese, they’re not bad people. They, you know, they’re not CCP themselves. And and we saw Xi Jinping start cracking down on these guys. A lot of ’em disappeared. They had multiple friends who knew really well who died in their sleep in their forties, you know, after being tech billionaires.

00:21:44 And we saw him also making a lot of our friends force their top engineers to work on defense projects. Obviously we don’t do that in the US but this became very concerning because China does have really top talent and they’re forcing them to build new things in defense hardware. Meanwhile in the us those old companies to consolidated in the nineties, they were hiring basically none of our smartest friends. So this is a crisis. You have China building really new advanced defense things. You have us spending lots of money very wastefully with without top talent. And we said, wow, we need to get back in and fix this. So Palmer with three of my old Palantir guys after, you know, after selling Oculus of Facebook and they kicked him out of Facebook ’cause he, he did some politics, they didn’t like he’s on the right. But, so he and these guys start this new company nearby here and it’s become the most important new defense prime in hardware.

00:22:30 They have all sorts of products. The one you should check out online’s called the Road Runner. If you’ve ever seen Elon’s rockets that kind of go up and and land themselves, he has the same thing for advanced missiles. And so these missiles come in this box and it’ll go up and it’ll track and destroy the bad guys. But if you don’t, does not, if you don’t use it, if it doesn’t explode, it’ll come back and it’ll land and it’ll wait to be used again. And so not only is it like the 12th, the cost of a patriot missile, it also could be reused. We’re actually putting, remember that ep, that EPT company that shoots things down with microwave radiation, we’re putting, gonna put that on it. So you can imagine a swarm of these going, flying, shooting that turning things off and coming back and landing to use it again. And you know, modern warfare is gonna be sworn of autonomous small vessels, small drones like all these things. And, and you, we can’t afford to do what we’ve been doing with the defense primes, which is to build things that are way too expensive kinda last generation’s technology and you’re gonna run out of them against, against the swarms our, our adversaries are gonna have. So we’re, we’re really trying to make sure we stay ahead of them.

00:23:24 [Speaker Changed] So I wanna combine two things. You mentioned the new technologies swarming and the massive over capacity to build ships of China versus the us. What have we learned from the Russian invasion of Ukraine and how Ukrainians are defending themselves with technology? How can that be applied towards any potential invasion of Taiwan by China?

00:23:49 [Speaker Changed] Yeah, so I mean Palantir and Palantir and Andel Palmer’s company are very active in Ukraine doing a lot of, doing a lot of important things there. We’ve learned it’s about dorm drones hors we’ve learned it’s about cost. So for example, the US makes these anti radiation missiles that are $3 million each. We sold 300 of ’em to Poland I think a few months ago for a billion dollars. And these missiles are able to fly in jammers and take ’em out. Russia has figured out how to build these jammers and these jammers by the way, they stop artillery from targeting and they really are dominant on the battlefield. So it’s electronic warfare. They figured out how to build them like 20, $30,000. You can’t win a war with $3 million things being used to take out $30,000. Things you’re just gonna run out of, no matter how rich you are, you’re gonna run outta money on the battlefields.

00:24:31 A war is like an engineering thing where it’s about scarcity, right? And so we’ve learned you have to build cheaper, smarter distributed systems. And you know, the electronic warfare stuff’s fascinating. I listen, there’s a lot of smart people who are against us going into Russia like, well we probably should be careful with nuclear power. So I’m not gonna say this is good or not. But it’s interesting. Ukraine was able to basically create like these electronic warfare bubbles by figuring out how to jam sensors in different ways and kind of create a protection bubble around their forces that then did the major incursion. And it was all about electronic warfare and turning on and off these sensors along with like how to manipulate swarms. And so the ba battlefield is totally changing versus how we would do these things 20 years ago. And we’re trying to make sure we build companies here and, and technology here in response to this and go fast on it.

00:25:16 [Speaker Changed] So, so all these ships that giant ships that China’s building, is it likely or possible that there will be a small autonomous swarm of vessels that counterbalance that?

00:25:29 [Speaker Changed] Well, China’s pretty smart, so I think they’re mostly building submarines which are, which are difficult. But, but yes. So Ciran is the latest company we helped start, it’s run by a former Navy Seal of 11 years in Austin, Texas. A lot of the admirals of the fleet are very involved and what we’re doing is we’re gonna, is we’re even next year in Austin, we’re gonna have 600 ships we build that are 24 feet, 14 feet and six feet. These are weaponized at autonomous vessels. We’re teaching the Navy how to use AI to help them coordinate. So what we showed them when they agree is we can basically triple the battle effectiveness of our fleet by complimenting all the big ships of the line with about 30 smaller weaponized vessels that swarm and coordinate and help in different ways. It’s a, it’s kind of fun, it’s like a little video game sort of thing. I actually have a lot of LA video game talent helping us map it out and practice battles and stuff. But, but no, yes, we have to do lots of small ships if we wanna stay ahead of them. And unfortunately our DOD is not as competent as it used to be, but our private companies are the best in the world. So we’re gonna keep getting involved, same as private companies did in World War II and make sure we stay ahead of the bad guys.

00:26:27 [Speaker Changed] So let’s, let’s shift gears. I wanna talk about OpenGov, which is another product project of yours. You provide software for over 2000 municipalities and state agencies. What was that adoption practice like? How long did that take?

00:26:43 [Speaker Changed] Well we sold OpenGov earlier this year for $1.8 billion to Cox. And you know, originally my friends and I, we were wondering why California was taxing us so much and where they were spending the money. This is about 13, 14 years ago. And so I got about 20 Stanford students and a nonprofit at first and we tried to just like put everything online, it was great. I didn’t have my name on it. So all these students kept getting attacked by the unions ’cause they, they really don’t like it when you show ’em spending lots of money in government departments. It basically showed that California had a bunch of departments that were dominated by these special interests that were spending about 50 to 60% more than you. This was 13 years ago than you’d imagine by the model, right? Of course it’s corrupt. And, and all these cities started emailing us saying, oh this is really cool.

00:27:22 Show us for our spending. Are we doing something good or not? And, and we, and we said, sure, send us the data. And the cities would say, well how do, how do we send the data over? And we looked into it and there’s, there’s tens of thousands of municipalities in the US and they mostly don’t have access to their own information. They have to pay their IT consultants, huge amounts of monies to do a report. They couldn’t even see what they’re spending versus sitting next door for similar services. And so we decided to build this thing called OpenGov and we built a way for them to see all their data and then we realized governments don’t like paying for new things. They only can pay for the things they’re already doing. So we built a bunch of software for them to run all their budgeting and their transparency and their processes and asset management and it’s a just build a big gov tech company.

00:28:00 [Speaker Changed] So I’m kind of fascinated how you’ve bounced across sectors, big data, defense, government, healthcare, finance, even now education. How do you approach learning a space that you have been in before?

00:28:15 [Speaker Changed] Well, you know, the for for, for building these companies and for succeeding as an investor and venture, there’s really two things that matter the most. One is the very top technology, talented technology cultures. So culture is a places like Opta where we’re iterating with you. It’s because we have like these really amazing talented people who are building really quickly and who are speaking to people and getting feedback with them. And then the other thing we’re looking for is like, where is a gap in the world? Where is something, here’s where it could be and here’s where it’s now. So again, with so think go back to Alts and think about that. It’s very clear there’s a gap. The incentives are misaligned for how people are accessing alts. The platforms are wasting a lot of their time and it just isn’t, it’s not easy for them to see what the best things are and to really quickly iterate and, and do do their job for their clients.

00:29:00 And so it’s very obvious there’s a gap there. And so what you do is you, you, you have a hypothesis, you get a really great tech culture where the people at Opto own a bunch of the company themselves are really talented people who’ve had wins before, know how to build and iterate in text from add par, they’re from other places. And then, and then and then you build and you iterate with clients. ’cause no matter how smart we think we are, we’re gonna come to you and show it to you. There’s gonna be things that are wrong. There’s gonna be things that are not useful for you. But because you have a great tech culture, you can iterate very quickly and learn. And so the company’s now been around for a few years now the point where people are starting to really love it ’cause they’ve been, you know, doing it based on feedback. So when you approach a new space, it’s not about being an expert in this space. It’s about having a really amazing culture that talks to the experts and learns from them and builds with them over time.

00:29:44 [Speaker Changed] And Joe, I love this quote of yours and I have to ask you about it. My passions are repairing broken industries and government in calculating classical virtues, prioritizing families and enabling a free and prosperous society. Sounds like

00:30:01 [Speaker Changed] That kind kind of politician,

00:30:03 [Speaker Changed] Right? You’re running for, well discuss the quote, I can’t imagine you’re ever running for office. Are you?

00:30:09 [Speaker Changed] Sounds like it’d be a horrible job to be honest. I listen, I I our society is facing a lot of really broken things right now. There’s a lot of stuff that’s wrong and I think, I think vir classical virtues are missing in our society. I think courage is is not a virtue that’s taught to our elite. If you go to a top 100 university, you are taught the opposite of courage. You’re taught to shut up virtue signal, go along, don’t think for yourself, don’t oppose the borg, whatever they say is right. And, and, and it’s really broken. I think it’s really scary what we face in our society right now. So, you know, I, I think the fundamental units of the west are, are the classical virtues, are the liberty values around the enlightenment are our functional families with two parent households. I think these are all things that make our society functional. And if we don’t say it and we don’t fight for it, we’re gonna have a really broken society. Alright,

00:30:56 [Speaker Changed] I we have time for a couple of questions from Slido. Let’s take a look. What do you look for when evaluating fund managers for yourself and your family office?

00:31:07 [Speaker Changed] So when I’m looking for fund managers, ob I mean, for me, because I have a network of these people, I, I I, I want to know that a lot of my friends really respect them. I wanna know they have some unfair advantages. I wanna know that they have obviously an amazing track record. And then I wanna know that there’s some reason why they’re still in the game and focus. I think a lot of people who’ve had a lot of success, there’s various things happening in their lives and they’re no longer working, they no longer have the same culture. So I mean, I want, I wanna know the culture of the organization around them at their fund and know that they are still working as hard as they were when they first created that, you know, for that first success. ’cause I, because that’s, that’s something that slips very easily. So you gotta watch out for it.

00:31:44 [Speaker Changed] And, and here’s a perfect question to wrap up on. What are the most exciting trends you’re seeing in the marketplace today?

00:31:52 [Speaker Changed] So the, the most exciting trend by far, I started to hint at it earlier, is what’s going on with applying AI to services industries. There’s about $5 trillion of wages in the US in the services sector. Over $2 trillion of those wages are in areas where we’ve already shown you can double the productivity in some cases triple the cash flow from these old legacy businesses. This is a whole new area of, of tech enabled services that actually works. Now we’re seeing, you know, example healthcare billing, two $80 billion revenue industry, typical margins 20%. We already have companies getting 50, 60% margin fixing that space. There’s a huge parts of our economy where you’re gonna have productivity shoot upwards. If we can manage not to break our country with the stupid government stuff the next several years, we’re gonna have a very productive society.

00:32:36 [Speaker Changed] That was my conversation with Joe Lonsdale. He is the co-founder of Palantir, as well as a number of other finance and technology related startups. I thought the discussion was fascinating and I can’t wait to get him in the studio for a full 90 minutes to really do a deep dive into his career. If you enjoy this conversation, well be sure and check out any of the 500 previously discussions we’ve had over the past 10 years. You can find those at iTunes, Spotify, Bloomberg, YouTube, wherever you find your favorite podcasts. And be sure and check out my new shortform podcast at the Money 10 minute discussions with experts about topics related to your money, earning it, spending it, and most importantly, investing it at the money in the Masters in Business feed or wherever you get your favorite podcasts.

~~~

 

 

 

 

The post Transcript: Joe Lonsdale, 8VC appeared first on The Big Picture.

A Diet Low In Starch And Sugar Shows Promise In IBS Relief, Boosts Weight Loss

Zero Hedge -

A Diet Low In Starch And Sugar Shows Promise In IBS Relief, Boosts Weight Loss

Authored by Mary West via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

A recent study from Lund University in Sweden has unveiled a more straightforward path to taming irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Eating less starch and sugar, which describes an eating plan called the starch- and sucrose-reduced diet (SSRD), not only matches the popular low-FODMAP diet in symptom relief but also proved superior in promoting weight loss and curbing sugar cravings.

MattL_Images/Shutterstock

Earlier research suggests that the SSRD is associated with other health advantages, and the low-FODMAP diet has some drawbacks.

Study Compares IBS Treatment Diets

IBS refers to a group of symptoms—primarily abdominal pain, diarrhea, and constipation—that occur without any visible signs of damage to the digestive tract. While the low-FODMAP diet has been the established dietary treatment, a study published in Nutrients in September compares it with an alternative approach. A low-FODMAP diet restricts the intake of certain carbohydrates, including wheat, lactose, fructose, rye, and barley.

In earlier research, SSRD showed promise for reducing IBS symptoms. However, the Nutrients study marks the first direct comparison between SSRD and the low-FODMAP diet.

“We launched this study in 2022 to compare SSRD and Low FODMAP,” Bodil Ohlsson, a professor at Lund University and co-author of the study, said in a press release. The study participants included 155 people with IBS, randomly assigned to follow either the SSRD or low-FODMAP diet for four weeks. At the beginning of the trial, they were not on any particular diet.

The results showed that both diets improved IBS symptoms by 75 percent to 80 percent. Also, at the end of the experiment, the participants in the SSRD group experienced more weight loss and fewer sugar cravings than those in the low-FODMAP group.

SSRD Versus Low-FODMAP Diet

FODMAP stands for fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides and polyols, short-chain carbohydrates resistant to digestion. Doctors recommend the low-FODMAP diet for IBS because high-FODMAP foods tend to produce gas and alter bowel habits.

Despite this advantage, the low-FODMAP diet has the following drawbacks:

  • The low-FODMAP diet excludes many nutritious fruits and vegetables, so restricting these foods in the diet may lead to deficiencies in vitamins and minerals, reported a clinical trial published in the Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.
  • The diet restricts prebiotics—high-fiber foods that increase the beneficial bacterial strains in the gut—potentially harming the gut microbiome.
  • Some people complain about the complexity of the low-FODMAP diet, as it has an extensive list of foods to avoid.

In contrast with the low-FODMAP diet, the SSRD focuses on decreasing sucrose, starch, and added sugar. According to Ohlsson, it is healthy and simple.

We wouldn’t really even call SSRD a diet,” she said in the press release. “It’s how everyone should eat, not just those with IBS,” Ohlsson added. “And unlike the low FODMAP diet, SSRD is easy to understand and easier to follow. You can eat everything when you are invited to dinner, just less of certain things. If you rest your stomach for the rest of the week, you can indulge a little one day!”

Why SSRD Offers Advantages

An array of mechanisms may underlie the positive effects of SSRD, Ohlsson told The Epoch Times in an email.

One factor may involve a rare deficiency in sucrase-isomaltase, an enzyme that breaks down sugar and starch. “Congenital sucrase-isomaltase deficiency is a genetic disease leading to gastrointestinal symptoms in children,” she said. “Increased prevalence of rare variants of sucrase-isomaltase genes has been found in IBS patients, which aligns with improvement of gastrointestinal symptoms by SSRD.”

Another potential mechanism relates to gut microbiota composition. Excess undigested carbohydrates in the bowel can lead to increased fluid secretion, Ohlsson said. The microbiota breaks down the food, leading to gas production. These effects lead to bloating, flatulence, pain, and diarrhea. Since the SSRD reduces carbohydrate intake, it decreases the symptoms that ensue.

Additionally, the weight reduction may also lead to improved symptoms,” she added. “Fat tissue produces inflammatory and hormonal substances, so weight loss leads to reduced secretion of such substances. This may lead to less symptoms by reducing a low-grade inflammation.

The benefits of SSRD in reducing weight and sugar cravings may partly stem from sugar’s low satiety effect, Ohlsson noted. Ingesting sugar leads to the intake of calories with less satiety, resulting in eating more. In contrast, ingesting fat promotes satiety, resulting in eating less. Thus, high sugar consumption results in consuming many more calories.

Following the SSRD

A 2021 study published in Nutrients outlines guidelines for following the SSRD.

The diet recommends increasing the intake of the following:

  • Nonstarchy fruits and vegetables
  • Meat and fish
  • Dairy products without added sugar
  • Butter and oil
  • Fiber-rich grains such as oats, brown rice, and 100 percent whole-grain bread
  • Nuts and seeds

The SSRD also involves avoiding the following:

  • Starchy fruits such as bananas
  • Starchy vegetables such as potatoes, corn, and beans
  • Oat and soy milk
  • Margarine
  • Refined grains and processed breakfast cereals
  • Sugary snacks and beverages
A Gastroenterologist Weighs In

How might the findings from the recent Nutrients study be received in the real world of gastroenterology practice?

Dr. Ashkan Farhadi, a board-certified gastroenterologist at MemorialCare Orange Coast Medical Center in Fountain Valley, California, shared his thoughts in an email interview with The Epoch Times.

He said he found the study very interesting due to the known drawbacks of the low-FODMAP diet and the potential additional benefits of the SSRD. “While there is no question that the low-FODMAP diet works, it is extremely restrictive,” he said. “In fact, most of my patients are not able to handle the low FODMAP because it deprives them of many fruits and vegetables.

“So I’m really happy to have an alternative that is actually very appealing, as nowadays, people are doing low starch and sugar for a variety of reasons,” Farhadi added.

Tyler Durden Tue, 10/15/2024 - 03:30

Ukraine Finally Admits To Russian Breakthrough In Kursk As They Evacuate Sumy

Zero Hedge -

Ukraine Finally Admits To Russian Breakthrough In Kursk As They Evacuate Sumy

For those tracking war maps from both sides of the conflict as well as geo-location data for troop positions, the failure of Ukraine's offensive in Kursk is not a surprise.  The movement of their forces stalled out only a couple weeks after their initial push into the territory and the Russians have been grabbing back pieces of land ever since.  However, for those people only listening to establishment news sources, the retaking of Kursk might come as a shock.

Russian troops have made significant advances from the western flank of Ukrainian positions, and reports indicate a threat of Ukrainian troops being encircled. 

The Telegraph, usually a platform for pro-Ukraine propaganda, notes that sources from both sides confirmed the Russian breakthrough, which occurred during the heaviest fighting on Russian territory since Ukraine began its cross-border incursion in August.

DeepState, a Ukrainian military blogger, said that there was a risk that Russian forces could encircle Ukrainian forces, although they later said that the front lines in Kursk were “difficult but under control”.  “The enemy pushed through the left flank of the Kursk grouping of Ukrainian defense forces,” the blogger said. “We are on the verge of another mess due to the repetition of mistakes.” (Keep in mind, major military "bloggers" in this conflict tend to have connections to government and military officials who give them battlefront information)

It should be noted that DeepState has avoided changing his war maps to reveal significant Russian gains in Kursk for many weeks.  It is likely that he has been dissuaded from doing so by officials in Kyiv in order to present a facade of success in Kursk.  The fact that he is admitting to those gains now suggests the situation is dire for Ukraine.

Russian military bloggers said that marines from the Pacific Fleet’s 155th Guards Brigade had been involved in fighting around the Glushkovsky district of Kursk, where most Ukrainian forces had allegedly been overrun. 

Fears of potential encirclement of Ukrainian troops in Kursk come only days after US officials claimed they could hold the ground for months.

The strategic sense behind Ukraine's Kursk operation remains a mystery.  Vladimir Zelensky claims the attack was designed to draw Russian troops away from the eastern front in order to slow down their non-stop bulldozing of Ukraine's defensive positions.  Many of these towns and the defensive works around them have been held since 2014.  In other words, the fact that Russia is taking these positions so quickly indicates that something has gone very wrong for Ukraine (And we all know what the problem is - lack of manpower). 

As with all war, the losing side tends to implode all at once after a long period of seemingly static and secure defenses.

If the goal was really to divert the Russians away from the east, then the Kursk offensive achieved nothing.  The Kremlin actually increased their forces and attacks in the region after the Kursk event.  John Foreman, a former British military attaché in both Moscow and Kyiv, states:

“Russian progress actually picked up after Kursk...Politically, the Kursk offensive didn’t change much in Washington DC or Europe. I’m still unconvinced of its strategic merit.”

Kyiv's recent declaration of a mandatory evacuation of more than 37,000 civilians from the Sumy Oblast region just across the border from Kursk provides more evidence that the area is about to be retaken by Russia.  It seems like the Kursk incursion was fuel for the western media hype machine, but other than that the effort served no strategic purpose.

Tyler Durden Tue, 10/15/2024 - 02:45

After Summit Snub, UK Government "Absolutely Ready To Engage" With Musk

Zero Hedge -

After Summit Snub, UK Government "Absolutely Ready To Engage" With Musk

Via OilPrice.com,

Technology Secretary Peter Kyle has suggested that Elon Musk was not invited to the government’s international investment summit due to his tendency to avoid such events. 

Previous reports suggested Musk, the owner of X and Tesla, was omitted from the guest list following controversial social media comments he made regarding Britain’s summer riots, where he controversially claimed civil war was “inevitable.”

In response to the snub, Musk recently said on X:

“I don’t think anyone should go to the UK when they’re releasing convicted pedophiles in order to imprison people for social media posts.”

However, in an interview with Times Radio this morning, Kyle said:

“Elon Musk has never come to any of the past investment summits that have been held under the previous government, he doesn’t tend to do these sort of events, but I stand absolutely ready to engage with him, to talk about any potential global investments he’s making – I’m not aware of any at this moment in time.”

He added that “we have good engagement with some of his companies” and praised Musk for the safe landing of his booster rocket yesterday.

On Sky News today, Kyle also denied that Musk was not invited because he called the prime minister “two tier Kier”.

The international investment summit, taking place today, will see Prime Minister Keir Starmer pledge to slash red tape that is hindering investment in the UK.

Australian infrastructure giant Macquarie is expected to announce £20bn in new investment in the UK, and total pledges from businesses at the summit could reach as high as £50bn. 

High profile speakers at the event include Blackrock boss Larry Fink, former Google chairman Eric Schmidt, ex-England manager Gareth Southgate, and Aviva chief Amanda Blanc. 

X did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Tyler Durden Tue, 10/15/2024 - 02:00

'Our Democracy' Marks 'Their Duplicity'

Zero Hedge -

'Our Democracy' Marks 'Their Duplicity'

Authored by Thaddeus McCotter via American Greatness,

Presently, we are embroiled in a presidential campaign. It is the apex of political messaging, as both parties and their well-heeled allies bombard the electorate with varying promises, claims, smears, and deceits.

One of the Democrats’ and their “Never Trump” cohorts’ favorite narratives is that the GOP candidate, former president Trump, is divisive and that he must be defeated to allow the Democrat nominee, Vice President Harris, to unite the nation. To believe this, one must concur with the Democrats and Never Trumpers on two counts: first, Mr. Trump, his MAGA supporters, and the GOP are divisive; and, second, Ms. Harris and the Democrats are not divisive but rather a unifying political force.

For purposes of this piece, let us stipulate Mr. Trump and his MAGA and GOP supporters are “divisive,” if only for the simple reason they dissent from the Democrats radical, extreme, and dangerous agenda; and, moreover, unapologetically champion the populist and conservative principles and policies they believe will promote and protect the liberty, prosperity, and security of our free republic.

Nonetheless, even with this stipulation, it is impossible for an objective mind to conclude Ms. Harris and her Democrat supporters are a unifying force within our deeply divided nation. The Democrats are, by design, a divisive party that premises its campaigns and policies upon identity politics—race, gender, class, etc.; and, at root, offers the electorate varying and increasing levels of paranoia and dependence upon the Leviathan—i.e., the administrative state, which is controlled by their cohorts who are ensconced within the unaccountable and remunerative sinecures housed in the bowels of the federal bureaucracy.

Consider the Democrats’ demanding the citizenry’s obeisance to their DIE (“diversity, inclusivity, and equity”) secular religion, which one is compelled to believe above all else.

The left defines “diversity” with external traits, not internal thoughts. In sum, this inherently divides the entire population by physical traits and social castes into “manageable” political blocs—the “Balkanization” of the American electorate. Their root fallacy is that how you look determines how you think. The left purports it is using one’s “lived experience” to make this differentiation, but this experience is presumed to have occurred (even if it has not) based on your external appearance and/or economic status. Such a prejudicial pronouncement upon one’s fellow citizens is patronizing, demeaning, and—in its most heinous manifestations—racist. (Why do you think progressives have expended so much energy trying to redefine and dilute the definition of “racism” to weaponize it against, not racists, but non-leftists?)

Once an individual has been pigeonholed into one of the Democrats’ diversity classifications and it is marked with its “social credit” connotations, these leftist social engineers will cajole and coerce them into their “inclusive” collective, wherein what matters is not individual rights but one’s allegiance to the left’s ideological dictates. True, some individual rights and licenses are granted by the state, but they are in addition to our unalienable, God-given rights we already possess and that cannot be infringed by the state. The left disagrees, believing the state is the ultimate grantor of rights and that “Our Democracy” must not be impaired by the antiquated concept of unalienable, God-given constitutional rights. Consequently, the left believes a citizen’s rights are not God-given but rather government-given. As such, they constitute not unalienable rights; they are arbitrary and conditional licenses. This subordinates the citizens’ sovereignty to the supremacy of the state.

As the Supreme State doles its licenses, it will decide what is “equitable.” This is merely another of the left’s euphemisms for socialism—as is Ms. Harris’s “Opportunity Society.” But once citizens have been civically and economically diminished by the Democrats’ delineating and dividing them on basis of physical traits and economic status and by being subsumed into a leftist collective, Americans will have little recourse to dissent, let alone rid themselves of such a repressive, autocratic socialist regime.

Why would people subject themselves to this DIE agenda? This is where the left’s paranoia pimping enters stage left. The Democrats aver that they and their administrative state are needed to protect citizens from sundry conspiracies out to block Americans’ pursuit of happiness—or worse. Hence, the Greek chorus of Democrats wailing about “Systemic Racism,” “The Patriarchy,” “Threats to Democracy,” and so forth. This is literally a party that smears its opponents as existential threats to “Our Democracy” and demands these opponents be crushed so that they may never again threaten it. Such inherently divisive narratives are designed to lure people into the illusory “security” of the one extant entity capable of controlling Americans’ lives—“Their Government.”

So, how does a progressive manage to believe they are the champions of “Our Democracy,” even as they burn it to the ground to persecute their opponents? By reason of a simple intellectual sleight-of-hand. When Democrats bleat “Our Democracy,” it is a “prog whistle” that, translated, means “Our Party.” Conflating the fortunes of their party with those of the country, the Democrats have the capacity for enormous self-regard that allows them to engage in immense amounts of cognitive dissonance and self-justification as they attempt to foist their reckless, harmful agenda on Americans.

Yes, Republicans also believe their fortunes will save “Our Republic.” But there is a critical distinction. Democrats define “unity” as a uniformity of agreement. Republicans define “unity” as a uniformity of acceptance.

This explains why the Democrats are hellbent to force their DIE ideology on people and why Republicans oppose it. It is an overlooked irony that the left, which obsesses over the diversity of external traits, demands the conformity of internal thoughts. The Twentieth Century is replete with bitter instances of such an ideology’s failed attempts to dictate a rigid uniformity of ideological agreement in the vainglorious hopes of recreating and perfecting humanity.

The answer to such state coercion is still federalism and pluralism. A limited, divided government charged with protecting the unalienable God-given rights of sovereign citizens remains the surest path upon which to pursue one’s happiness. The acceptance required is of the ground rules of the nation—of the constitution, of the peaceable means of effectuating constructive change, of someone else’s thoughts and their right to hold and advocate them, and of your reciprocal right to disagree and oppose their ideas. E pluribus unum—“Out of many, one”—has well served and enriched our nation and must remain the abiding goal.

Again, the left deems federalism and pluralism as bars to the implementation of their autocratic, socialist state, which will determine and map your pursuit of happiness whether you like it or not. It is evinced in why the left crafted the word “diversity” to supplant “pluralism.” Ponder that the root of the word, “div-,” as is found in words such as “divisive,” “divest,” “divorce,” and so forth, that do not exactly scream “unity.”

Nor does their pushing of their “Our Democracy” narrative to supplant the reality we live in a constitutional republic with limits upon its enumerated and citizen-delegated powers; and the duty to serve as a guardian of our unalienable God-given rights and the U.S. Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic—be they a dictator or a mob.

As they do, the left reveals how their clamor and connivance for “Our Democracy” merely mark “Their Duplicity.”

Tyler Durden Mon, 10/14/2024 - 23:25

Oregon DEI Forestry Snitch Busts Boss For Prioritizing Qualified Candidates Over "Gender Identity"

Zero Hedge -

Oregon DEI Forestry Snitch Busts Boss For Prioritizing Qualified Candidates Over "Gender Identity"

Oregon's #2 official at the Department of Forestry, Mike Shaw, was placed on administrative leave after the department's former DEI strategy officer, Megan Donecker, complained that Shaw had looked "beyond gender and identity in hiring, seeking only candidates most qualified for the job," Oregon Live reports.

Megan Donecker, an avid Dungeons and Dragons player, says queer staffers are not safe because they can't have 'conversations around pronouns' at work.   

Donecker first became triggered when Shaw pushed for a more careful approach to DEI - comparing the slide into wokism to speeding on "an icy road." She says that Shaw warned "We don’t go 60 (mph) out of the gate, or we’re gonna crash the car."

What's more, Donecker also reportedly claimed that six homosexual staffers didn't "feel safe or comfortable" at work because they could not have "conversation around pronouns," and referred to the department as a "boys club," the Daily Mail reports further.

The purple-haired Donecker has since quit the department and now works as a DEI consultant, describing herself as an "accomplice to marginalized communities," whatever that means.

The Oregon Department of Forestry didn't directly address the allegations, but said that leadership "takes employee complaints and concerns seriously and, when brought to our attention, we ensure they’re handled in accordance with state laws, rules, policies and HR best practices. This includes protecting employees from retaliation."

"Providing a safe, diverse and inclusive workplace is a shared core value and priority of both the department and the Board of Forestry," said State Forester Cal Mukumoto.

Tyler Durden Mon, 10/14/2024 - 23:00

Will Politicians Toxify Freedom Forever?

Zero Hedge -

Will Politicians Toxify Freedom Forever?

Authored by James Bovard via The Mises Institute,

The official theme song of the Kamala Harris presidential campaign is “Freedom” by Beyonce. But a more accurate theme would be the Rolling Stones classic, Under my Thumb.

Vice President Harris is seeking the presidency as the greatest champion of freedom in modern times.

But Kamala-style freedom will only unleash the government, not private citizens.

The original Bill of Rights created a row of bulwarks for citizens to prevent government oppression. In the era of the American Revolution, it was a common saying: “The Restraint of Government is the True Liberty and Freedom of the People.” But Harris and her running mate, Governor Tim Walz, are offering a “freedom,” seemingly inspired by Yugoslavian communist dictator Tito: “The more powerful the State, the more freedom.”

Harris begins by tacitly presuming that politicians must forcibly save humanity. Harris seeks to vastly expand government intervention to supposedly give people true freedom in daily life. Harris’s “freedom” presumes government is irrevocably benevolent—unless you are a bad person who deserves punishment or subjugation or overtaxing. But the definition of “bad” can be endlessly expanded to include anyone who howls about being fleeced, locked down, or muzzled.

Harris-Walz Freedom requires maximum government interference in daily life. Harris called for a merciless crackdown on misinformation, including punishing social media companies that fail to kowtow to Washington. Walz is emphatic that there is no freedom of speech for “misinformation”—a vague notion which can include any statement disapproved by officialdom. When did America’s most distrusted occupation—politicians—become entitled to define truth and to forcibly suppress and punish what they label “misinformation”?

Under the Harris-Walz standard, Americans will only have the freedom to say anything that the government approves. Walz endorsed a 1919 Supreme Court case that upheld imprisoning anyone who criticized military conscription during World War One. The Biden administration was condemned by federal judges for suppressing millions of comments and jokes by Americans about Covid mandates and shutdowns. But according to liberals, that wasn’t censorship because only reactionaries or deplorables complained about pandemic policies. Plus, Fauci is still a saint. 

Mindy Kaling, an actress and emcee for the third night of the Democratic National Convention, invoked “the freedom to work one job and afford your rent.” The Biden administration floated proposals for nationwide rent control and Harris is championing proposals to stop “price gouging.” To achieve true freedom, bureaucrats would commandeer veto power over any contract dealing with housing or food. And when federal price controls caused devastating shortages, that would simply prove that politicians need even more power over daily life.

At the Democratic National Convention, a Harris campaign video pledged that she would deliver “freedom from extremism.” But that would provide a blank check to suppress any ideas of which politicians disapprove. Newsweek reported last year that the FBI created “a new category of extremists that it seeks to track and counter: Donald Trump’s army of MAGA followers.” To permit politicians to define extremism is to let them preemptively vilify their most dangerous critics. Two years ago, White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre asserted, “When you are not with what majority of Americans are, then you know, that is extreme. That is an extreme way of thinking.” This is a definition of extremism that could put the federal crosshairs on most people who visit this website.

“Freedom from fear” is another Harris-Walz promise. Pledging “freedom from fear” entitles politicians to seize power over anything that frightens anyone. People who sound the alarm about excessive government power will be guilty of subverting freedom from fear. Giving politicians more power based on people’s fears is like giving firemen pay raises based on how many false alarms are reported.

Harris promises the “freedom to be safe from gun violence.” Harris previously supported banning private ownership of pistols, warrantless searches of people’s homes to inspect their firearms, and confiscating the most popular rifle in America. Freedom from fear of guns will justify politicians confiscating any firearm that frightens any liberal in the land. Disarming Americans will leave them in total dependency on the same politicians who lied to confiscate their guns in the first place.

Walz declared that he and Kamala were devoted to safeguarding “the freedom for children to go to school without worrying if they’ll be shot in the halls.” But what about children’s freedom not to be forcibly injected with experimental vaccines? Liberal Democratic governors in California and New York pushed hard to make Covid vaccines mandatory for school kids. California is also safeguarding the “freedom” to mastermind using drugs or other interventions to assist kids to change their gender while keeping the treatment secret from parents.

Harris champions “the fundamental freedom of a woman to be able to make decisions about her own body.” But vast numbers of nurses were fired for refusing to get the Covid vaccine that Biden mandated for all health care workers. Biden sought to compel tens of millions to get those injections despite their dismal failure to prevent Covid infections or transmission. The Supreme Court blocked Biden’s mandate for private employees but perversely allowed it for health care workers (even though many of them had natural immunity after recovering from Covid infections). That court decision did not prevent liberal governors and mayors from imposing vaccine passport restrictions that effectively sought to banish the unvaccinated from society. 

All that matters is that the latest Covid booster is government-approved—so forcing people to get injected is no violation of individual freedom, which includes freedom to obey your superiors. The same standard could justify imposing endless vaccine mandates for future plagues that escape from federally-funded labs.

Harris pledges to give Americans “the freedom to breathe clean air, and drink clean water and live free from the pollution that fuels the climate crisis.” Since the 1970s, federal legislation has sharply curbed pollution of air and water. And how would Harris define this new “freedom”? Parts per billion or parts per trillion of contaminants? To achieve Harris’s vague standards, federal regulators would be entitled to ban gasoline-powered cars and gas stoves. Harris would also entitle bureaucrats to inflict endless restrictions on development to satisfy the latest green fetish.

Harris-Walz freedom is a circus shell game in which constitutional restraints vanish and politicians always win. Once politicians invoke the new freedoms to stretch their power, it will not matter whether they deliver the bounties they promise. Citizens will be left muzzled and disarmed and at the mercy of officialdom.

The campaign video pledged that Harris would give Americans “freedom from control.” A more honest Harris-Walz campaign slogan would be: “For your own good.” Or maybe promise Americans the “freedom to be what the government approves”? Perhaps the Harris-Walz art team could create an icon portraying an iron fist as the new, improved symbol of freedom. Adding a smiley face atop the fist would harmonize with the Harris “joy” and “positive vibes” campaign theme. 

Redefining boundless arbitrary power as freedom is the death knell for government under the law. The Harris-Walz delusions on freedom stem in part from the Democratic Party’s perverse notion of the proper role of government. The perverse redefinition of freedom parallels the attempt to portray politicians as literal saviors. At the Democratic National Convention, New Mexico Gov. Michelle Grisham hailed Harris: “We need a president who can be Consoler-in-Chief. We need a president capable of holding us in a great big hug.” 

Not me. I have enough shams in my life without some politician pretending to be my friend.

Instead of vesting blind trust in Harris and Walz, Americans should heed Thomas Jefferson’s 1798 warning: “In questions of power, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.” Those constitutional chains will come in damn handy no matter who wins the election next month.

Is there as much confusion in America on the meaning of freedom as there is on the benefits of tariffs? For almost half a century, prevailing opinion in this nation recognized the folly of permitting politicians to recklessly blockade our own ports with heavy taxes on imports. But both parties are now portraying tariffs as economic magic wands.

Similarly, Americans for generations had an instinctive recognition of the danger of unleashing politicians and letting government officials wantonly intrude into their lives. The Supreme Court declared in 1934, “A general, roving... investigation, conducted by a commission without any allegations... is unknown to our Constitution and laws; and such an inquisition would be destructive of the rights of the citizen, and an intolerable tyranny.” But this is practically the recipe for Harris-Walz freedom as well as some of Donald Trump’s interventionist schemes. Regardless of the election outcome, Americans must beware of Trojan horse definitions of freedom that allow bureaucrats to clamor out and take over everyone’s lives.

Tyler Durden Mon, 10/14/2024 - 22:35

Spy Drones Swarmed Langley Air Base, Pentagon Unable To Counter Threat

Zero Hedge -

Spy Drones Swarmed Langley Air Base, Pentagon Unable To Counter Threat

Since the start of the 21st century, America's defense spending has soared nearly 50%, with this year's budget surpassing $841 billion. Yet, despite being the world's largest military spender, the Pentagon alarmingly struggles to protect the homeland against the rising threat of spy drones operating within US borders. 

A new Wall Street Journal report said a fleet of spy drones swarmed some of America's most sensitive national-security sites, including Langley Air Force Base on Virginia's shoreline late last year.

For several nights, military personnel had reported a mysterious breach of restricted airspace over a stretch of land that has one of the largest concentrations of national-security facilities in the US. The show usually starts 45 minutes to an hour after sunset, another senior leader told Kelly.

The first drone arrived shortly. Kelly, a career fighter pilot, estimated it was roughly 20 feet long and flying at more than 100 miles an hour, at an altitude of roughly 3,000 to 4,000 feet. Other drones followed, one by one, sounding in the distance like a parade of lawn mowers.

The drones headed south, across Chesapeake Bay, toward Norfolk, Va., and over an area that includes the home base for the Navy's SEAL Team Six and Naval Station Norfolk, the world's largest naval port. -WSJ

US Air Force Gen. Mark Kelly told the Journal that he was stumped by reports of spy drones over Langley AFB. The Journal said the drones flew around the base and other highly sensitive military installations in the region at night for a little more than two weeks. Some officials suspected Russian or Chinese agents were conducting aerial spy operations.

Kelly said some drones were roughly 20 feet long and flew more than 100 mph at 3,000 to 4,000 feet altitude. None of these drones were shot down because federal law prohibits the military from dispatching F-22s, F-35s, and other fighter jets to neutralize drones for 'aerial snooping' - unless these unmanned systems posed an 'imminent threat.'

Shortly after the spy drones first appeared across the Chesapeake Bay region, President Biden was briefed on the national security threat. Officials from the Defense Department, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Pentagon's UFO office consulted with outside experts to understand the gravity of the situation. 

Drone incursions into heavily restricted airspace shouldn't be some shocker in Biden-Harris' America, where open southern borders have flooded the nation with ten-plus million illegal aliens, some of which have been terrorists, spies, prison gangs from South America, and other violent criminals. 

WSJ noted that Homeland Security Advisor Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall spoke with other White House officials about deploying anti-drone guns to jam signals, yet did not because of the fear of disrupting local civilian communication networks. Another idea officials had to counter this threat was directed energy weapons, and again, weren't deployed for fear of harming commercial jets. 

Authorities mostly ruled out the possibility of amateur drone pilots.

In early January, a Chinese student who attended the University of Minnesota was caught flying a drone near Langley AFB. The FBI found the Chinese student had drone footage of Navy ships docked at the base. He was arrested and charged with unlawfully taking photos of classified naval installations after trying to flee the country. 

The takeaway here is that this is an amazing display of incompetence by the military and federal government as those in the highest levels of power focus on a disastrous "woke" agenda that is weakening the nation from within. 

Tyler Durden Mon, 10/14/2024 - 21:20

DOJ Sues Virginia For Purging Voter Rolls Close To Election

Zero Hedge -

DOJ Sues Virginia For Purging Voter Rolls Close To Election

Authored by Aldgra Fredly via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a lawsuit against Virginia on Oct. 11, alleging that the state violated federal law by removing potential noncitizen voters from the rolls too close to the general election.

Voters work on their ballots at a polling station at the Elena Bozeman Government Center in Arlington, Va., on Sept. 20, 2024. AFP via Getty Images

In a court filing, the DOJ alleged that Virginia’s voter removal program violated the “Quiet Period Provision” in the National Voter Registration Act, which requires that states complete their programs for removing ineligible voters from active rolls no later than 90 days before an election.

“Congress adopted the National Voter Registration Act’s quiet period restriction to prevent error-prone, eleventh hour efforts that all too often disenfranchise qualified voters,” Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke said in a statement.

The complaint, filed on Oct. 11, also named the state Board of Elections and Virginia Commissioner of Elections Susan Beals as defendants.

According to the complaint, Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin signed an executive order in August requiring the commissioner to certify that daily updates to the state’s voter lists were being conducted.

These updates involved comparing the list of individuals identified as noncitizens by the State Department of Motor Vehicles “to the list of existing registered voters,” the DOJ stated.

Local registrars were then required to notify those voters that they needed to affirm their citizenship within 14 days or they would be removed from the list of registered voters, according to the Justice Department.

The DOJ said the process has resulted in U.S. citizens having their voter registrations canceled. The state removed 6,303 individuals from the rolls between January 2022 and July 2024, according to the complaint.

It further alleged that local registrars had no discretion to prevent the cancellation of voters who fail to return “an affirmation of citizenship” even if they have reason to believe that those voters are U.S. citizens.

This systematic voter removal program, which the State is conducting within 90 days of the upcoming federal election, violates the Quiet Period Provision,” the DOJ said in a statement.

Youngkin criticized the Biden administration for filing the lawsuit with less than 30 days before the election and said that he had “appropriately” enforced the law.

The Republican governor called the DOJ’s lawsuit “unprecedented” and said it was a “politically motivated” attempt to interfere with the state election, according to a statement issued by his office on Oct. 11.

Virginians—and Americans—will see this for exactly what it is: a desperate attempt to attack the legitimacy of the elections in the Commonwealth, the very crucible of American Democracy,” Youngkin stated.

“With the support of our Attorney General, we will defend these commonsense steps, that we are legally required to take, with every resource available to us.”

The DOJ filed a similar lawsuit against the state of Alabama and its Secretary of State on Sept. 27 over the state’s program that was aimed at removing ineligible voters, including noncitizens, from active rolls. It stated that Alabama announced the launch of the voter roll purge program 84 days before the Nov. 5 general election, which violated the National Voter Registration Act.

Tyler Durden Mon, 10/14/2024 - 20:55

Pages